Hi,

QA has a warning out that the 'from' tag is missing from this relation relation/10631197 which the name suggests is Termoli. According the history you removed it in the second last edit but left the 'to' in place so suspect this was just a slip off the keyboard.

ciao.

Hi,

Query: Is this new tracking tag only to be used on individual mapped panel assemblies like here or can it also be used on farms? Asking because JOSM did add the tag but gives an warning when put on farms. Osmose also throws a spanner the next day. Nothing is said on that in the wiki and the pictures going with the various various values implies it's OK for plants too.

ciao

BTW, a 'no' on roof mounted panels is a bit of a stretch on my imagination but maybe you do that because there's no degrees direction value on them (and yesterday updated a park that has a few thousand panels lined up due east, yes. Clarification in the wiki could be helpful.

hmmm, I loaded the zone again and once more the roundabout has double sections, one having the turn restrictions, the other uncut circle the flixbus relations. Also no idea why you started editing other stuff outside your route. Was not asked for. Just apply your route to the roads as is, not more not less. No objections to cut up roundabouts to avoid these silly full loops which the drivers obviously don't do either, they take the shortest way on-off.

v.v "also make the roundabout as one way", roundabouts when drawn in the proper direction don't need to be oneway tagged unless you meant the roundabout as a single line way. That of course can't be with the turn restrictions.
Anyway double ways is no go and has me concerned this is not happened elsewhere as well with whatever tools you use to fix Flixbus routes.

I use JOSM and I know it can, but avoid any mucking with their route order. Doesn't matter where one touches a road with a Flixbus link and PT reports problems by the bushel, no different today over at Peligna Pratola where a roundabout was incorrectly mapped with shortcuts. Sure enough this odd full looping is wholly unnecessary.

ciao

Hi,

Seeing you modded this route just before me, I may have broken 552 at the Treglio roundabout, way/364117986
Certainly did not sort the 2x552 route members as there are just too many, 1209 on 1 of the 552s. Recommended is max 300 (super routes may be solution to think about).

The problem here was there were 2 roundabouts mapped on top of each other. One had the turn restrictions and the other the Flixbus links. Deleted latter and moved route links to the remaining one. (one classed as service, one as unclassified at that as well, for years).

So you're aware.
Ciao

OK, thanks for that, just looked very odd only considering the forest section.

buona mappatura

Sorry, there was a long powerline anchored by a node to the ground... removing the offending node made the BBox pretty big.

Ciao,

Perché le descrizioni dei set di modifiche sono solo 'a' o 'z'? Per favore, fornisci delle descrizioni adeguate o dovremo annullare le modifiche senza sapere perché l'hai fatto.

Grazie

PS hai salvato le modifiche elencando diversi avvisi che l'editor ID segnala "prima" del caricamento!

NB: The 641 member forest MP relation needs splitting. Recommended max size is 300.

Ciao gianni55,

v.v. way/1228587154
Personalmente ritengo che il 'nome' di carrareccia non esista e ne anche width=0 su una 'carrareccia' agricola sia reale. La cosa migliore da fare è rimuovere entrambi i valori.

ciao

Hi,

yes, should have been farmland=field. Plz proceed to correct

thanks

Definitely. Plz proceed to turn these to =yes

ciao

Seems 2 QA progs disagree, but the last bit can supposedly be written as Dec 25,26 off

Hi,

Fixed shop... broke opening_hours. Plz 'fix'

ciao

Ping,.. Attenzione, Messaggio Privato.

Hi,

The crossing was flagged by QA, I was really confused by the tags on this zebra, add 'unmarked', but down it says the crossing is marked, Merged 2 sequential crossings into a crossing line with traffic island. Well visible in Bing

ciao

crossing:island=no
crossing:markings=yes
crossing=uncontrolled;unmarked
highway=crossing
tactile_paving=no

As per the note, relation/285964 should be relatively easy to split since large zones have hardly any 'inner' objects such as the NE branch.

Hi,

thanks for replying. I gave it pause absent your reaction. Phase I the major outer an inner outlines is done, members down from 2303 to 1872, now deciding where to place the cuts where convenient. Often major roads are used as natural borders except there's not much here. Also Osmose reports many many inner area overlaps needing cleaning as else JOSM will just bombard with validation warning.

Got the area saved on my drive using JOSM and first thing I do each day is refresh the area to make sure I've got all the changes. Long as you don't do anything that touches on relation/155024 after 4:00 PM we should have no conflicts.

I'm working on Gran Sasso park presently homing in on the end stretch. I do inner first by rule and only then do the areas allowing to pre-decide where to lay the splits. Used even long farm tracks to realize this.

TTYL
Rob

The one in San Clemente I updated yesterday, and then Osmose whining this morning it no longer serves GTL diesel has the right lat/lon per the register with matching address of Via San Clemente so the one in Torre de' Passeri on the SP would be logically the one with the wrong MISE. Given that there are 3 fuel stations in Passeri and only 2 in the lastly 7.1.2023 updated register it gives yet another one has surfaced that is not 'registered'. That list is growing.

OK, grazie, sto mappando la copertura del suolo da 2 mesi intorno al Parco Nazz. del Gran Sasso e mi sono imbattuto in queste immagini solo perché creano un'ombra molto lunga nelle immagini satellitari. Ora so cosa potrebbe essere aggiungendo altro paesaggio.

ciao

Ciao Stefano

Guardando i tag delle 2 torri che hai mappato qualche mese fa, puoi confermare che la costruzione 'tiranti' è quella indicata in questo wiki per tower:construction=guyed_lattice ?

tower:construction=guyed%20lattice?uselang=en

Sei sicuro che ci sia un misuratore di velocità del vento (anemometro) in cima a queste torri alte 40 metri o è o anche per la ricezione / trasmissione radio o cellulare?

Grazie
Rob