E? Edifice non e inner per niente, Amico. ;o)

Ce ne sono già stati parecchi sulla costa, amico ;O),. Non ha urgenza. Vecchia espressione inglese DIRFT: Do it right first time every time (Fallo bene la prima volta ogni volta.)

We (me at least) also witnesses that your JOSM version is 18463 where the latest stable tested is 18570. 😎

PS, it's curious that at least 4 of your springs are corners of the same building, so was it springs you did or something else too ;P).

OR, as JOSM allows, upload each object separately: Upload screen > Settings tab > "Upload each object individually" radio button,

Di niente

Almost Too Simple.

Hi,

V.v. your resolution of duplicate segments, you ignored entirely that a Trabocco consist of a building in the sea on poles aka it's on layer=1, a walking bridge from shore to building and planks on poles (the arms you see reaching out into the see from which the fishing nets are hung out). In short, not a building of multiple parts.

Now the DS errors on OSMI has disappeared and everyone forgets the mapping is entirely wrong.

Ciao,

vv la tua risoluzione di segmenti duplicati, hai ignorato del tutto che un Trabocco consiste in un edificio nel mare su pali alias è su layer=1, un ponte pedonale dalla riva all'edificio e assi su pali (le braccia che vedi protendersi nel mare da cui si appendono le reti da pesca). Insomma, non un edificio di più parti.

Ora l'avvisi DS su OSMI è scomparso e tutti dimenticano che la mappatura è completamente sbagliata. Rosoluzione niente.

Imagine: https://www.google.com/search?q=trabocco

Gone ahead and reported the issue of valid tag removals and leaving the white lines only to the Data Work Group "mapping for rendering", to include incorrect tag usages such as footways as areas. Unacceptable to me.

cheers

Hi,

Your H2 updated path always ended at a cliff reaching the top, but now it's mapped too in OSM. Must be an pretty impressive sight from there going by 3D imagery, on a clear day of course. A viewpoint node would certainly not be out of place I think in that spot, worth the hiking travails getting there.

ciao

Hi,

Case you read this, Bea has been reversing the path tags again so the island car and island all have started to reappear again in my OSMI list for the stuff I fixed. Even the paths I added few days ago from paths to entrances have changed to tagless lines again. Clearly rules seem not to apply here, laughing stock if you ask me.

ciao from Italy who was foolish enough to correct a typo in wheelchair in level0 editor not aware of the stat here, which is when the issues started to appear in my Inspector list, of certain dung type. I leave them now and be patient to see if the DWG finally steps in. To me this is reportable.

The 2 route with same name Anello delle Bregonze n.11 (1075675888, v3+V5 will soon be removed as having been mapped on top of other existing ways with hundreds of unconnected nodes overlying other ways. Need to have a walking/hiking route relation created.

Sorry

Il 2° percorso omonimo Anello delle Bregonze n.11 (1075675888, v3+V5 sarà presto rimosso in quanto mappato su altri percorsi esistenti con centinaia di nodi non collegati sovrapposti ad altri percorsi. Necessita di una relazione percorso pedonale/escursionistico creato.

Mi dispiace.

Curiously, no ford=0 but there are 154 ford=no in the database. several checked in Italy these are on ways *before* reaching water, one like 1km long, another combined with bridge=yes. The wonders that are in the DB database. :O)))

It's notable by viewing the user edit history that pretty much all edits of the last 6 years have been reverted. Seems to be a candidate to for a non-expiring block application.
@%CE%93%CE%B9%CE%AC%CE%BD%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%82%204/history#map=2/-7.4/23.6

Hi,

When changing way lays it's really advisable to go by the 'newest' imagery. Clarity is prehistoric to say the least and offset badly is is warned for in other editors. Previous position of Via Fontana restored.

PLUS 9 warnings of non-standard taggings in the change set summary.

Hi,

You touched many things in a very large area in a single edit session which is ill advised. For that see wiki on change set '(recommended) best practise' to keep it compact: osm.wiki/Changeset

Your changes include 16 warnings per the edit summary above. It would be good if you resolve these too like the other 12 issues you fixed.

Happy mapping.

hi,

I "Anello delle Bregonze n.11": Fixme="Effettuare revert"

Assolutemente. Il mappatore che lo ha inserito non ha risposto a più messaggi.. Doppio 'highway'. Se reali, i tag dovrebbero essere spostati nei modi preesistenti come relazione di percorso (nuove route relation).

ciao

Hi,

I've done that before and then the original mapper who left these tagless ways removed the tags again.. Think pedestrian tag on pedestrian area is the better tagging as it render it makes them invisible.

ciao

cheers.

Hi,

moi encore, I've gone ahead and deleted the double/triple path ways leaving those that had hiking relations and actual grading tags. Also moved a query put on a name tag to a fixme note. Link the CS back to this discussion.

ciao ciao

Hi,

That's what gscholz wrote to him with wiki link. JDI on OSM does not work. The track needs to stay for vehicle routing, none are allowed on 'path'.

Hi Dino

What about the double and even triple at eastern end of path-path-track mapped smack on top of each other?

Track #180153859
Path #1104928659
Path #1104928660

Think the oldest way needs to stay and if there are any legit CAI tags they needs transferring to said oldest.

ciao.

PS Fulvio has done multiple of these overlapping way mappings, a popular thing with multiple trail mappers, not seemingly responding to any message from you and gscholz. I've been unsuccessful too to get any reaction from others, not even PM.

SekeRob

Hi, clear as mud to me

ruins use 111 thousand
ruin use 817

You change 4 from ruin to ruins and cover 4 continents in doing so in one edit set. Kindly do this on a less ' global' basis, 813 to go, in fact JOSM has an option to save by objects and nodes 1 by 1 wholly automatic and it will just be seen on a local by local basis. See save screen Settings > Upload each object individually, Please use :O!

Using turbooverpass launched from taginfo chttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ruin, the tool will show you a more localised basis where this could be updated, but does not have to be since the data consumers will know that ruin and ruins is the same thing.

MGIA
ciao