Ah, yes, the Osmose slap
"Double inner polygon
relation/11787853 analyser josm iD edit".

Kindly reverse your edit. You're the 5th or sixth sticking the foot in, now Osmose reports 'double polygon'. It was fine until your intervention.
(And as with Osmose, not everything JOSM says is, isn't).

TIA

hi,

If you add the general access=yes to footways you are tagging to give general access to all and everything, horses incl. A footway is assumed to be accessible for foot traffic ;o) (The same problem applies to steps and the warning arises of 'overly permissive' if you do.

ciao

GM,

Just some background, the location=surface comes from StreetComplete asking 'is building entirely underground?", to which the answer is No (moi did that). SC is far from complete, it should have removed the layer=-1 tag. This initiates a grey pin alert in Osmose of which I've fixed probably many hundreds, building gaps, intersections, duplicate nodes. What SC did is creating stalemate and the resultant 'flat' rendering depending on the renderer's software.
Origin: Most very probably there was an alert at creation of the building and the question being asked "is this higher or lower" during the saving phase, buildings or highways. Ignore would have too create a grey pin on the map but one gets tallied for ignores ;o)
Only because you checked the 3D rendering did this problem come to surface.

cheers

Hi, the layer=-1 has to go. Check if a path is crossing the building. Historically it is likely that happened.

Ciao, from Passo San leonardo

Hi pippo

Please take note of this change set.

changeset/105092470

When adding parkings one has to either map a route or tag parking=street_side. This makes the amenity accessible for routing.

Of course we use this 'escape' tag judiciously...only use when really street side.

cheers

Just me hinting at mapping a best guess construction=building area. Periodically StreetComplete will pop up a query, 'Is this building complete?' From Raffaelle it shows another concrete monster.
'ciao ciao, ciao ciao ciao ciao'

hi there

The amazing world of online imagery... your former pitch was a building construction site as at nov-2020. This prefab could be ready by now. There's also a tennis pitch west part of the school grounds. Maybe that fell victim too.

ciao ciao.

Hi,

Please note: The street lighting in large if not all parts of Pescara are AUTOMATIC (predominantly LED type) and driven by how bright daylight is i.e. on dark clouded days they can come on hours earlier and stay on later in the morning. Summation: Your lit=sunset-sunrise is dubious.

ciao

Hey Gianni. What's the source of your cycle track mappings? Please add origin i.e. source=survey, trace whatever, and be careful, don't connect to powerlines. ;o).

High, there's this cable you seem to be knowledgeable about. A mapper connected it to a cycle track, so I disconnected and removed the none power node from the line after which the focus jump to a 80 degree turn in the line and noticed there's no tower tag. Is this line which leads into the sea underground? Please confirm. Since it's towerless at all turns I've attached layer= -1 i.e. moved it underground.
Let me know

Hi

your change set create warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 2
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 7

Already I repaired half a dozen, mainly this is because you connected cycle path with power lines.
Kindly make sure if you draw lines, to only connect them to the correct way... highway, highway, building, building etc etc.
TIA

At only 2 uses Spock would say that entrance=free is illogical.
Btw entrance=building may be tagged as building:entrances= has nearly 6000 uses... Some do want to know how many would work as exits too in case of fire, something a collegae does religiously having once been caught in a highrise fire while on the 20th floor. Now i do too. Anyway, fee has 222 pages of 23 answers to the equal. OSM has great tolerance for what is deemed right.

Buona serrata

Hi,

Pretty please, Osmose does not understand Italian when processing tags. Gas Cabinet? The key 'power' is reserved for electricity related fixtures, so I changed it to man_made=street_cabinet + utility=gas

ciao

Hi, you've got a lot of fixing to do.... 882x entrance=building, BUT, it is not wrong... it says " Please consider to use the proposed tagging like entrance=yes or entrance=home.". As the originator of entrance=building on this object I don't.
ciao

My brain just explodes how an edit set has a change NW of Scotland and an island in Greece. Beyond comprehension.

Thanks for researching the underlying cause. Good to know there is such a setting.

The roundabout development on the east side of the Pendolo project is advancing well. The road itself... not so much.

Ah, that graphic representation on turn restriction aid... I've never ventured there to use, I only do the restrictions and enforcements manually. Went to streetview imagery 11-2020 to confirm and no sign whatsoever to forbid u-turns, so I think they should positively go... we're not in the seat of the driver if OK or not. I've added traffic_signals:direction to the traffic light (Osmose will complain to the last one who touched traffic signals if not present), and added the 'controlled' tag to the marked crossings and button_operated=yes to all 3. Bardet has a stop sign, not lit.
TTYL

Hi Finix

I'm trying to understand this 'no-u-turn' school which I had not seen you use before. There's no sign, the sign has been pretty much abolished, at most you'll see a straight on, a left/right etc i.e. what's allowed, which is what I put turn relations in for. For sure, in a discussion with who knows, it was pointed out that these rules are mostly thoroughly redundant. The navigator knows to include to not turn into a 1 way in opposite direction, You can even tell it to not plan with u-turns. Can't remember the last time being told to make a u-turn in the car, my cycle program does at times when I missed a junction...try stop me. The driver/rider remains responsible
cheers