Question is, why did you edit 2 relations in what looks like Siberia and then 2 ways on the US west coast. Each should have been done and saved separately. With JOSM I'm told it's rather easy to split the save creating very small bound boxes.

Note the help names of the scrub types will be removed when mapping has finished. Unfortunately there's no visual feedback of the density tag selected, all renders identical.

Hi,

I've inspected the whole stretch and added the traffic signs to the side of the road of Lungofino. Basically, some is 70, a lot is 50, and most all is no overtaking. While there, adjusted/added some road names per corner signs, added lanes/paving type. Where Lungofino starts is unclear. The first sign is where the 2nd sign at the corner says Via Imperato (name added to road).

If you see something wrong or have addition information let me know and we can discuss.

ciao

Global janitorial should be used judiciously. I bet data consumers know rather well about standard deviations in tagging so whether debit_card or debit_cards, credit_card or credit_cards or creditcards, they'll be captured properly in the correct slot, tomorrow there will be a debit_card again. Case in point, I looked at a drop down list for a certainly available value and there were 3 variations, still with iD Editor's 2.20.0 NSI's fed drop down lists, a ladi-dah, a ladi_dah and a ladidah, only to learn from taginfo which is the commonly used.
Blame?.. my double ristretto has not kicked in yet, global mappers are aware, the opening salvo comment with each in the series shows awareness it reaches into most every mappers history view and as said, data consumers, who's maps is what the end user looks at, know too about the value variations.

Just a consideration when going global 'error' netting.

PS I've deleted your road duplications.

Hello

Please DONT map roads on top of already existing roads. If you did not notice you had 20 warnings with this edit. If a road has a name or a section and you have a source:name reference than add the name to the existing road to the section that carries that name.

ciao

Hello

Please DONT map roads on top of already existing roads. If you did not notice you had 10 warnings with this edit.

ciao

Maybe you should have waited on a response on your first global edit to include that one was replacing 1 invalid/imprecise tag with another. Neither payment:debit_cards or credit_cards is proper.

Actually payment:debit_cards is as invalid / imprecise a payment method tag as payment:debit_cards. Should not be used at all. payment:maestro would be a valid one, but globally it varies by country like here payment:bancomat=yes would be a correct debit card key. Same goes for payment:credit_cards, imprecise and flagged.

But anyway, thanks for yet 3 or more global edit I had no desire at all to see in my local edit history list.

Hi,

Whilst you have resolved dozens of issues, it may be a good idea to review what you mapped as when you saved it with iD Editor there were 30+ warnings

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 26
warnings:impossible_oneway:highway 3
warnings:mismatched_geometry:vertex_as_point 1
warnings:missing_tag:descriptive 3

highway-highway should be easy, roads crossing and no connecting node, impossible, a oneway the wrong e.g..

From little Italy.

Hi,

Coincidental passer by... Just noticed the forest areas mid river were invisible in the map rendering, which is why. They seem to be permanently above water so tagged them to be that.

PS added a small building near the end of the added path, possibly a refugio.

Thanks for contributing to OSDM. Just why the Korea peninsula and US east coat in one edit set. Few will comprehend but you should know every mapper in-between is forced to see this in their local change set history list. Did you want that to happen? Please split your edits per country and save them separately.

Many thanks in advance.

PS 'MO' is not a proper change set comment description. Write in word what you did. There's a wiki discussing the good bad and ugly.

Your changeset of yesterday has so far necessitated me to restore and repair 21 broken highway continuity issues flagged in Osmose. PLZ STOP. You evidently do not to understand the inter-relation of various streets and road ratings and why they are what they are.

Fix includes resolving flag "Wrong highway on roundabout"

What's bad is that ALL CS's by wheelmap uses the default "Modified via wheelmap.org". Can't possibly believe they cannot put proper descriptive comments in, even the level 0 bare bones editor allows to overwrite the generic comment text. Something for the chiefs to address with she/him/them. Popular last few days... somewhere up north and then as cherry a node in the ME or Far East.

It IS a deal when confronted with these a dozen times a day, and 90% always seem to come from the same corner on this planet. Maybe this could be made a talking point at the local chapters of OSM contributors. A permanent footnote on every wiki page. "Map Local in a session, map within your borders. U Too!"

Thanks for the assist on this goal. route SP58 is done.

The SP58 sign is on the wrong side of the rotonda. I'll amend, triple ref :O)))

ON majella, more and more signs get replaced. My source is a visit to the buro of tourism in Pretoro. All their material is j, as it was last year in Sant'Eufemia. She said it's has some international reasoning behind it... a foreigner phonetically hears a j and will search with that spelling. It's wurst to me long as it's consistent.