Hi, is that building 1170 meters high, as that is the value you entered, taller than the Burj Khalifa of 828. Maybe you read it somewhere in mm and. meant.11.70 m with decimal point? Also while correcting could you add building:levels which I guess with 12 meter is 2 or 3, class rooms usually higher than regular 3 meters.

Ciao

Correction, it's really a false positive Geofabrik/OSMI issue.

This route makes no sense to me. As large sections are routed as were it a roundtrip route, yet there's sections making use of larger oneway roads WITHOUT a return way. such as at the west end Caserta bus station. Also bus stops are related both sides of the road and one stop is not at the route.

Hi, you changed the forest cutlines, I. e. the way represenring the space m
made in the forsst
thru which the power lines are constructed into the power lines. No, those have to be mapped separately with nodes where the real power towers/poles are, which is often very difficult to see in aerials. I'll be reverting your change. Then you can map the wires separately.

Ciao

3 weeks later corrected most incl wrong oneway direction on rb flare.

Includes rational of merging adjacent forests which were split at inner areas.

Oh yes, rail corridors through woods and other landcover

OK. that restored the forest render. Not sure if the mapper wanter the Park M ont Pistu inner or not as now it has a forest trees overlay

Hi,

Could you please revisit the relation of this building as member of the island outline, If at all it has to have the 'inner' role, but it being a building I think it should not be part of the Relation: Korčula (6114785) relation.

ciao

Va bene, grazie. Ho trovato solo un'immagine su Wikipedia della SS656 dir, ma questa source non è adeguata. Credo che quando si trova in autostrada debba essere indicato il riferimento, ref=A25, in questa sezione poiché ora non ha nome, né riferimento, ma indica solo che fa parte delle strade europee E 80.

Ciao

Ciao,

Qual è stata la motivazione per cui hai rimosso il nome e la designazione di riferimento SS656 in questo insieme di modifiche e l'hai cambiato in un collegamento autostradale senza nome con solo un riferimento E80 non italiano? Documento di origine per favore.

Grazie.

Hi,

Was corrected, a node drag somehow during the edit session but knew there were several rows in that street to prevent parking near the church. Unfortunately editors don't warn for this when it's new item.

On your trip around the country changing arabic and roman numerals to words: You have to preserve the original names as appear on the signs in alt_name. Now the 'signed' names are no longer searchable! Who in the world is looking for Vico quarantatreesimo... Only (some) OSM mappers. Total overshoot.

And there I thought that 'proposed' in mapping was frowned upon and following the news, I'd say most very iffy. OTOH, since it's 'proposed' can't see how this would affect any aerial routing planning as seems to be argued. There's physically nothing there to avoid.

Hi,

Please note, again, ANNCSU is STILL an illegal source PLUS. There's a corner sign that says Via per Popoli which is used also by addresses along that road. Will be reverted!

ciao

Ciao Simone,
I nome del strads tra I fonte e sul segna...
https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/16/16tozw31jxb2sdwpmoy0z622v5id5pcjl-p637526392-full/1991fc3b5ae?width=3072&height=2304&crop=false&q=70

Buona Mappatura

Ciao, felice di vedere un nuovo mappatore nell'area di Chieti/Pescara. Ho dovuto annullare alcune modifiche che hai fatto, ma soprattutto è necessario prestare attenzione ai nomi delle strade che inserisci negli indirizzi. Devono corrispondere al nome di una strada nel vicinato immediato. In questo caso, hai inserito alcune con addr:street=Lenzetta node/13146083182 ma non c'è nessuna strada con quel nome nella zona. Frontalmente è chiamato Fosso dei Lupi, che hai sostituito con Via San Pietro. C'è un'altra strada con Fosso dei Lupi e ricordo di aver visto quel segnale all'angolo più vicino a Filetto, ma non ho trovato segnali per quella che era Via San Pietro.

Comunque, non indichi la fonte se non riferendoti all'immagine aerea di Bing. Spero che tu non abbia utilizzato il sito web ANNCSU poiché la loro licenza CC-BY 4.0 è incompatibile con l'ODBL di OSM. Non possiamo utilizzare le loro informazioni né quelle di Poste Italiane o Google, per citare alcuni esempi.

Hi

Could you please check this version 1 way which has no tags and correct or remove.

way/1423811576#map=19/42.449322/13.881823

thanks

Hi,

Bad news: ANNCSU has an incompatible license with OSM called CC-BY 4.0, so you will have to revert the name changes you applied using this resource as base. Same goes for the addresses, to note that the positioning of the addresses is off such as is very visible in Bolignano and Mutignano.

Sorry, but the rule 'ground truth' and 'on the ground' continues to apply for OSM, meaning that if a wall sign in Pescara which says the street is named Via Giuseppe Maltese 6, that's the one we enter as name in OSM and there are more I found u used ANNCSU to base street name changes on. All needs reverting.

Cheers.

Quote "L’ANNCSU ha licenza CC-BY 4.0, non compatibile per l’import su OSM a meno che non ci sia un waiver e per quanto ne so io non mi risulta che ci sia nessun waiver. Motivo in più per fare revert di eventuali dati su OSM importati da ANNCSU (tantopiù se sovrascrivendo i nomi reali rilevati sul campo)."

It also was discussed multiple times on the telegram group such as here https://t.me/c/1124175268/114638

Hi and welcome to OSM,

You say in your changeset that your source is Bing aerial imagery and nothing else, yet you map buildings that are only visible in Google - WHICH IS ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN. Were there other sources such as on-the-ground surveying?
The shape is poor of the Torre Zembra. It looks perfectly square for which there is an ID Editor function in the right click menu. I've square the building but you still need to clarify the source of these building additions.

Also you say your edit is in/around Villamagna, but you too changed the Corso Mazzine in Vasto from Secondary to Tertiary. By what measure is that change correct? Why this in the same edit?

Please let me know.

Hi,

Not seen the discussion, time to move it to the community category forums, but my general observation is that hardly ever the 'length/width' of a drawn object is *exactly* as what is signed at bridges and tunnels and in many cases significantly off. So I'm a length/width tagger when I see (take picture of sign for documentation) and will add as supplemental source:length=*. In JOSM have a measuring tool so can get close, but not exact.

cheers