Hi,

This is flagged as building on building. changeset/164195644 Cycle by here often. Not seen such a big building arrise here. Think it has to be changed to landuse=military and alligned to the fencing.

Ps Clarity imagery is old. Please use much newer Bing.

Hi,

You mapped a bunch of buildings with names on top of already mapped buildings.

1 These are business names that belong on POI nodes, with type of business, address, contact info etc
2.obviously your duplicate buildings need to be backed out.

Please correct

Ciao

Due indirizzi con civ 127, uno ha addr:street corretto e i secondo con addr:street sbagliato.

node/12669508140
node/12669508139

Saluti
SekeRob

Hi,

Hate to disappoint you about that Straight Only sign you entered as a turn restriction. It's signed absolutely everywhere here in Italy, in the majority of cases only to indicate that there's a forward only at the next sidestreet/T junction. We don't map them since routers know you cant turn into that side street following either to left or right and continue your travels on. Would we map these superfluous restrictions, there'd be tens if not hundreds of thousands to map in Italy based on this sign... they work as a pre-advise as in the next street you can't continue thru, In fact here the rail work traffic can make a left coming from the SE.

As I pass that street about once a week, it's not the correct sign, road managers are not perfect, it should have been IT:II.311, literally "Preavviso di strada senza uscita (Pre-advise, no exit"). It ends at the construction site gate. Construction traffic can make a left coming from the SE.

VV your CS edit set link, seeing you mapping all over Europe and elsewhere in little blips, do you know all the local laws, regulations and practices of all these countries? I don't and therefor abstain from going into traffic routing coding abroad.

happy mapping
cheers

Yes, please go ahead... on your inspirational tour you might get passed L'Aquila... The eagle. ;o)

ciao

Since you were the last to touch these outlines, islands too have multiple, 'assumed' you may not have checked the other relations, Turns out another mapper touched on the same relations and forgot about the larger ones. He fixed it after a general ping on the community forums.

cheers

Hi,

Did you verify those admin relations are whole and complete? Currently and same as a couple of week ago e.g. the main one shows as broken in OSM Inspector and if loaded into OSM, the missing parts show in absence of red line highlighting. Please see

relation/4016746#map=12/45.2530/14.3760

(Possibly this is may have been caused by the same mapper who was doing data imports and broke the Adriatic Sea, in amongst half a dozen other boundaries and coastlines which we noticed in Italy too.

ciao

Hi,

railway=disused/abandoned... hmmm, oh yes, the supplemental disused:railway=rail says it pertains to the rail part. Was recently made aware that lifecycle tags for certain objects/parts are to be placed on a separate tag rather than a prefix... think it was on the community forum so I'll get to that when I'll get to that and checking back had completely forgotten about it, 3 years ago did it right changeset/108043691

Anyway, In fact, razed is closer to the truth for the sections that have gone under the cycleway paving like most, for sure it will never ever be reinstated as a railway.

Got the same between Ortona and Vasto (now that is a really really nice cycleroute on the sea border). Dutch will love it as it often gives a nice stiff breeze either going SE or NW blazing over the Adriatic.. put your factor 50 on. Temp differences between sea and land can really amplify that effect.

These rails mostly better to be placed on the OHM site is my opinion, somewhere external to standard OSM.

A mapper complaint recently running a double flat because he tried to cycle on a remaining 1.5km piece where the rock bed was still there but absolutely everything else removed....you need to swap to the SS16 primary and pray while traversing there, heavy lorries racing by, actually now routing there, but recommend to better push bike that stretch along the old track. Don't know the history why that part is not done up. 3m wide cycleway stops dead and then continues 1.5km further on, 3m wide.

Also Sangritana between Lanciano and Casoli and on is thoroughly abandoned, sections truly gone but still tagged as disused. A mapper went about few months ago restoring the level crossings again as were they operational. Some hardware (lights, liftgates, signals is still there in severe dilapidated state and some crossings have no binaries to see, just asphalt... ah yes reminds me of Ortona - Orsogna... in practical terms gone but a few relics and yet still tagged as disused, As said, the local rail aficionados can put their teeth in on those.

Maybe was:railway tag... there's 4K use on TagInfo (no wiki, lots of tag combos), At any rate, I let mostly the rail aficionados worry about that, the local community that is, long as it does not conflict with the rests of the way routing which it did when I made that change, think around the time when I mapped the 3100km Appennino Bike Tour route in 44+1 stages... The 1 having a part actually traveling by rail to the ferry port going to Messina- Sicily. relation/17814924.
Was a few weeks of work including resolving routing issues. You need some really good legs for sections like Torre to Passo San Leonardo on to Rivisondoli

cheers

Hi.

There's no name conflict here "on the ground", even one of the 7 wall signs had a recent paint refresh to indicate its secondo tratto.
. Ciao

Ciao,

Perché hai eliminato questo nodo di hamlet. node/3924006274/history. Come già notato nel mio altro commento su CS, se elimini oggetti devi spiegare nei tuoi commenti su CS. Ci sono anche i tag del ciclo di vita. Se un edificio esisteva ed è stato demolito, devi contrassegnarlo come demolished:building=yes per indicare ad altri mappatori che non è più lì, così non lo ricreeranno in base a immagini obsolete che potrebbero utilizzare.

Saluti

E perché hai cancellato queste informazioni?
way/1311801945

Ciao

Ti prego di SMETTERE di eliminare oggetti, modificarli e altro senza commentare specificamente nel tuo set di modifiche PERCHÉ stai eliminando oggetti. Se non sai come riparare qualcosa che hai rotto, usa il pulsante di annullamento in alto a destra, ma non salvare oggetti che hai rotto.

(Hi,

Kindly STOP deleting objects, mangling them and more without specifically commenting in your edit set WHY you are deleting object. If you do not know how to fix something you broke use the reverse button right top, but don't save objects you broke.)

Grazie

Ciao,

Alcune correzioni al tuo tagging:
changeset/162776672

Don't know why that papyrus info was deleted and turned into a single plant with 1 tag... you may want to check with the deleter as to why. changeset/162507642

errata: The video is attached to this object way/1311955083#map=18/42.316141/13.310682

Hi,

Apologies. The longer viaduct in the motorway section, Fornaca west, was blown up in 2022 for a new one, seismic proof, video in my edit. Nobody bothered to adapt the road routing and accesses till now, so I did. By the looks it will be still a while, the Fornaca east now oneway=no . It's not an extremely busy motorway so the usual, taking their time. Forgot about FB routes.

Mea Maxima Culpa
cheers

Hi,

Is there now somewhere a place holder node to carry all these area tags... my overpass can't seems to find any, and Adriatic I've never heard of being a contentious name.

chrs

Since I still had the data set from last week, just refreshed that coastline section, then seeing there were border imports along that coastline breaking at least 5 area relation, done by the CS prior to Filo's doing by this account @Import%20DGU%20borders, few hundred edit, guaranteed success. This is 1 mapper scale above me.

Hi,

Actually think that Filo edit should have been reverted as the Adriatic coastline boundary is broken in the Volosko corner in multiple sections, since highlighted in OSM Inspector. Not a week ago I spent hours loading the Adriatic relations to correct it, most time wasted on loading the whole A relation into JOSM memory to verify all was properly closed. Oh will, version 1011 now, mopping with the watertap open.

ciao