NB iD Editor 2.20.0 often does not warn on save, which was never the problem in 2.19.6. Worse, you tag inner or outer, get a warning on save, go back and see the tag took hold, yet the yellow blob comes up that the outer/inner tag was not applied. Really slows editing down these false positives. At times it takes even 5-10 seconds or never for any alert to show. Edit in fully updated Vivaldi on Chrome engine, all permissions granted.

PS tweak road position and add farm track.

It's funny how when the last editor was yourself it's 'improvement' but if you were not it's a fix... goodies, for you adding the operator and vat ref to McD

Just looked at your stats and your errors and warnings tally is skyrocketing, 1800 total now, as are your 'ignored' warning, way past 300. Just why you have 822 reversals to your name should have one wondering what's on with your contributions.

Have a good mapping day. ;o)

hi there,

I'm still here, waiting on my Covid shot, domani. It's funny to see bus stops on the south side of Vespucci when it's 1 way east to west there. I've noticed in one alert if a bus stop if tagged to a route and it's on the other side of a road it's flagged as being on the wrong side, but these are not linked. These particularly I took a picture of, at least 2 are of the 19th century model, probably from way before Vespucci for the majority part became 1-way. Historic relics.

ciao

... again

Sorry, no idea why I landed here but when I'm in Italy and edit sets appear in my local change set history I look why someone creates half Europe noticing edits with maproulette, I look.

PS The cliff side points to the left, the little triangles have to point to the lower side i.e. the river I think. Just right click on line and hit the << symbol to reverse the cliff direction.

This is really very very strange. There was a frana mapped, 6-8 months ago, by you I think to remember. I cycled the path and found the same approaching from the bridge. Then another mapper n34s changed it as okay again. I tried the path again and found the repair near invisible, solid 4 wheel track, cycled from the bridge all the way to the A14 underpass. Now you are reporting the path has collapsed again. Is this a different location?

Don't have the GPS trace anymore to see where it was I turned around on the vary narrow path before ending in the river, which is why I'm asking.

cheers

Question is, why did you edit 2 relations in what looks like Siberia and then 2 ways on the US west coast. Each should have been done and saved separately. With JOSM I'm told it's rather easy to split the save creating very small bound boxes.

Note the help names of the scrub types will be removed when mapping has finished. Unfortunately there's no visual feedback of the density tag selected, all renders identical.

Hi,

I've inspected the whole stretch and added the traffic signs to the side of the road of Lungofino. Basically, some is 70, a lot is 50, and most all is no overtaking. While there, adjusted/added some road names per corner signs, added lanes/paving type. Where Lungofino starts is unclear. The first sign is where the 2nd sign at the corner says Via Imperato (name added to road).

If you see something wrong or have addition information let me know and we can discuss.

ciao

Global janitorial should be used judiciously. I bet data consumers know rather well about standard deviations in tagging so whether debit_card or debit_cards, credit_card or credit_cards or creditcards, they'll be captured properly in the correct slot, tomorrow there will be a debit_card again. Case in point, I looked at a drop down list for a certainly available value and there were 3 variations, still with iD Editor's 2.20.0 NSI's fed drop down lists, a ladi-dah, a ladi_dah and a ladidah, only to learn from taginfo which is the commonly used.
Blame?.. my double ristretto has not kicked in yet, global mappers are aware, the opening salvo comment with each in the series shows awareness it reaches into most every mappers history view and as said, data consumers, who's maps is what the end user looks at, know too about the value variations.

Just a consideration when going global 'error' netting.

PS I've deleted your road duplications.

Hello

Please DONT map roads on top of already existing roads. If you did not notice you had 20 warnings with this edit. If a road has a name or a section and you have a source:name reference than add the name to the existing road to the section that carries that name.

ciao

Hello

Please DONT map roads on top of already existing roads. If you did not notice you had 10 warnings with this edit.

ciao

Maybe you should have waited on a response on your first global edit to include that one was replacing 1 invalid/imprecise tag with another. Neither payment:debit_cards or credit_cards is proper.

Actually payment:debit_cards is as invalid / imprecise a payment method tag as payment:debit_cards. Should not be used at all. payment:maestro would be a valid one, but globally it varies by country like here payment:bancomat=yes would be a correct debit card key. Same goes for payment:credit_cards, imprecise and flagged.

But anyway, thanks for yet 3 or more global edit I had no desire at all to see in my local edit history list.

Hi,

Whilst you have resolved dozens of issues, it may be a good idea to review what you mapped as when you saved it with iD Editor there were 30+ warnings

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 26
warnings:impossible_oneway:highway 3
warnings:mismatched_geometry:vertex_as_point 1
warnings:missing_tag:descriptive 3

highway-highway should be easy, roads crossing and no connecting node, impossible, a oneway the wrong e.g..

From little Italy.

Hi,

Coincidental passer by... Just noticed the forest areas mid river were invisible in the map rendering, which is why. They seem to be permanently above water so tagged them to be that.

PS added a small building near the end of the added path, possibly a refugio.