Hi

Whatever 'x' is supposed to mean as comprehensible comment, your merging of 3 farmland sections into a single multi-polygon broke the integrity. "layer: duplicate_segment
obj_type: r obj_id: 13578336"
Also your merging lost the history of what it was before.... there's no telling which part was corn and which cereal or why this land is tagged as fallow, meaning there's no active agriculture on this land for several years. The last imagery of ESRI suggests the land is in use. Did you survey to confirm the state is 'not-in-use'? Neither Bing shows this as in disuse.

ciao

This also closed a break in Prenestino-Centocelle \o/

Please be aware of the warning your edit caused "warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part" needing repair as what you did made the forest disappear from the rendered map.

node/9354116929

cheers

Hi there SarahDon,

Welcome to OSM.
You did buildings in Jordan, AND something in LonDon at the same time
on Armsby House causing everyone in-between to see this edit in their local change set list from England, to Algeria to Ukraine to the Sinai. On any future edits please only make changes in one country at the time, save and move to the next place. Ideally, the smaller the area covered the easier it is for other local mappers the review and understand.

Cheers and happy mapping.

You'll find quite a few of these 'w' and 'ù' suffixed fat finger typos of mine courtesy of my old keyboard. Not sure why I did not change it to parking=surface since I mapped both, the aisles added after inserting the hedges which made it no longer street_side. I'll make the correction.

Thanks for alerting.

ciao

Hi,

I've repaired your 'aggiornamenti' as you left the big orchard "layer: ring_not_closed obj_type: r
obj_id: 13567015"

see osm.org/edit?editor=id&relation=13567015

When closing an edit set, view it for any warnings. There's one on this one: warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part meaning the orchard did not have a complete ring. Normally ID Editor gives the warning before saving but not always which is why reviewing the edit set after saving is important.

cheers and happy mapping.

This correction was on a 5 year old issue :O)

Hi,

your change set generated 2 alerts of the warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part . Whatever you deleted yesterday in ways and nodes (deletion are hard to review). I had to repair MS residential area as it had disappeared from the map after OSM Inspector reported the triple open ends close to Via Vestina.

As for 'modifiche', the comment field is there to describe what you did... Changed road, added way, mapped track, add hamlet, in English or Italian, whatever you prefer. Reviewers than have an idea what went in the mapping work.

cheers

The fragmentation has been addressed which had it's origins in superfluous turn restrictions on 1 way streets connecting with 1 way streets. Humans will happily violate the traffic rules but navigators won't, 1 street close my house has double sized no-entry signs + elevated bright yellow kerbs and still the talking heads go straight against the traffic. Can't program for these.

ciao

The idiocy complete, yesterday Osmose signalled to add fuel:GTL_diesel, today Osmose signals this station does not. Hit the ignore button

Gas station update
16 Adriatica, Km. 433+170, nord 64028, SILVI
way/958797948 josm iD edit
fix-josm fix-edit
fuel:GTL_diesel

Hi,

According Osmose you missed 3 parts on Marruccini, so I fixed them

cheers

30376 1 5080 5080 similar name 1 E 14.31 42.41 way/207896445 (j) way/898436638 (j) Via dei Marrucini ✘ / ✔
30376 1 5080 5080 similar name 1 E 14.31 42.41 way/651607352 (j) way/898436638 (j) Via dei Marrucini ✘ / ✔
30376 1 5080 5080 similar name 1 E 14.31 42.41 way/898436637 (j) way/898436638 (j) Via dei Marrucini ✘ / ✔

Finally, with this oversized change set, a dozen a day crow-barring their way into my local history view, now I get it what this linked view does and how to use it to see where it actually hits the ground. Hit today on a farm track that had 20 nodes within 100 meters, virtually straight... a data import effort of 10 years ago. It's like those BAG imports in the Netherlands, Countless nodes per house in a row.

Thanks E de Wit, and Shaw_Sank may hope for redemption ;O)))

Hi, all indoor tagging needs levels, including the entrances such as those of garages, probably the corridors too. ;o)

BTW, There's a warning on this edit as above recorded, an easy way to get feedback on a CS just closed.

ciao

See the 'resolved' 1+3 above.

Follow Up: This in fact has closed open ends on 2 boroughs, Fusano and Palocco. The outlines on both are now closed.

Yup, restored the farmland rendering \o/

Hi

Thanks for your positive response.

Have a nice (mapping) day.

Rob

That's Villamagna :-)))

From the Netherlands to Java. Big job, though I see only 9 ways and 28 nodes being touched. Pretty please, next time save on a country by country basis. At 3800 change sets and use of JOSM not a big effort ;o)

TYMIA

NB previously mapped building extensions tagged as piers but really are just planks and arms from which the nets are hung.