¡Hola Johana y bienvenida a OpenStreetMap!
Ha agregado aquí el nombre "Hogar" para mostrar que es una casa. No hay necesidad de hacer eso, ya que OpenStreetMap usa "etiquetas" para mostrar qué son las cosas (el nombre es solo el nombre). Tampoco es necesario agregar una etiqueta de "identificador".
Alguien ya cambió este, solo para avisarte. Cualquier otra pregunta, por favor no dude en preguntar!
Atentamente,
Andy

Hello Johana and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've added the name "Hogar" here to show that it is a house. There's no need to do that, since OpenStreetMap uses "tags" to show what things are (the name is just the name). There's also no need to add an "indentificador" tag either.
Someone's already changed this one - just letting you know. Any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
Best Regards,
Andy

There's a cattle grid on it, so I'd imagine that most horse routers will try and avoid that :)
If it was a locked gate on a private bit of road and the bridleway actually ran to the side, then a bunch of "no" tags would make sense, but presumably foot access isn't actually illegal across the cattle grid, and people are free to hop across on foot (or use the gate) as required?
I'm not overly familiar with the area and can certainly think of places in Yorkshire where a private cattle crid has been added in parallel with a gate on a public road (with access rules posted about the cattle grid).

Actually, the changes in this changeset look at bit odd: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=136971395 . Presumably the "foot=no" on way/929336505 is supposed to encourage people on foot to avoid the cattle grid rather than saying that they are legally excluded from it?

Hello,
All of your changesets seem to have the same comment, "Work in this area is to update way locations and access tags at NT's $place. For more info on the organised editing activity see: osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths". Please don't do that - instead say what it was you actually changed, and why.

Hello,
In this change you've increased the san_scale for https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/839038651 from alpine_hiking to difficult_alpine_hiking. Was that deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello xzaviar, and welcome t OpenStreetMap!
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
Can you explain why you reverted this changeset without discussion?
There's a thread ongoing in the Italian forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706 - please do reply either here or there. If you don't do that and continue editing we'll have to assume that this account has also been created by the bad actor who's causing the problems elsewhere, and revert this and other similar edits.
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Hello,
What is the source used here "AnyGIS_Sat_clean_HD; AnyGIS_labels_en"? All Saints Church looks odd - it has an image tag that points at a Google Map. I ask about the source because we can't actually Google Maps as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" would be a a perfectly good source for OSM. If Google was used as a source, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.
Also, where did "Sherburn in Helmet" come from? That's got Spaceballs vibes to it that I wouldn't really associate with a small commuter village in Yorkshire :)
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Indeed, but the comment I linked to suggests that the editing should not start until the discussion has completed.

Ahem: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/automated-edits-avinet-ua/99879/13

"Local knowledge" of every postbox in the UK is pretty impressive :)

(OK - I know that's not what you meant...)

Sorry, "this" didn't remove it, changeset/137041173 did, but it still needs adding back to the relation...

Hello, this removes way/487937738 from the Chilterns AONB, which means it is no longer closed.

Thanks

@Samuele Battarra - are you saying that you'd like me to revert some of the changes in changeset/137016320 ? If so, you might need to be specific which because some of that looks OK - https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/280982186 .

Thanks!

Ahem - you seem to have missed way/1171250526 by the same user :)
(probably all of their changes can be reverted, to be honest)

The node added here was one of a whole series of notes, accounts, and some edits that have exactly the same data format and content, apart from the location.

If you're happy that this one is genuine (maybe you've surveyed it in person, or have access to Mapillary etc. for this location) , please do undelete this node.

node/10316517329/history just looked like spam to me.