OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
114627079

Included adding an abandoned building.

114523718

Hi

Took Osmose only 2 hours to question if this is a male, female or unisex hairdresser.
"suspicious tag combination
female=yes together with male=yes
node/7991098259
unisex = yes ?
female=yes
male=yes

Suspect unisex
ciao

114423580

Hi,

Msg from Italy which I'm borrowing from another mapper who's much more eloquent than I am.

"Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hint: north-west corner of your bounding box."

It escapes me why a Canadian park edit and something in/near China have to be in the same change set causing everyone to see this edit in the local CS history view, near top, for days on end if they don't select a specific one. I'm told JOSM is very good at splitting edited parts in one session. Not to see them has been long on the wish list but seemingly an Everest climb worth of difficulty to resolve for regular base line users like me (and they are most all).

MTIA for your consideration.

114331401

Hi,

Your change set generated several issues in the QA reporting.

1)Duplicate edge: Don't draw line or road along an area. Separated.
2)You mapped a one way street without a vehicle exit. Added
3)Living street tagging simplified per sign, 'access=residents' (eccetto rewsidenti)
4)Second 1 way cant be 1 way as that causes a no way out for cars. There's a planter(added), so made it a bidirectional alley.
5), you really need to start making building square when they are. Select building outline, right click with mouse and menu shows a box or slect line and hit the Shift+Q key. Hit that to make angles 90 degrees. Works on anything, including parking.
6) added stop signs and building at parking-.
7) A Parking that is not connected to a service rd or parking aisle requires the parking=street_side tag.

Thanks for extending the Arielli stream. The origins have been a riddle for longer.

Happy mapping and you have questions how or why, please do ask.

CS changeset/114358341

114320211

Victoire, renders.

114284569

Yup, it renders now... dry or MP was the issue.

ciao ciao

114284569

I've resolved the multipolygon issue for you as per my previous post. If you now look at the MP relation there are 2 coastline parts.
Rendering... Visited some other 'rock' and they've been mapped e.g. as place=islet and render, but in carto there's rendering priority so it's possible that a rock in the sea just shows underwater. In that more tagging is available at seamark:type=rock seamark:rock:water_level=dry.
The key has 32K uses. Added that just to see what happens. Tomorrow morning, CET, Osmose would send me a list of new problem issue that have my doings associated with it (I clear my list daily).

ciao

114284569

The 'fix' is 'simply' too easy, fools the system into accepting the MP by making it think it's the real deal. It requires the selection of any single polygon node and applying the scissor icon to it e voilà, you've got an MP.

:o)))

114299803

Don't quite understand why the Park multipolygon is referring to itself in the member list.... usually that throws an error in Osmose. TBD.

114288179

Reality is, I did not know what was changed and standard I then choose to keep the edit that was done by the prior mapper. Only when I revisited to do what I said I'd do did I learn that me keeping your edit resulted in some dozen sections of my edit loosing the MP link to the park relation.

As for the underscores in the wiki links I'm very aware, but as it stood, when visiting the link after saving it against wikipedia:it it proofed working perfectly fine. Makes me think the convention applies to wikipedia= only but then there are an immense mound of taggings with educated guessing required in the OSM system.

The wikidata tag did not need updating as that page does have multilingual references, pity though that they author did not insert the hyperlinks in the page. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1085735

My proficiency in that system is very limited, more chance to break it than make it.

Anyway, communicating up front is I think immensely better, makes friends not fiends.

ciao

114298706

Updated waste water plant with building and basins, a new type of construct not seen before in the dozens mapped, an inner and outer basin loop. Add fencing.

114288179

I had not expected any other reply. Since the system carries dozens of the 'incorrectly' formatted with those underscores, left unactioned, the mentioned 80 or so just in Italy, that's what monkeys do, they copy and then decided to wait on Osmose to flag me tomorrow with any issue on that item, but you did not give it a hope in heck. Rather than just deleting and in the meantime while i was active in that zone and continuously touching on the park outline it caused a conflict alert during saving. Not good. Don't understand any mapper jumping in, It would have been much more appreciated if you just had dropped me a note on my change set, no conflicts, no irritations.

As an OT, here's your Neis stats page: https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?user_5359 ... An interesting read.

cheers.

107750159

Hi,

You mapped many power windmills where I live some 5 months ago. Many have the description 'dismantled' but to OSM and Osmose that's meaningless. If physically removed they need to be deleted or tagged in such a way they cause no errors. Some spots have 2 WMs. Unlikely. Anyway, if they are dismantled but to stay than the tag disused or abandoned=yes needs adding. Right now the system demands power=generator be added on some 50 of those. Does not look good.

cheers

114284569

Hi,

The whole mapping world had your changeset delivered in the local CS history view, and the mapping world gets dozens delivered in that view of zero interest to the local mapper. No telling though as the comment just says it coastline fixing. I looked at Nun-Rock, it's now in a 1 member MULTIpolygon. That's incorrect AFAIK.

cheers.

114288179

Hi,

I added the Italian wiki link, after-all we're in Italy, or are we? The english wiki has no link through to the Italian which is why the addition. wikipedia:it is a legal code, at least some 80 uses per taginfo. Lest you have a solution, I'll change the main link to the Italian if you don't mind.

ciao

112377478

Hi

I'm surprised the Anello di Valle Giumentina does not include a side step to the historic site and eco museum. Both are within a stones throw distance. (so happen to just have mapped the areas, doing this whole Majella area momentarily)

Now if you know this area from walking, are all these heaps of rock in the landscape man made? From space it does not look natural.

ciao

114234689

No, it was a format i picked up from elsewhere, could have been a wiki. Detail i dont remember, only used few times.

There are many routes that have a / as suffix. 4/ and 4 both pass the nearest crossing to me. They do run not exactly same routes. Public transport users will know when to lift the hand as most stops here are hail and ride.

Routes by default must refer to route master. The route master lists the routes its master off. 😁

To me there's lots of duplication in the system. Those Must matching tags in both relations e.g. If in route master why repeat on the route too🤫

Thanks for your reply.

114234689

Hi,

If you change the route master ref, then the route ref needs to be updated too, so says Osmose. Je pense donc je suis" ;?
Anyway, colour/operator/ref now match on both parts.

Cheers

PS It was no typo, it was by an example, but it did look odd at the time, Whilst the army of 'latest new keys' fixers never stepped in.

112314393

Hi,

what you did is interesting. If you open up your change set in Id Editor and touch one of your "untagged for renderer" greens a wizard pops up, same for fairways adding the landuse=grass tag back in.

Did a complete 18 holes golf course in great detail and never have done any different than adding the landuse=grass tag and that was before ID Editor went nuts on wizards you cant escape and for greens and fairways the type of mowing of course such as grass=finely_mown on greens.. Never a complaint.

ciao.

FYI

114224691

Hi,
that none existing road pointed at eastward to a white line with just a name on it, same as the residential area. where I see in Carto standard that same name being rendered on the map i.e. what's the purpose?That would be flagged is Osmose as a tagless line.

cheers