Check in StreetComplete right now and see if the northern elevated part looks higher or not, Just happen to know a thing or 2 about the mechanisms. And once more, a top adage in QA... write what you do and do what you write.

Yes, the building= tags needed to be changed to building:part on the elements.

Oh and from your wiki

"Use building:part=yes for parts of the building which only have different attributes (building:levels=* and height=*)"

i.e. all the parts are =yes and the main body is building=civic.

I'm restoring the relation in proper.

Please restrict yourself to what you write in the comment... "fix tag..." . Do more, write it, dont leave people guessing and Nobody asked you to change the parts geometry and layering which was fine in 3D rendering.

Hi,

Why did you delete the building relation?

Hi Astra

This little basin is tagged with an inner role to grassland far away: way/120595395/history

But, the actual grassland around the basin that shows in 2km zoom i.e. was there before last Friday when 2km and greater zoom out updates, has disappeared in 1km and greater zoom.

There's also a few warnings on the CS about highway-waterway crossing (see CS summary)

Anyway you know surely where the fix(es) need to be applied

ciao from the Abruzzi

And another problem bit the dust.... cathedral now rendering in proper hue.

If there is a single node on a crossing as a sum of all individual traffic signals then it's appropriate to use the all directions tag. I prefer mapping the pedestrian and various traffic signals per street and crossings also because of the noted 1 way streets that wont have a signal, bar that for pedestrians.
Anyway, I see the crossing type is uncontrolled so it's correct to remove the directions tag, which I don't remember why I added it at all, some QA prog maybe probably had given an erroneous flag.

BTW see now the 'Ponte Ognissanti' name on the table crossing node. First time I see crossing nodes having a name.

ciao

BTW, countless people forget the direction tag on signals, stops/yield, traffic signs in general.

direction=both refers to the traffic_signals. The correct for that is actually traffic_signals:direction, just to keep it simple ;O)))

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/traffic_signals:direction

Sometimes I actually enter the degrees exact, with a crossing that have 1 or more one ways joining. Then Osmose/OSMI gives a false warning of 'may need traffic_signals:direction'. Hit ignore button.

ciao

Errata: Something to know: If there's a conflict of naming for instance with a Toponomastica, the wiki is clear: Name signs on road supersede, and apparently this was recently reconfirmed over at Italian Telegram where someone went about changing long street names to the short Via Cavour, where they were before the full name of the count.

cheers

Oh, and indeed I see now I was the name change maker :o)))

That's funny, my change versions area V6+V7 and before at V4-V5 you made changes to that way with that name, so I think you're asking the wrong person.

That said since it's 'Ponte' and the name extends across the bridge, it might very well be around there and sure enough, west-end of the bridge is the sign, pointing west. Propose you add the tag source:name=sign and description:it= segna da ponte or similar.

ciao

Hi,

If you wonder why almost nothing renders on your WIP area, wrong type. The cathedral in Chieti will tell you the correct once although that one has still something wrong indicated by the non-religious building colour render in Carto.

ciao

thx for putting my intended note in the right place. Baumschule just does not translate very well into OSM tagging.... plants are not trees, me thinketh, and the universal translator makes it asilo in italain (asylum, asyl) which is truly funny.

caio.

Repaired 3 more bus routes at Pz di Saxa Rubra in 3 more CSs.

Hi,

Did repairs of your junction change sistemazione at Pz Saxa Rubra in CS changeset/129428267 to include 5 bus routes broken as signalled by Osmose. There are more routes passing here of which I'm not sure if still whole.

ciao

Ciao e benvenuto in OSM

La tua strada pedonale è stata rimossa mentre la mappavi in ​​cima al corridoio del parcheggio. Ho contrassegnato il corridoio del parcheggio con la presenza di un marciapiede

Felice mappatura

Ciao e benvenuto in OSM

Dov'è 'Viale dei pini' o 'Viale dei Pini'(?) a cui ti riferivi nell'indirizzo del cimitero? Indicare la strada interessata e la fonte: nome che si presume sia la strada che passa per il cimitero.

Inoltre, non fare riferimento due volte allo stesso oggetto. Il cimitero è già mappato come oggetto area. Il tag amenity=cemetery dovrebbe essere rimosso, ma dovrebbe essere aggiunto addr:city=Picciano. Lo stesso nodo dell'indirizzo di localizzazione rende evidente già a cosa si riferisce.

Buona mappatura.

Well, when you were about to save your change set you had a warning of 5 per the summary above. I only noticed because this global edit set crow barred itself into my little Italy corner change set history view and opened it to see if it affected my regular area of mapping, said corner. Did not, so I FYI'd you on the notice and closed. The probability is that if you open up your personal Osmose and OSMI problems listing, they will include these. E.g today my list, which is short and kept short includes: "The tag `landuse=reservoir` is deprecated in favour of `natural=water`+ `water=reservoir`", so I fix that in a minute.

The summary of the issues of items you touched you find at https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Arctic%20gnome

Anyway, you commented in the CS 'time zones', so best guess it is related to those tags.

ciao

Just select the V1 piece in ID Editor edit view. The sidepanel should list 18 relations lest someone came in and made other changes afterwards