Hi

Still a veritable mess, seeing a miles long bridge on top of a miles long path which is mapped largely on top of a miles long path, the eldest, that ratrun mapped 3 years ago. Are you ready to use the reverter as moving a few nodes wont do it, Still flagged in OSMI.

Ciao

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

This is not the shape of the building,, that was the construction area. You need to map the buildings separately, which look like 2 attached apartment buildings, 4-5 floors with a connect in between, probably needing the condo=yes tag in addition.

ciao.

Hi ancora.

Aspettando la tua risposta. Nel frattempo ha cambiato Piantando 1 in una zona di confine in quanto contiene un mix di frutteti, vigneti, erba e bosco. Il sito web non spiega l'area più ampia che è anche un mix di bosco, macchia e agricoltura.
Mappa ciò che effettivamente sul terreno, non ciò che ti piace che sia.
Pensa che debba anche essere rietichettato in una zona di confine.

SekeRob

Render of the 325, now 327 member farmland has successfully restored. If the causing section suggests, the missing outline piece was last edited 5 years ago and view at 2km zoom and lower wtih no farmland showing confirms it's been longer broken. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi il a été cassé aussi longtemps.

Hi,

The area you mapped covers same areas as existing forest and the outlines cross themselves which cannot be. What's the plan with this 'project'?

L'area che hai mappato copre le stesse aree della foresta esistente e i contorni si incrociano, cosa che non può essere. Qual è il piano con questo? Questo progetto ha un nome?

SekeRob

E? Edifice non e inner per niente, Amico. ;o)

Ce ne sono già stati parecchi sulla costa, amico ;O),. Non ha urgenza. Vecchia espressione inglese DIRFT: Do it right first time every time (Fallo bene la prima volta ogni volta.)

We (me at least) also witnesses that your JOSM version is 18463 where the latest stable tested is 18570. 😎

PS, it's curious that at least 4 of your springs are corners of the same building, so was it springs you did or something else too ;P).

OR, as JOSM allows, upload each object separately: Upload screen > Settings tab > "Upload each object individually" radio button,

Di niente

Almost Too Simple.

Hi,

V.v. your resolution of duplicate segments, you ignored entirely that a Trabocco consist of a building in the sea on poles aka it's on layer=1, a walking bridge from shore to building and planks on poles (the arms you see reaching out into the see from which the fishing nets are hung out). In short, not a building of multiple parts.

Now the DS errors on OSMI has disappeared and everyone forgets the mapping is entirely wrong.

Ciao,

vv la tua risoluzione di segmenti duplicati, hai ignorato del tutto che un Trabocco consiste in un edificio nel mare su pali alias è su layer=1, un ponte pedonale dalla riva all'edificio e assi su pali (le braccia che vedi protendersi nel mare da cui si appendono le reti da pesca). Insomma, non un edificio di più parti.

Ora l'avvisi DS su OSMI è scomparso e tutti dimenticano che la mappatura è completamente sbagliata. Rosoluzione niente.

Imagine: https://www.google.com/search?q=trabocco

Gone ahead and reported the issue of valid tag removals and leaving the white lines only to the Data Work Group "mapping for rendering", to include incorrect tag usages such as footways as areas. Unacceptable to me.

cheers

Hi,

Your H2 updated path always ended at a cliff reaching the top, but now it's mapped too in OSM. Must be an pretty impressive sight from there going by 3D imagery, on a clear day of course. A viewpoint node would certainly not be out of place I think in that spot, worth the hiking travails getting there.

ciao

Hi,

Case you read this, Bea has been reversing the path tags again so the island car and island all have started to reappear again in my OSMI list for the stuff I fixed. Even the paths I added few days ago from paths to entrances have changed to tagless lines again. Clearly rules seem not to apply here, laughing stock if you ask me.

ciao from Italy who was foolish enough to correct a typo in wheelchair in level0 editor not aware of the stat here, which is when the issues started to appear in my Inspector list, of certain dung type. I leave them now and be patient to see if the DWG finally steps in. To me this is reportable.

The 2 route with same name Anello delle Bregonze n.11 (1075675888, v3+V5 will soon be removed as having been mapped on top of other existing ways with hundreds of unconnected nodes overlying other ways. Need to have a walking/hiking route relation created.

Sorry

Il 2° percorso omonimo Anello delle Bregonze n.11 (1075675888, v3+V5 sarà presto rimosso in quanto mappato su altri percorsi esistenti con centinaia di nodi non collegati sovrapposti ad altri percorsi. Necessita di una relazione percorso pedonale/escursionistico creato.

Mi dispiace.

Curiously, no ford=0 but there are 154 ford=no in the database. several checked in Italy these are on ways *before* reaching water, one like 1km long, another combined with bridge=yes. The wonders that are in the DB database. :O)))

It's notable by viewing the user edit history that pretty much all edits of the last 6 years have been reverted. Seems to be a candidate to for a non-expiring block application.
@%CE%93%CE%B9%CE%AC%CE%BD%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%82%204/history#map=2/-7.4/23.6

Hi,

When changing way lays it's really advisable to go by the 'newest' imagery. Clarity is prehistoric to say the least and offset badly is is warned for in other editors. Previous position of Via Fontana restored.

PLUS 9 warnings of non-standard taggings in the change set summary.

Hi,

You touched many things in a very large area in a single edit session which is ill advised. For that see wiki on change set '(recommended) best practise' to keep it compact: osm.wiki/Changeset

Your changes include 16 warnings per the edit summary above. It would be good if you resolve these too like the other 12 issues you fixed.

Happy mapping.

hi,

I "Anello delle Bregonze n.11": Fixme="Effettuare revert"

Assolutemente. Il mappatore che lo ha inserito non ha risposto a più messaggi.. Doppio 'highway'. Se reali, i tag dovrebbero essere spostati nei modi preesistenti come relazione di percorso (nuove route relation).

ciao