Não sei o que é Vendas Novas. No Porto ( https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2tmP ) bifanas são marcados como amenity=cafe ou amenity=restaurant. Acho que errado também.

P.S.: moro no Porto e gosto de bifanas.

Mas sandes são fast_food! De

osm.wiki/Pt:Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food

>local que serve refeições de confeção rápida, como sanduíches e salgados, para consumo no local ou para fora

Hi!

Here Casa das Bifanas should be amenity=fast_food and not amenity=bbq

Hello!

This is a weird change, seems incorrect to me. It seems unlikely that pond has assigned street name. And for housenumber I suppose nohousenumber=* should be used instead

Hi!

Do you still think that barrier=kerb should be used for the cathedral outline e.g. here way/1099622911 ? Seems incorrect to me.

Я исправляю тип назад на historic=memorial.

Почему так правильно: см. osm.wiki/RU:Tag:artwork_type%3Dstatue

Цитата: "Для статуи, изображающей памятную или историческую личность, используйте historic=memorial + memorial=statue. "

Olá!

Tenho reparado que andas a adicionar muitos números de porta. Recomendo que experimentes a aplicação "Every Door". Podes instalá-la no telemóvel e é muito prático para adicionar moradas enquanto andas na rua.

Hi!

Why have you changed this node node/6987730585 from historic=memorial to tourism=artwork? As I understand historic=memorial is intended to remember any actually existed person or real historical event. And Taras Shevchenko really existed as influential person at some point in history, it is not like it is fictional person like Apollon god. So IMHO it should be tagged as historic=memorial .

Hello!

addr:housenumber should not be used to mark buildings that do not have housenumber. See addr:housenumber=*

Quote: "Add nohousenumber=yes to the address and keep addr:housenumber=* empty."

But regardless I think that it is improbable that fountain has assigned address, so I am going to revert this change. Please tell me if you have any sources that prove that this fountain really has assigned address.

Thanks!

I've updated it even further, by Esri imagery. It is never in this area than Bing.

Hi! Are you sure that historic=monument is accurate description of way/1104506426 ? Seems more like tourism=artwork to me

Hi!

I am going to delete this node. It seems to be a mistake.

It is located within already existing relation/11191111 "Parque Vale do Leça"

Hi! I checked your latest changesets and it seems you always use "Orthophotos of mainland Portugal - 25 cm - 2018 (DGT)" imagery layer when performing your edits. Have you seen, that there is layer switcher in iD editor? And "Bing Maps Aerial" higher resolution and just about 2 years old - much more recent than "Orthophotos of mainland Portugal". I recommend you try it out. Mapping with such clear imagery is much more fun! And allows making more precise edits.

Hello!

It seems to me you have used "name" tags incorrectly in this change. This cemetery does not actually has a name.

See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things (section "Don't use name tag to describe things") and osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only (section "Name is the name only").

I am going to remove name here

heritage:website link is broken now( Maybe you know current working link?

Hi

I am going to move specie name to species=* tag . I think "name" should not be used for it.

Hi! Are you sure that way/1391567003 is a parking area? Do you have other sources besides bing aerial imagery? Does not look like car parking space to me on bing imagery.

Hello!

This changeset is problematic. It several buildings on top of existing ones. For instance, way/1305386992 is located in the same place where building relation/8889531 already present.

Another one way/1305387001 even should not be a building! There is water body there way/640937775

It seems that this changeset was produced by some kind of automation. Please do not upload other changes from the same tool without manual verification.

Olá!

Was any reason why way/1307028817/history was access=no? Looks like accidental mistake.

👋 Welcome to OpenStreetMap contributors!

This was your first edit and you made some accidentally made some unintended changes. Particularly I would like to point out:
- changing landuse of way/448744867 from farmland to leisure park. Indeed farmland was not a correct type, but park in my opinion is even more incorrect. This should be landuse=allotments (see landuse=allotments )
- You set name of construction area way/1267795895 to "Parque Urbano de Requesende". That is also incorrect for this area: they do not build park, they build apartments building.

Though you are right that this area is quite poorly represented and needs work. I am going to improve it soon. Would you like to review my edits when they are done and comment them based on your local knowledge?