Yup, it renders now... dry or MP was the issue.

ciao ciao

I've resolved the multipolygon issue for you as per my previous post. If you now look at the MP relation there are 2 coastline parts.
Rendering... Visited some other 'rock' and they've been mapped e.g. as place=islet and render, but in carto there's rendering priority so it's possible that a rock in the sea just shows underwater. In that more tagging is available at seamark:type=rock seamark:rock:water_level=dry.
The key has 32K uses. Added that just to see what happens. Tomorrow morning, CET, Osmose would send me a list of new problem issue that have my doings associated with it (I clear my list daily).

ciao

The 'fix' is 'simply' too easy, fools the system into accepting the MP by making it think it's the real deal. It requires the selection of any single polygon node and applying the scissor icon to it e voilà, you've got an MP.

:o)))

Don't quite understand why the Park multipolygon is referring to itself in the member list.... usually that throws an error in Osmose. TBD.

Reality is, I did not know what was changed and standard I then choose to keep the edit that was done by the prior mapper. Only when I revisited to do what I said I'd do did I learn that me keeping your edit resulted in some dozen sections of my edit loosing the MP link to the park relation.

As for the underscores in the wiki links I'm very aware, but as it stood, when visiting the link after saving it against wikipedia:it it proofed working perfectly fine. Makes me think the convention applies to wikipedia= only but then there are an immense mound of taggings with educated guessing required in the OSM system.

The wikidata tag did not need updating as that page does have multilingual references, pity though that they author did not insert the hyperlinks in the page. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1085735

My proficiency in that system is very limited, more chance to break it than make it.

Anyway, communicating up front is I think immensely better, makes friends not fiends.

ciao

Updated waste water plant with building and basins, a new type of construct not seen before in the dozens mapped, an inner and outer basin loop. Add fencing.

I had not expected any other reply. Since the system carries dozens of the 'incorrectly' formatted with those underscores, left unactioned, the mentioned 80 or so just in Italy, that's what monkeys do, they copy and then decided to wait on Osmose to flag me tomorrow with any issue on that item, but you did not give it a hope in heck. Rather than just deleting and in the meantime while i was active in that zone and continuously touching on the park outline it caused a conflict alert during saving. Not good. Don't understand any mapper jumping in, It would have been much more appreciated if you just had dropped me a note on my change set, no conflicts, no irritations.

As an OT, here's your Neis stats page: https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?user_5359 ... An interesting read.

cheers.

Hi,

You mapped many power windmills where I live some 5 months ago. Many have the description 'dismantled' but to OSM and Osmose that's meaningless. If physically removed they need to be deleted or tagged in such a way they cause no errors. Some spots have 2 WMs. Unlikely. Anyway, if they are dismantled but to stay than the tag disused or abandoned=yes needs adding. Right now the system demands power=generator be added on some 50 of those. Does not look good.

cheers

Hi,

The whole mapping world had your changeset delivered in the local CS history view, and the mapping world gets dozens delivered in that view of zero interest to the local mapper. No telling though as the comment just says it coastline fixing. I looked at Nun-Rock, it's now in a 1 member MULTIpolygon. That's incorrect AFAIK.

cheers.

Hi,

I added the Italian wiki link, after-all we're in Italy, or are we? The english wiki has no link through to the Italian which is why the addition. wikipedia:it is a legal code, at least some 80 uses per taginfo. Lest you have a solution, I'll change the main link to the Italian if you don't mind.

ciao

Hi

I'm surprised the Anello di Valle Giumentina does not include a side step to the historic site and eco museum. Both are within a stones throw distance. (so happen to just have mapped the areas, doing this whole Majella area momentarily)

Now if you know this area from walking, are all these heaps of rock in the landscape man made? From space it does not look natural.

ciao

No, it was a format i picked up from elsewhere, could have been a wiki. Detail i dont remember, only used few times.

There are many routes that have a / as suffix. 4/ and 4 both pass the nearest crossing to me. They do run not exactly same routes. Public transport users will know when to lift the hand as most stops here are hail and ride.

Routes by default must refer to route master. The route master lists the routes its master off. 😁

To me there's lots of duplication in the system. Those Must matching tags in both relations e.g. If in route master why repeat on the route too🤫

Thanks for your reply.

Hi,

If you change the route master ref, then the route ref needs to be updated too, so says Osmose. Je pense donc je suis" ;?
Anyway, colour/operator/ref now match on both parts.

Cheers

PS It was no typo, it was by an example, but it did look odd at the time, Whilst the army of 'latest new keys' fixers never stepped in.

Hi,

what you did is interesting. If you open up your change set in Id Editor and touch one of your "untagged for renderer" greens a wizard pops up, same for fairways adding the landuse=grass tag back in.

Did a complete 18 holes golf course in great detail and never have done any different than adding the landuse=grass tag and that was before ID Editor went nuts on wizards you cant escape and for greens and fairways the type of mowing of course such as grass=finely_mown on greens.. Never a complaint.

ciao.

FYI

Hi,
that none existing road pointed at eastward to a white line with just a name on it, same as the residential area. where I see in Carto standard that same name being rendered on the map i.e. what's the purpose?That would be flagged is Osmose as a tagless line.

cheers

Those Comments are to myself, nobody asked anybody to jump in while mapping is ongoing, it just tells the incidental tourist and lurker that I'm aware, working on it.

Certainly not going to change my commentaries on my own edit sets, that's for sure, then I know on the next revisit. Drop a mapper a note if you see the solution, much appreciated, and CS conflicts in the system avoided.

Cheers

That's not the point. I now cant save my set as a conflict is flagged and who's is right where? This has resulted in past in multithousand node lines being double written. Bad

Hi, not good you doing this edit while i'm mapping righto here. Now I've got a edit conflict sitting on a large CS.

Thanks for being patient and have left the room.

Hi, NoahTGL

Welcome to OSM, and surely you're aware that the purpose of the comment box is not 'hi', but rather to describe what changes/additions you made to the maps.... "added building, road, paths..."
Note the warnings (2). You mapped ways somewhere, but they are not connect at the crossing point. To router software that means no left/no right. Please check and connect.

cheers and happy mapping.

PS, please do map change saves on a local area basis, not that everyone between London, the West Bank
and Uganda gets to see these 'local' edits in their 'local' change history. This way only the people in the edited areas get to see and can review if they feel like it

Hi,

When you map a parking, you either map a way onto it (parking aisle), or in the case at the side of the road add the parking=street_side tag. Otherwise OSM can't plan a route to a parking.
Pedestrian crossings need a type tag e.g. crossing=zebra (strisce pedonale).
Mapping squares calls for adding a name or tag it noname=yes if it has no name.
When mapping buildings make sure they do not end up on top of a street/road/pedestrian way. Carefully look at the position and consider that many images are taken from a less than 90 degree angle i.e. where the roof is, is often not where the wall touches the ground. Certainly don't connect buildings to roads unless it's a garage entrance. The adjustments you find in osm.org/edit?changeset=114065174

cheers and happy mapping.