Anyone seeing this, this Forest relation is a mess, a mess at 2300 members with inconsistent polygon mapping techniques used. Needs urgent splitting.

hi,

All your change sets always just say you're adding buildings so I look sometimes since you do everything under that CS comment label and saw you added wikidata/pedia tags of the route relation to Corso Umberto Primo in Montesilvano Just not a good idea since that route is over 2200 members meaning you'd be repeating same same for every road section in that route. Hope you had no plans doing that. Please let's abolish that idea and only tag the minimal which is the ref=SS16 here which kicks in as map name if no name=* has been entered,

Cheers

Oh, and the second Via Marche mapped in 2013 is Via Puglia :O)

Hi,

For good order, the roles for the ski area segments has to be 'outer', not 'inner' . Notably you tagged both the subareas and the MP relation with the same tags. Within a multipolygon the feature tags only go on the multipolygon relation. Best is you move the names to single nodes centered within the individual areas. That might facilitate the for the names to show on the map.

ciao

1 year later .... possible some silly reflex to an Osmose moan. There's lots of infissi here who construct windows (and doors) su misura. I'm fine with windows put back to what I put there originally.

Hi,

Look like another poorly developed/instructed set up of a maproulette chalenge
When you convert parking nodes to parking areas you also have to verify the parking 'area' can be reached by routing either by mapping a way onto the parking from the road or tagging it as parking=street_side when it is directly at the side of the street without separation. I have fixed it, but please tell the one who set up this project.

ciao

Ciao,

Per il vostro piacere di lettura e per l'applicazione ai vostri change sets in futuri. osm.wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Nessun commento è inutile.

Grazie

Hi,

Corrected the construction tagging, which are always for ways
construction=what's constructed, here cycleway
highway=construction telling routers it can't be used yet

Question I have on the tunnels is, are these old railway tunnels completely forgotten or newly drilled ones? Saw there was some work on the Ortona end of the seaside cycleway but never noticed anything on the Lido Riccio side.

Is there some target date for completion of this project?

Thanks & ciao

When visiting the gate was thoroughly locked and construction sign was up, hence entrance by permit (for the construction workers). It's a bit odd this is part of the cycle route when no route is leading to it.

The natural=riverbed tag used is seemingly a deprecated one. See osm.wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Driverbed for new tagging recommendation

Gran Sasso/Imperatore lanuse/cover, reclass fell to needle forest (planted) w/ landslide zones.

Ciao Marco

Si prega di leggere il wiki degli indirizzi specifico per l'Italia. I numeri civici/indirizzi si trovano nel punto in cui si trova l'ingresso in un nodo separato.

osm.wiki/IT:Addresses

ciao

Hi,

your 'y' edit, a meaningless comment, has been cancelled as it caused too many problems, building and highway dragging inclusive.

ciao

Hi,

made is set of corrections with changeset/141672956 as your forest had disappeared from view,

ciao

ID Editor is actually very good at breaking multipolygon relations and not telling it is as it does not download the whole of the relations worked on.

I'd recommend you try out JOSM combined with the RelToolbox (Relation Validation plugin). It allows easy downloading of complete relations and will give a detail validation error/warning list of items needing fixing prior to saving. Quite a few roles were missing here as were many sections of inner area not made member. Also whole multipolygons were made inner to the forest. Can't do that, the outlines of the MP/SP needs selecting and made inner. If an MP is not properly closed or self intersecting it will tell you and where in the Validator pane.

cheers

Hi,

Fixed some of your WIP
relation/16329595

Think the forest needs splitting along the major roads.

ciao

Right, from aerial there's no way this is a foot/bike only 'path' with those street_side parkings not to speak of the bus stops.

See https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1170&zoom=9&lat=46.105&lon=11.921&level=3&tags=&fixable=&issue_uuid=184a2777-8622-b4d2-19ba-3f240b2f64cd for the countless double polygons needing cleaning

See your name on an edit in Ukraine... The link below confirms the name:it
https://www.merano-suedtirol.it/en/partschins-rabland-und-toell/mountain-holidays/hiking-mountain-tours/hiking-trails/difficult-difficult-high-alpine-hiking-tours/121227231-peak-roteck-monte-rosso-3-336-m.html#:~:text=The%20Roteck%2FMonte%20Rosso%20peak,best%20divided%20into%20two%20days.

Don't know why the 'highest point' value on that page is noting 3333 when it's article headed as 3337. The rock pile on top :? Never understood the proximity thing too some insisting as tagging on peaks.

You have me blessing to put the reverted values back

Cheers

Hi,

Please be aware of this revert made by a now deleted account.

changeset/140693054