routing incl pedone ;o)

Francamente, come questi dati siano finiti nell'OSM dal vivo è un enigma per me, ho già spostato e rimosso delle vere e proprie assurdità con strade che passano direttamente attraverso gli edifici. Non si dice chi sia la fonte dei dati e se questi siano autorizzati a essere importati in OSM.

Salute

errata, i signali

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1070&zoom=17&lat=41.836436&lon=14.600272&level=2&tags=&fixable=

Ciao

"dati verificati su fonti open". Non credo che sia così, perché molti edifici si trovano sopra le vie mappate in passato. Si prega di correggere.

Grazie

Hi,

I nomi dei serbatoi di emergenza sono "generici" e quindi non devono essere inseriti come nomi. L'ho notato solo perché sembra che tu stia copiando da qualche altra parte con l'aggiunta di uno spazio suffisso, come ha fatto un altro mappatore nella zona.

ciao

Hi,

Per your CS alert "warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part "could you please finish mapping the forest outline as right now it's broken and no longer rendering

thanks

PS

Level 1-2-3 is actually an Osmose flag, yup,

You can hit ignore on the pins. It's true, have a turning circle which one would expect for that to be the end of the way near an another way and that warning pops up. Most of the times there's actually a footway of some kind to continue but if the top (say northbound) of the turning circle e.g. has a guard_rail east west and then a road east west, and that's within 15 meters, the analysers want the assertion that it truly is the end, no foot or other connection that could be used to continue. I look for any path and else put the noexit=yes just on the turning_circle in that case, nothing nefarious as intentionally hiding.

Hallo

heb per ongeluk gekeken en de vraag rees hoe use_path te rijmen is met de absentie van een gemapt fietspad?
Vroeg me ook af qua routing hoe men van het 1 way tussenstuk op fiets naar de parallelle fietspad komt. Tegen het verkeer in? Als er een weg is dan misschien informeel mappen met highway=cycleway+cycleway=link. Nu moet je op de hoofdweg fietsen tot de Bella Vista voordat je over kunt switchen.

Hi

I think that was the legacy code used at the time no ptv tag was present when i was closing endless gaps in routes and i think Osmose was prompting. Now adays it would be 1 or 2 depending on if a routemaster is linked or not, so JOSM would be flagging while fixing routes.
Correcting? Just because platform was deprecated does not make it wrong. Platform in the human readable equivalent of 1, but I'll have a look at this one and surely when updating the whole thing starts snowballing again as it always does when touching a Rome street that has a PT route association and sure enough testing a few whether 1 or 2 the validation errors flagged for all touched by the 981 e.g., something ID hardly does, IS beyond believe to include newly added route gaps. 981 went from v69 i last touched is to v76. Would need some serious dedicated time to sort all this mess out. Sigh.

Cheers

Hi,

Fixed some routing issues on your Arielli-Petriccio of type "Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle". Tested the GraphHopper/Valhalla bicycle route from P to A and A to P.

osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=42.36272%2C14.39968%3B42.38586%2C14.35689
osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=42.3859%2C14.3569%3B42.3627%2C14.3997#map=15/42.3738/14.3783

The OSRM bicycle route does a big detour but since I know Komoot & Bosch Connect do the route correctly along the Petriccio, think it's a OSRM specific problem.

ciao

Strange this Area Pedonale sign. There's club Barracude and other beach businesses and residents there, so traffic in summer. Have cycled that way often. Other side no vehicles sign which used to be a no-entry. Anyway I cycle it both ways because every meter not on the Adriatica is a save meter. Propose you add a oneway:bicycle=no as exception so the route works both ways + vehicle=destination.

ciao

Hi

Don't know why you did this but there were 2 orchard relations created for the same area

1) with 2 members
relation/16108185
2) with 36 members
relation/16108186

Propose you delete the relation with 2 and add the one inner member to the 2) multipolygon as inner

cheers

Ciao e benvenuto in OSM

Questo lavoro è di qualità molto scadente con oltre 200 problemi, vede sopra, per lo più vie incompiute o nessuna connessione in caso di attraversamento. Per favore, rivedete e completate il lavoro in modo da poter camminare da qualsiasi punto a qualsiasi punto per il quale avete mappato attraversamenti, passi e passaggi pedonali.

Grazie

Hi,

Saw your revert on revert in the country report and compared how tags on the road mesh with the tags on the parallel path mapped bicycle designated. If use is obligatory I'd do away with a lot and add bicycle=use_sidepath foot=use_sidepath but given the heavy non-conclusive and long discussion on the German community forum I suppose there's no 1 size fits all. I'd certainly test with GraphHopper and OSRM to see how routes come out from north of the 2 bridges to north of the 2 bridges.

way/756214911
way/585245587

Ciao
Rob

Hi,

Oneway? Questa parte è certamente

way/860215932

Buone mappatura nel ombra

Something to research, everywhere the main road is named Viale Filippo Masci. Eurospin has that street name listed on their web site aka Chieti 3, BUT, big neon letters on their brand new supermarket facade 'Via Masci' as their location name reference. YCMTU

Think that is sensible. The name:ru tag labels have no reason to be removed whatever the opinion about individuals who speak this language.

Hi,

Revert perché, quale change set ref? È buona norma menzionare questi fatti nei commenti al set di revert.

grazie

Errata, reduced forest relation memberships from 179 to 167.

Hi

A tunnel at layer=0 does not seem right. If it's an abandoned railway tunnel turned hike/bike way like we have quite a few here, it would need layer=-1 and the motorway tunnel below -2.

Just me 2 cents

ciao