For plans for the NCN please refer to https://www.walkwheelcycletrust.org.uk/national-cycle-network/our-plans-to-improve-the-national-cycle-network/

Yes it has been removed from the NCN because there is no easy alternative route. The section to the east on B5344 and A595 has also been removed due to road safety concerns, so it made sense to remove the whole section between Sellafield station and Saltcoats south of Holmrook.

Hi Richard, I want to edit Burwardsley Road by removing a relation but I cannot select it because there is a line associated with it. Does the residential area of Tattenhall need to be defined by a line as well as an area?

OK I think I have fixed the issue. There are 3 NCN5 relations in the Craigside area.

Not sure which bit you are referring to? This changeset is near Bodedern on Anglesey but the relation takes me to Llandudno?

Thanks, those stragglers have been removed.

Hi Ginaro, I have removed the two ways from NCN776 but the guidepost is still there? I will check with WWCT about the regional route; from Auchtermuchty to Newburgh it is part of the Fife Millennium Cycleway

Hi Muzz17, fair enough if there are signs on the ground. I'll check with WWCT for the correct alignment for NCN1.

Thanks Andy, maybe they ran out of stickers? According to WWCT records, that section is complete for removal of red patches.

The sign may have been modified. I am relying on reports that a route section has been changed on the ground so that it is no longer part of the NCN, typically by the red number patch being covered.

Well spotted! I have removed that short section.

OK thanks, that's fine with me.

OK, but where are the signs? It's an important principle for OSM that the mapping reflects what is on the ground.

That may well be the intention, but the artwork is in a grassed area so is not ideal as the official start. I'm just trying to resolve differences between Walk Wheel Cycle Trust and OSM mapping, happy to make changes if you have you information about the signs on the ground

Sorry that should read "Extension to NCN626".

Well spotted! I had selected a power cable instead of the adjacent track, now corrected.

I'm happy to defer to the local mapper as I have not been at this location for a few years. I know there are changes associated with the A30 works.

Thanks, I've learned a lot, fascinating!

Sorry Andy, I've reached the limit of my knowledge about relations and I don't know how to share the links. Full names of relations are [PROPOSED]Starley Regional Cycle Network and National Cycle Network Route 5. In hindsight, maybe I should have tried to edit the relation that did not have the route number.

Hi Andy, I can only see two relations - Starley Network and NCN5. I thought I had deleted the NCN relation that did not specify route number and replaced it with the NCN5 relation.