OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
156356807

And no one who's done the hot potato of the half dozen flixbus routes, still looping around the ol trombetta. I'd leave that to Armondo, whence he finds out.

156356807

BTW, there's 4 editors mapping in that SS16-SS714 roundabout zone last 3 days....

156356807

No need, except for Luciani I'd connect directly to the flare top to resolve the level change issue and simplify routing steps. How a bus driver coming off the attrezzato is going to make that turn to the right lord knows, probably a full loop and then a turn onto Carmelo and thru onto Luciani is advised but see no such sign as e.g. at Ortona station exit.

There's one yield/roundabout traffic sign that needs to go absent the direct connect

ciao

BTW, the cops actually blocked the Carmelo exit on Saturday thusly all could not be traced then.

156356807

Hi,

Do not follow why you changed the geometry of Luciano. I've cycled it a few times and the traces and the experience is it direct connects to the roundabout, not that change twisr unless they added that overnight on Sunday, while the police was monitoring traffic flow
on Saturday when the junction opened.

At any rate QA now flags this as inconsistent level connections.

155944647

Hi,

ID got it wrong on crossings... crossing=* is to say what the type is, traffic_signal, uncontrolled, unmarked etc. Someone even inserted a line "crossing=marked (used by iD preset) - with crosswalk, with or without traffic lights", but that does not legitimize it... anyone can edit the wikis.
The crossing:marking is not =yes, it's meant to say e.g. zebra. It's like the many barrier=yes, which is meaningless.... barrier=gate/block/fence tells what they are. The root wiki actually says "crossing:markings=* - to tag the existence and style of pedestrian crossing markings"... zebra, rainbow, there's a whole bunch of esoteric styles, allowing to also add the colours of the markings.
In short now we have a bunch more BeeEs tagging combos from the ID automaton.... crossing=marked + crossing:markings=yes, doesn't look good, neither adding another version to the object history for nop.
One of the many reasons I very rarely use ID to include it's poor poor handling of relations in any form, but that's a debate of it's own and endless.

ciao ciao

153197884

Errata... actually the deletions were in this CS changeset/153109443 "rimosso terreno agricolo ". No alerts remain in the area by OSMI momentarily. My cleaning of the MP was here changeset/155961383#map=19/45.865182/10.939339

153197884

Hi

I've deleted the 2 member farmland relation on areas with buildings since the surrounding farmland parts were deleted. (Most looks more like vineyards, but that's all I can judge from above. Best practise is you map the individual plots which makes all these complex multipolygons superfluous anyway.

happy mapping.

155936801

Ciao,

Credo che dopo 7755 set di modifica si conoscano i problemi segnalati sopra... close vertices, highway crossing building, highway/highway crossing. Questi avvisi vengono visualizzati prima della chiusura del set di modifica. Ne ho corretti alcuni. Per favore, controllate i problemi rimanenti.
mille grazie a tutti

155375103

👍👍👍

155375103

The groynes not affixed to land being part of the relation looks odd, I wouldn't.
In a few hours OSMI should be updating. It's strange for this issue showing up 8 days after the last mod on the rel also highlighting the relations for the sub areas in the south and see now sow blue lines and duplicate ways being flagged
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.83321&lat=39.78057&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cwayshttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.83321&lat=39.78057&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways incl a isle offshore.

TTYL

155375103

Seems you have broken something as now the country outline lights up in OSM Inspector. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.51358&lat=43.69502&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please check

155702984

Salve,

Hi,

I fontanella e dentro o fuori i edifice? I posizione e dentro momentanemento

ciao

cioa

caio

155401078

Misplaced and duly removed.

155524923

Ciao,

sei sicuro di aver aggiunto il tag landuse=grass in quanto ora il cimitero sembra un prato. Penso che il cimitero originale:sector sia sufficiente + ref, immagino che tu abbia cambiato il tag per motivi di rendering.
ciao

155414243

Hi,

Change set from France to Greece all these far apart viewpoints in one change set, which is bad, change sets should be done by country at most, see best practice wiki, and you saw them all, did you? No mention how you acquired the information which the reviewers sure would like to know. Survey, travel catalog, google maps?
None of them have the tags for viewing directions, none a name, quite a few here have, to tell visitors what they're looking at.

Please let us know.

155180227

errata: Il primo set di modifiche è stato anche invertito dal sistema, il contatore dice 2 ma c'è solo 1 nella storia.

155180227

Ho rimosso i tag name/name:ro in romeno poiché è ovvio che PLUS il mappatore è scomparso dopo 2 modifiche 8 anni fa. Probabilmente anche la prima modifica ha bisogno di una revisione.

ciao

155180227

Hi, just noticed on a few of your 'classic taggings' of bus stops... why does one have a romanian name in Italy and translated something like Bocca di humore (mouth of humor)

I think 'pullman per Metaponto' is also 'suspect'.

ciao

node/4428208593

155136778

Hi,

It's a hum on this one.... some dozen corrections to your go map! works... change/add buildings, make sure not to overlap them with ways, self intersecting ways, embankment being retaining wall and more.

ciao

155027572

Hi,

What is ele=6m supposed to mean on this icecream parlor?
node/944246120
The m is not needed as OSM is default metric, but ele on a shop???
When specifying payment coins/notes you don't need to state payment:cash... duplication.

ciao