Cooment falsely copied from previous edit set, this actually landcover qualifications on the Majella.

Hi

You had not noticed the forest had disappeared from render view in OSM Carto? Duly correctly, per textbook with changeset/127566447#map=16/45.5859/10.3988

Hi

Non avevi notato che la foresta era scomparsa dal rendering in OSM Carto? In modo debitamente corretto, secondo il metodo di mappatura dei libri di testo con changeset/127566447#map=16/45.5859/10.3988

Ciao

Forgot source tag: Esri World Imagery

And when you do go international, please in Englisch, Bitteschön
ciao

Hi,

I've done some role clean up on the river beds passing thru the forest which effectively is nowhere inner, it's all outer as nowhere a single forest wraps around the river by 360 degrees.

As for the river bed sections, I would propose to retag that from scree to shingle: See wiki natural=shingle

ciao

We don't speak Czech in Italy, either Italian or English which is the common language on OSM most all comprehend, many actually preferring to post their CS comments in English which is what StreetComplete does, always.

Anyway, if you change tags on ways then you should have also correct the relations. NOW the 2 cycle routes on these ways are broken. At the very minimum the tags should be "bicycle=dismount", NOT no. There's also tags to tell the cyclist to bicycle=use_sidepath, opposite side of road etc. "Varie in Lesolo" is not an explanation. Tell other mappers the why.

ciao

Hi

Why did you change bicycle=yes to no when this way is part of a cycle route relation?

Broken ring landuse!

Just 20 issues resolved in 1 square area. To include the unclosed pedestrian area.

Hi,

Does anyone comprehend a few node changes in the German language area and in New Zealand at the same time? Do they speak German there too when the local mapper sees this change in the Change Set History?

Neither.

Pretty please, don't do that, make and save changes on a country basis and in a language most understand: English.

Change set guidelines, in German too: osm.wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz

TYSM for your future consideration

ciao from Italy.

Hi,

I don't get it, all the sections of the stream had that 'Torente' typo, the result of selecting all and changing Fiume to Torrente (by moi) Someone fixed 1 part, you fixed a 2nd part, but then there's a 3rd, 4th and 5th.
relation/14554048

Am I missing something ;P)

The relation is correct though \0/

Ciao

While there added traffic_signal direction to a bunch.

BTW, I'd be surprised it the sign exiting the fuel station there indicates 'no left turn', more probably 'only right only'. Unterschied zwischen sinnvoll und korrekt. :O)

Hi,

Danke schön, but it would be appropriate if you change/add to OSM in Italy to do your comments in Italian or Englisch. Wir sprechen durchschnittlich kein Deutsch hier, noch immer nicht ;0)

Gruesschen.

Hi Roberto

Could you please check the lay of the path at the section relation/9812312#map=19/42.08525/14.17846

The change set does not tell which imagery you used, but if Clarity, that has a bad offset and torque. Just mapping Majella landcover again and noticed in most current regular ESRI (no offset) the path as it is mapped now goes up and down the cliff area instead of around as is well visible.

ciao

Change Set summary warnings: 10 (ten) , created with RapiD 1.1.9

Hi,

I've removed the bollard you put on the 1 way street, Viale Aleghieri, obstructing all vehicle navigation entry for the whole town centre. Imagery shows there are 3 bollard, but they have a traffic calming function, placed at the sides of the narrow street and pedestrian/cycleway, not a blocking.

cheers

PS Bollards placement and incorrect gate tagging are the main cause of routing problems for vehicle navigation. Always consider the effect for what comes after if that needs tag additions too.

Hi,

Before your changed the building shape it was semi square with a 'no reason' spike and after even less since the spike node should have been removed, not the south wall moved to the spike node. The building is actually square, so I corrected with this osm.org/edit?changeset=126734869

Kindly, when correcting use at least the 'The Q' key and look if the shape is fair, else what's the point of any correction ;O).

Just saying.

PS most all the buildings around that zone are poorly drawn, cause probably because the mapper did not consider the angle from which the sat image was shot.

Incl a motorway bridge extension from single element to 7 pier stretch across stream valley.

YES, now the farmland renders.