Hi,

I must have been fixing the Wienerwald for the dozenth time in the last month. You, and not only you, need to pay attention to inner and outer roles and where they go. When e.g. scrub and grass share sides, the forest role should not pass in between, the line should be cut and the forest role removed inbetween. Here in fact the scrub is no longer inner anymore since the forest is not 360 degrees surrounding it. There's more of the same problems to the east side forest as well, again scrub and grass sharing a side(s) with each other. The forest outline cant go there, not inner or outer.

Also there was a new line drawn only used by the wald relation, in places it overlays the grass area which caused render issues.

Anyway the corrections are in changeset/119943525

Study the changers please and if not understood, ask, as keeping repairing this wood is not good for anything.

Ciao from the Abruzzos

Hi,

Perché hai tolto il nome 'Largo Sant'Eustachio' e poi l'hai ripristinato come Piazza Sant'Eustachio? Si prega di aggiungere il tag osm.wiki/Tag:source=.... sull'oggetto con la descrizione delle origini.

Ciao,

Buildings removed should be tagged as razed:building and possible have a note added, so other mappers know not to remap or retag. There's also abandoned:xyz and disused:xyz for items no longer there. Then they'll not render but a dotted line will appear in the edit view. See changeset/119903309 as to the what I did.

ciao

Hi,

You mapped a school with the same name as the adjacent building. Suggest you remove the names from the buildings and add it to the schoolgrounds as this will surely be flagged by QA.

Also, somewhere in you changeset changeset/119880291 you mapped a way that crosses another way without connecting them resulting in a warning. Connection is important as else routing will not function. Please fix.

Ciao

Hi,

sorry but your cleanup failed, in the example a forest should not have a outline or inner relation on a scree area when the scree area is not 360 degrees INSIDE the forest. I've removed several duplicate lines and used single line for the correct adjacent forest relations and added a shingle area as inner to the correct forest.

ciao

Hi,

Looks like you're leaving featureless lines behind. E.g way/36711314 is a building. Also something that looks like footways and a self intersection on a parking lot. Fixed, but as for the footpath right top of the parking, a guess. Please check.

ciao

Hi,

May I ask why religious buildings are related to border? There are it seems like hundreds in the region and all got the incorrect role at that which, IF they should be related, would have to be with inner role rather than outer role.

II ask is because all of these relations are flagged by OSM Inspector as incorrect in the Areas view https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?lon=17.97593&lat=50.87432&zoom=11

Awaiting your reply

Ciao

Hi,

You have a reputation of not responding to observations on your edit sets, yes you have and word goes around, and here you managed to map a footway arond a complex junction and only connect it at start and end but not the other dozen + crossing with trams, road, footways and whatnot, in fact after clicking connect on all the alerts the counter stopped at 30. Please pay attention to what you do.

Hai la reputazione di non rispondere alle osservazioni sui tuoi set di modifiche, sì, e gira la voce, e qui sei riuscito a mappare un marciapiede attorno a un incrocio complesso e collegarlo solo all'inizio e alla fine ma non le altre dozzine + incrocio con tram, strada, marciapiedi e quant'altro, infatti dopo aver cliccato su Collegati su tutti gli avvisi lo sportello si è fermato a 30. Per favore fate attenzione a quello che fate.

cheers

PS Also notified by PM. CS changeset/119865672

Hi

At least the south east half of the cycleway you tagged with paving stones cover, from where the residential area extends out across the street, has asphalt paving. I know because I cycle this way many times a year.

ciao

Hi,

First a mapper arrived 4 days ago to adjust the path, then you arrive yesterday to adjust the path again. What is this area relation tag on the footpath supposed to mean? Right now it shows as an unclosed footway area, a function that does not exist, if at all should be a pedestrian area. But, ground imagery shows a grass zone, and a path that's actualy steep steps with wooden railing next to a grass slope and a parking that has a ticket vending machine i.e. is a paid parking. At any rate, I've fixed what OSM Inspector has flagged, changed path to steps with railing. Fixed parking, added ticket vending machine. If path was meant to be an area it should be properly mapped in addition to the steps.

ciao

Hi

You mapped some areas in grassland and some given the inner role to the wrong grassland. Also you added some wetland zones without adding the inner role to the surrounding grassland (intentional?), Note that wetland can have sub-tags to qualify what kind of wetland this is such as wet_meadow. Please see wiki wetland=*

ciao

Hi,

I've closed the residential area relation flagged by OSM Inspector which you left open on the west side near the river area and a large building there. If the zone is larger it's up to you to complete the job.

ciao

Hi marko,

Is that bus stop middle of a motorway bridge near Antalya for real? Difficult to get there, you'd have to climb the guardrails to get on the road side.

Greetings from Italy

Popular this week to combine German and Turkish edits in 1 CS, First time mapper too now top of list bus stops in Germany and 1 more near Antalya, *middle of a motorway bridge*. A virtual trip there shows double guardrail on the bridge, no gap from footway behind it to main motorway, 2 lanes each direction. Have a hard time thinking of a bus stop there.

Glad you agree with what Osmose flagged is in essence correct... it's function is to signal issues which humans are then to assess as Yes, fix, No, false positive. Site is a good relational function to bind non-continuous objects. Duplication of information is bad. 10 parts of a street with same name and then all 10 parts having the name:etymology:wikipedia when there already is a street relation that binds the parts? The etymology key belongs on the relation. building relations no different, bridge area binds all the roads, footways, cyclepaths etc to cross, no need to repeat the structure of the bridge on each way, and on and on. The wiki is to me abundantly clear as to the appropriate utility in this case

"Rationale: A site relation is appropriate when a single real-world feature, with a common name and other common characteristics, cannot be accurately represented by a single geometry or by multiple areas forming a multipolygon. In other words, a site relation is appropriate when the feature must incorporate one or more point features or linear features that cannot be accurately replaced by areas."

The last sentence is the important bit, point or linear features.

Anyway, I'll go ahead and add the wikipedia link to the site relation where it belongs, no nonsense of 12x the same link.

ciao

Hi,

You made 7 water areas inner to the wrong Bare Rock zone. Duly Corrected.

Ciao

PS When you select an are to connect the relation to, here just start typing Bare. It will list 2 BR relation. The one that shows the grey outside the water is the right one. If you pick the wrong one the water edge takes on a greyish teint in edit mode, in this case. Would you have done it in forest, you'd see trees growing from the lake.
See CS changeset/119766002 for correction.

ciao

Hi Dieter

Osmose is upset over the same wiki reference being used on each section of the Aurelian Walls, like a dozen times. I'd propose that they're all removed from the wall sections and only left on the (site) relation. To my surprise the site relation does have the wikidata key, but not the wikipedia=it:Mura Aureliane one, JIC

ciao

PS Hitting ignore is pointless as Osmose will cycle throug each update and flags the next one and the next and then starts all over again.

Hi, e Benvenuto da OSM

Russian interface, Turkish change comment, edit in Weil am Rhein, Germany and Turkey, PLUS in my face in Italy. Why these edits in 1 change set so everyone in between gets to have this in their local history for days?

Pretty please don't, edit locally, save locally. Nobody in-between needs to know.

MTIA and happy mapping.

OK

Whatever is going on with country borders, more and more show up in Inspector meaning some element got misused. Saw Netherlands, Belgium now being flagged too.

Cheers

That's something I hate, lines top of lines. A single line can be used for multiple roles. I've seen one in France which was part of 9 different boundaries. The one I try to avoid using for other purposes is roads. Except for routing and road relations a no-go for me. As proposed, I'd take the forest edge and close it up.

ciao ancora