Hi,

Before your changed the building shape it was semi square with a 'no reason' spike and after even less since the spike node should have been removed, not the south wall moved to the spike node. The building is actually square, so I corrected with this osm.org/edit?changeset=126734869

Kindly, when correcting use at least the 'The Q' key and look if the shape is fair, else what's the point of any correction ;O).

Just saying.

PS most all the buildings around that zone are poorly drawn, cause probably because the mapper did not consider the angle from which the sat image was shot.

Incl a motorway bridge extension from single element to 7 pier stretch across stream valley.

YES, now the farmland renders.

Hi,

If you remember, please add the type of fire hydrant (e.g. pillar) and the colour. 1 is tagged red, the other has none.

ciao

PS, exact position to the nanosecond I'd not worry about. They'll be found when the fire is on but I'd not be surprised if nearer the steps you mapped.

👍 @rene78, best change tool yet when focused on a particular area. Added to my kit.

Something else, you tagged this gate with access=no. node/8513057943

Opening hours wont change that. Proper is to set locked=yes or much better access:conditional=yes @ (Mo-Su 09:00-19:00) This way the system understands when the area IS accessible.

Anyway, you stopped mapping after 3 change saves, so guess you were on a student mission like so many seem to get told by their tutors and never any corrective follow up. There's programs though like StreetComplete for android phones GoMap for Iphone and more that allow mapping in much information without risk of causing navigator routing issues. Using these when cycling around the country side and checking whether there are unanswered quests for practically anything that's been mapped but incomplete.

ciao

Yup, TagInfo shows 447 uses and a few more variations: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=incline%3Dup%2Fdown

Think I've used it a dozen or more times. Not my idea in origin, found In the ID drop down pick list, expressing that the way has what it infers, up and down sections. Such a description would apply to this street as well way/22986824
Yup, tagged with that. Cyclist come exercise here on the Colli Pescara and Montesilvano. There's 12% to 18% signed ways here. Every cut in a way where the incline reverses leads to an additional route navigator instruction, not a good idea.

I've seen and applied the reverter. A very actively mapped area just does not pop up new / forgotten roundabouts (sat imagery on OSM is way, way outdated, Clarity the worst with bad offset too).
Even a split raised curb on the crossing to prevent the Buffalo Bill leaving traffic, possibly inebriated, to cross the Marconi nightly race track into D'Acanio' Only a right is possible. Double white line not to Uturn, but that does not stop any Pescarese, just the navigator app.
Added bus lane tagging while there (will know tomorrow if QA accepts the choices as there are 3 schemes to do this, scheme 2 and 3 having fairly equal use, scheme 2 the simplest and preferred.
Imagery on a map note for your verification view. ;o)

NB: The reconstruction of Marconi but for the bus activated traffic signals is complete. Bus lane tagging still to add, with southbound view, all|bus|all|bus. Southbout bus lane is shared with bicycle. Bus lanes - NO PARKING - but that the Pescaratani will not ever respect.

Are you sure this roundabout is real?

way/1097104331

Somehow I remember you removing a roundabout in the very same place last year.

Anyway, QA flags it, a RB should have no name but when unique, needs junction=roundabout and removal of the superfluous oneway tag. All roundabouts on Marconi are of a hybrid hamburger type, the through way only for buses like you can see on the other ones on that street. The city so smartly is now installing bus activated traffic lights because that was is accidents in the waiting. Not seen progress though in a few weeks, but tomorrow I'm cycling south and the go-pro will register, has better memory than me too, solid state as it's called ;o)

ciao

PS There's also a flag of sudden level change from D'Ascanio onto the roundabout but that one does not make sense at all.

Flagged by QA: Consider if you put restrictions on gates access=no, the ways to and after the gate also need to have their access adjusted or you create unroutable states. Not the first time.

E non all'interno dell'isola pedonale!

Strikev Farindola, that's Pescosansonesco Nuovo

OK, in that case the construction=motorway needs to change to construction=amenity, add a note= tag with your description of the planned work (parking lot), and if you have start date and an (magnana magnana) delivery/completion date, fill those out as well. Then the system will ask when it's time if the work is done.

If the work has not started, (start date in future) than actually it's not construction but proposed.

Bus 19 I've fixed with chg of name per convention. Bus Rimini 1 is unclear whether it runs clock or anticlock. The part on the 8-roundabout suggests it's clock wise. The other 2 lines I did not check what wrong with those.

cheers

Ciao,

v.v. l'area di costruzione, strade o inclusivo i terreno nel triangolo?
Penso che sia solo una rotatoria e alcune strade secondo la tua descrizione sull'oggetto dell'area di costruzione.

Ho notato che le linee degli autobus che passano lì sono apparentemente tutte interrotte.

Dalla tua risposta si può dedurre che non stai guardando i dati in tempo reale. Il ponte non è mai partito, è lì da diversi mesi. Di fronte al canale sotterraneo è apparso 2 settimane fa senza una ragione apparente. L'ho rimosso. Il fiume non ha interruzioni. Caso chiuso.

Ponte ancora lì, che ripristina il corretto attraversamento del canale sotterraneo.

La combinazione di

culvert: way/839651898
bridge:
way/839651898

Molto strano

Hi,

beside the duplicate way of bridge on top of track which I've removed, there's also the culvert tag on the stream which tag was added AFTER the bridge was mapped months before. Which is it?

Ciao,

oltre al percorso duplicato del ponte in cima al sentiero che ho rimosso, c'è anche il tag del canale sotterraneo sul flusso che è stato aggiunto DOPO che il ponte è stato mappato mesi prima. Cos'è questo?