square and pedestrian area on one item does not fly in QA.

In fact, I'm discovering you've create way overlaps, noting that roundabouts get the road rating of the highest level way direct connecting i.e. it should have been tagged as tertiary.

Me having fixed 2 bus routes, there's sure to show half a dozen more tomorrow on my 'touched' list since the roundabout was not circular (right click on a round item and select the ring to make something round.

TBC

Start small in a town like Rome with all the complex inter-relations or you risk to break a lot in a single action.

cheers-

In doing so, you broke bus routes that cross the roundabout connecting to Via Giovanni Kobler: Know what you do, and do what you know.

Hi,

you mapped a tagless line in this CS
way/909745647
Osmose reports: "Missing tag or role on way/909745647"

You know best what it's supposed to do

ciao

Absent your urgent response, this erroneous change immediately affected vehicle routing, made the change in CS changeset/124593459
If you tell me where the signs of 1.9 meters and 1.8 are we can revisit.
Be careful with adding traffic affecting entries in StreetComplete, be absolutely sure, enter data while surveying on site.

cheers

In assenza della tua risposta urgente, questa modifica errata ha immediatamente influito sul percorso del veicolo, ha apportato la modifica in CS changeset/124593459
Se mi dici dove sono i segni di 1,9 metri e 1,8 possiamo rivisitare.
Fai attenzione con l'aggiunta di voci che influiscono sul traffico in StreetComplete, assicurati di inserire i dati durante il rilevamento in loco.

Saluti

Hi,

where did you get 1.9 respectively 1.8 maxheight from... a sign? Can you tell me where those signs area positioned?
I know that road very well, passed it again yesterday and the passage is more like 10 meters passing below the A25.

ciao

Hi,

Most odd, I know I mapped this way and tagged, 2 years ago as other part of way shows, it displays in my cycle program, Bosch connect, map base OSM 10/2021, rode it quite a few time, yet no history, version 1, How come, did you split the way in the process which notoriously looses history of segments? It's btw signed as part of the cycle track B6, but it's used by farmers and service vehicles too. Needs a motor_vehicle=permit tag. Also foot=designated + segregated=no. it's how to get to Punto Aderci from the parking.

ciao

Pune, India AND a road section in Germany resulting in every mapper in between to get this in their CS history view for the next couple of days. Surely you know the drill.

ciao from Italy

Hi

You changed track to unclassified but left the track:type grading on it and from space in ESRI imagery it sure looks like track to me and entering from the north end you go heel deep into the mud, barely doable in a 4WD i.e a trac-k-tor way. Is there some other guiding rule at work here?

ciao

Hi,

sorta wondering if that descriptive text was a copy/paste as OSM rejects hard carriage return. I've removed them to solve the issue

And thanks for mapping this 'glaring' port omission.

ciao

Hi,

No this way is not lit, only a few lanterns at (some) driveway starts. There are isolated lanterns popping up at driveways and crossings, often LED and solar panel/battery powered in the country side.

Unfortunately StreetComplete does not have the lit=limited option as what you can enter in the web based editors. Definitely the lesser wrong answer to the question here.
BTW, StreetComplete has an 'other' answer option which allows to split ways at points where situations changes e.g. paving type where some are first part asphalt and next part gravel.

ciao.

Hi, Bienvenue a OSM.

Really makes a lot of sense to map a bus stop in France and a restaurant in SE Asia, to you, but not to everyone else who get's this contribution listed at the top of their edit history view for the next couple of days until the next one comes along and updates the Blu elephant in Scotland and the toko they saw in downtown Jakarta, during their holidays, in 1 session.

Pretty please do keep an edit session in one place, save it and then move on to the next place. Only local mappers are interested in reviewing for correctness, can test against their local knowledge.

MTIA

The corrected area near the quarry has no feature tags and only appears in the BDO imagery, not in any other. Bare ground, bare rock it looks like.

Hat Tip to FinixFighter for providing the weblink to this artistry.

Hi,

Reference the 2 warnings in your change set summary, if you look for the lake, it has disappeared because the ring is broken, not closed. Also the grass patch where a pier is mapped is not closed. Should be easy to fix.

cheers

Hi I've made the changes and now the names appear on the map. Also changed the boccia tag and lifeguard with correct tagging.

happy holidays
ciao

Hi,

A holiday apartment block on a resort is a burough?

Description: "A part in larger city grouped into administrative unit."

Don't think this does apply in any way or form here. What you can create is an address node and add the addr:housename=Haus Milano

ciao

PS this applies to all the buroughs you created on Hapimag!

NB Fell is a "non-rendering" feature in standard Carto maps opposed to heath.

It comes worse, building orientation is sometimes off by several degrees... 2-3 or so, and yes, sometimes ESRI or Bing, or or or is poor, then I check on the others on layout, sizes. Near Lido Riccio there's a coastal section that looks like water, but in fact it's just poor rendering of deep shade. 3D showed it to be shrub up the steep hill side.

Discovered last week my cycle progam uses Mapbox as an option for background. It gives the identical picture as when looking in OSM which makes trace vefication a bit easier i.e. if it's fine, nothing to do. The one which was really off is the way up from Pretoro to Passo Lanciano on to Fonte Tettone in the closed canopy sections. Cycle GPS is often no good simply because the the GPS is mounted on the steering wheel... no steady direction. Did the verification run yesterday and found that one more long hairpin is way off, so much so that the program goes into 'finding new route' mode i.e. like 15+ meters off, so it's in the queue to be fixed. The rest was within tolerance after the intervention from 2 weeks ago.

buona sudorazione

Hi,

If I use ESRI to map a park, and the surrounding buildings and you then use Bing to 'slightly improve position' we're inserting conflicting positional information into an area. When I do buildings I look as a general rule what imagery was used by previous mappers to keep things consistent, noting the Clarity is severely outdated, missing many buildings not to speak of landuse outdatedness. Bing (I rarely use), ESRI and Clarity have quite an offset from each other and this hotch-potch of imagery uses the main cause of the many warped mapped areas.

Just so you know.
ciao