Hi,

Seems you're not of intend to follow my request to explain, or reply to the previous inquiry, what you are doing as "Eliminato segnalazione in OSM Inspector-AREAS" has absolutely no meaning to the reader of he comment, it requires opening the edit set and trying to understand WTHeck you actually did. Say 'duplicate line', 'relation open end', 'add inner role tag', something that makes sense and can then be further ignored when showing up in the history list.

TIA, again

cheers.

Hi, great stuff you did around Pescara, but will you be restoring the destination tags that were painstacking added to the various ways and come back tomorrow when Osmose has done it's diagnostics?

cheers.

Hi,

See you're at it again. This road is a main connection from Pescara Colli to Cappelle sul Tavo and in fact was upgraded at the Via Barco side recently with a main bypass road addition, in fact the Via Prati end should have been upgraded to tertiary, so that is what will happen shortly.

Till then, first things first, resolve the hundreds of problems on the issue list your name is attached to, and just keep your edit to the area you know, Naples.

ciao

Hi Finix,

Osmose is complaining about a place=suburb node without name. The map showed Portanuova in the very spot which seems kind of a right spot for it. Anyway the 11 year edit history looks odd, maybe put name Portanuova name back since no particular suburb outline was mapped. BTW The station reference wiki speaks of Porta Nuova https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pescara_Porta_Nuova_railway_station

cheers

Hi HK,

I did, took some digging, in changeset/98360609#map=16/39.3427/8.4164 cleared up a few dozen issues, so the change set says. Since some German wanderlust mapper made more changes to the trail. What I don't understand about foreign editors coming to Italy is that they make their edit comments most often in their tongue and not English or the local language.... as if on Sardegna they would understand '"Anpassungen wanderwegsituation". I very rarely do any comment in other than English simply because everyone would understand what was done, well almost all. There should be a wiki paragraph on that ;O)))

ciao

Hi,

All your "Eliminato segnalazione in OSM Inspector-AREAS" are meaningless descriptions to the persons that mapped the object area. Could you please add to your comment things like, open end, duplicate note or whatever, area intersection etc. Helps others learning and understanding their mistakes and loose ends.

TIA

Kindly fix what you broke with your edit

"Object tagged twice as way and relation
relation/12208838"

You made a change in Prague per your comment but did not mention you also made a change in Palma de Mallorca. No idea how one does that, so the question is, why would that happen, but half of Europe now has this showing in the resent change set history.

NB The mapped stream ending in the artificial pond continues en route and connecting too to the Alento, bending south following the scrub filled valley line.

Fatto (and touching it was a mistake as a number of problems surfaced on the park west side including tagless lines)

ciao

"Correction de sorties d’autoroute en France"

Sortie a Madagascar? That's a really really long route. ;O)

Kindly write what you do and do what you write, not more, not less in a single change set please. This should have been split in 2.

Hi,

It would be nice if you wrote a bit more than the (shouting) capitals "MODIFICA RELAZIONI" and made it like e.g. 'Modifica relazione trace D1'... then everyone knows what the relation and work was about without having to open the change set.

Question: There's a track named 'Da Serra a Passo Lanciano' but it changes half way to 'Serramonacesca Passo Lanciano'. Could this be made a uniform name, the former Da Serra a..." seems to be the correct/better designation. This link makes a reference to the track .... a Passo Lanciano https://www.parcomajella.it/d1-da-incrocio-sentiero-spirito-d2-serramonacesca-a-passo-lanciano.htm

cheers

And some ridges in the landscape too slim to map bare rock around it.

Hi, concur, the tag is on a way, rather than on the side where it really is, but thought to put the 2 together. Plz make the change. I believe there's shark teeth there too, but could misremember, so road_marking=give_way could be added too. As the traffic signal direction is in place, we know which way they're facing

Cheers and thx for setting me right.

outer scrub that is :O)))

Puin moet geruimd worden en waar gewerkt wordt vallen splinters. Sorry, maar het was 'puin' voorheen (gewoon incompleet) en je fietsroute werd daarbij over het hoofd gezien. Drama, maar nu zijn de toegestane fietsrichtingen correct gemapped.

ciao

Hi,

You closed the polygon, great, you changed the tag value from forest to wood w/o telling in your comment, not great! You did not add the 'inner' role tag as the area is inside the big grassland zone same as the other wood pockets were nearby. Lapse. As is a popular word amongst mappers around here: Fixed!

Your ever eyes wide open trying co-mapper ,o)

Thank you for contributing and tell every other mapper between San Francisco and Calcutta. They appreciate everyone keeps their edit sets local. Makes review lots easier by others... trust is good, blue eyes or not, verification is better.

cheers from Italy.

Hi,

Changed the actual name as per your comment from S.Maria to Santa Maria. OSM likes not using abbreviations.ù

cheers

PS Pure coincidence I saw this... I'm mapping all the area landcover on the Majella momentarily.

Which tag exactly?

In the quick remember cycle traffic lights and yield sign (in case the lights are off). Often see a false positive on the traffic_signals direction. KeepRight signals no problems, neither Osmose. Which QA prog give the warning?

Let me know the specific one and I'll recheck.