Resolved 3 issues created by CS changeset/120456901. Bare rock renders again. Queried with mapper as to what the intend was.

Hi,

What was the purpose of that line you traced along the administrative boundary and then gave it a role in the big/long bare rock which resulted in the bare rock no longer rendering?

ciao

Hi StevenBob and Benvenuti, Willkommen, Bienvenue, Welcome to OSM pleasure dome,

For your reading pleasure on how to not find your head on a dining plate when mapping for the common good

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
osm.wiki/Changeset

ciao

Just FYI, rough mapping does nothing in rendering terms, not in any of the 8 map render selections in Osmose, best to me carto.fe whose designer does lots of special sports pitch rendering features. Had forgotten I mapped a corner on my home course and then stopped, realising a course usually outside mown fairways is the very stuff we don't like to be in.
Have to revisit as all the tee boxes need retagging here. No ladies/men designation, just 4 coloured levels, back, middle, forward, juniors. (our course has on anything par 4 and 5 four tee boxes.)
Anyway, the scrub is no longer flagged in OSMI changing it to outer but it aint look good.
Vaguely remember having played Noordwijk for a competition + training round, but that was like 23-24 years ago. See lots of 'natural' sand traps to add from above.

Hi,

nothing but foot is from a navigation routing software point of view signified by the fact it is tagged as a footpath, foot=yes an overdo too, but that's what the wizard tags, usually as designated. So happens the DWG confirmed this while discussing a CS where someone did same.

Hi,

square does not need an area tag. Before was not flagged in any QA prog of OSM.

The tagging of both pedestrian area and square on the same object is technically conflicting though.

Hi,

Ik heb wat role correcties op je scrub gemaakt, echter ook zoals het nu is gemapped rendered the scrub door the fairways heen.

Voor de goede orde, mocht die scrub eigenlijk rough zijn, er is de golf=rough tag. Heb nog nooit op een baan gespeelt waar scrub (bosjes areaal) direct aan fairways grenst of erover gaat. Heb vorig jaar een hele golfbaan gedaan en geen rough gemapped omdat het de defenitie van on golfbaan is buiten de fairways, maar ik ga het testen om te zien of dat een bevredigend resultaat oplevert. IIG aan de in OSM gemapte Kennemer heb je een redelijk goed voorbeedl

ciao

PS er zijn nog tenminste 4 pad secties die verbinding behoeven zoals de warnings bij de CS aangeeft.

There's a tag value flood_prone with 23000 uses described as "Whether or not the feature is likely to flood after very heavy rain." Anyway, I've pushed the false positive button to indicate the user wants it so :O)

ciao

Hi,

After correcting 'intermitent' to 'intermittent', your wetland gets flagged that this key cant go together with wetland, not mentioned in the wetland wiki nor on the intermittent wiki. Maybe the land.

Maybe too add wetland=saltmarsh since the water is tagged as salt.

Just so your'e aware

ciao.

No worries. I always check in history view after large area edits if the render stays or the wood like here disappears. Unfortunately ID Editor is not very good at verification of closed rings on large relations as it does not load the full relation into memory if not new, but it does report oftentimes below the CS comment with warning(s) if something is wrong in the geometry.

Yes not in the almighty wiki page, the region value comes though up in the editor drop down list, has 700x used according taginfo. Why the 'Nicht Loeschen' on there? Can't be anyway since it's part of a relation, no roles employed here, but ID Editor too gives warning, can't exit without assigning a meaning to a line which is why I not consciously do anything to those blank lines. Unfortunately ID does not fully pre-save check a large 186 member relation unless it's completely loaded in memory, so on large relations it escapes validation -*pre-save*, but it does during save which then causes a warning listed with the edit set. That's in 2022. What it could and could not in 2020 or 2012 I don't know, well before my active mapping days.

Anyway, I'll see of the combined QA powers of Osmose, OSMI and Keepright throw a fit in the coming days and weeks.

BTW on regions, place=region noted as old and rarely used but it does have some 2022 commentary on v.v. natural regions.

Hi,

The way crossing the 'multi-storey' parking is flagged. Aerial suggests your entrances are at different levels but all are tagged level=0 so I can't determine if the north-south way at right is crossing the roof (level=nn) or needs being tagged as a tunnel=building_passage with the appropriate level at which it's crossing.

ciao

PS, whatever happened to the AED. Is it now in the right place and can the fixme be removed?

Hi,

One of these relation lines has been sitting there unnoticed for 2 years with an Osmose alert without any tagging' but your note 'nicht loeschen', until I made the mistake of touching the boundary relation it's part of. I've now added the boundary=region tag to satisfy the system where the relation tag says place=region.

As a rule of thumb, any line you leave in Osmose that shows as a plain white line is a problem. it MUST have a qualification of what it represents. Notes on their own are not.

cheers.

PS I've found ore tagless lines in that, but since I did not touch them I don't get fingered as being co-culprit on those.

Short visit, 12 issues solved \o/

Hi,

what are there tourism=information.... information=guidepost? Please add the information type.

The cascade needs to be part of a line i.e. if you know the route of the fosso delle Farfalle, please add.

cosa ci sono tourism=information... information=guidepost? Si prega di aggiungere il tipo di informazioni.

La cascata deve essere parte di una linea, quindi se si conosce il percorso del fosso delle Farfalle si prega di aggiungere.

grazie

Yup, now it renders.

Hi,

As per the warnings above going with your change set, the buildings relation is not exactly perfect and has in OSM Inspector 6 points of unclosed rings (of building). The result is that 3/4 does not render. I've rebuild them. If you want to combine them, don't use multipolygon but the type=building relation and retag the buildings as building:part of that relation.

The mapped steps are flagged as a floating island i.e. not routable. I've added a way based on sat imagery and added steps at front entrance.
See relation/14073807 for the changes.

ciao

ciao.

BTW, why is the Uni grounds area at layer=1?

Hi,

The object is now flagged as having been mapped both as a way and a relation. "Object tagged twice as way and relation
relation/13853764 analyser josm iD edit. I've removed the way and only left the Uni grounds in the relation.

cheers

Hi,

Your edit was flagged in Osmose where the path crosses the Tordino. You put a bridge:support tag there. Bridge supports cannot exist without a bridge so I've changed it to a bridge in the path. If it's just a point where having the walk through the water to the other side the bridge needs to go back to what it originally was, a ford=yes.

cheers