Hi,

you and your fellow mapbox bing mappers have made a mess here, so I've reverted 136420339 and your fellow's 136410803 to restore the new parking and ways area.

ciao

Ciao, Antonio

La pista ciclabile che hai mappato su Piazza Domenico Scaramella è a sud del lato o nord della strada ed è una via separata o segregata con una linea dipinta? In questo momento la mappatura è sbagliata perché la metti in cima alla strada esistente invece che di lato, cioè deve essere rimossa da quella posizione. Se mi colleghi a una foto, sarò in grado di dire qual è la mappatura e l'etichettatura corrette.

A dopo

You were a minute quicker than me fixing on this... my upload failed as JOSM reported a newer version on server.

Have good day.

PS This forest of 798 members is candidate for splitting. *Recommended* maximum members in a single relation is 300 to keep things well maintainable.

Hi,

You must have been reading the Streets GL discussion?

When I don't forget, which I did here, but now part of my building custom preset in JOSM, I actually add the source:tag=estimated tag which then catches all values which have (best) estimated origin.

From which roof:est_height sprung I don't know but Taginfo notes 13 uses.

cheers.

PS, un nome ritrovato è Borgo Napoli

https://www.tutticap.com/i-21-borgo-napoli-picciano-picciano-pescara-abruzzo-65010/

Ciao

I questo Pz in Picciano way/1117404050 ha un nome?

Grz

Hi,

Guess you and readyboy are one and the same?
All corrections I've made are based on QA program flagged issues. I.e. An entrance tag can't be on an address unless the entrance is affixed to a building or indoor mapped wall.
ciao

Hi

See you enjoy visiting the Abruzzi. You're leaving though a long trail of incorrect object taggings and roles, so please, verify the tagging is correct and current, not from a 10 year old book or something

Enjoy your stay.

Sorry for the big BB. Can't see ATM why the bound box is so big for this CS, nothing has a high version reference but 2 local country roads. Not seeing long powerline on park outline having been touched. Will see tomorrow when overpass updates.

Thoroughly times out on my computer... unviewable. This is in browser with the standard Carto map. Tried in JOSM asking for all member as it initially shows as loaded 'incomplete'. Same, times out. Yes you can add members piece by piece and now it's a major pain to anyone who ever is going to try to change an element anywhere along the line.

Corridor: A railway corridor is the area reserved by the railway companies upon which the rail, stations, emplacements etc are positioned. I've mapped a view miles but only as filler in urban areas.

OK, I've reverted your construction value and added obstacle=vegetation (used in Italy). Since the track is grade5 only agricultural, foot and off-road bicycles might have used it in past.

ciao

Hi,

how did you arrive at highway=construction tag for this scrub covered way?

ciao

Hi,

For your interest as short discussion on the disappearing island in the Carto standard view

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/little-island-new-york-does-not-look-right/98871/4

ciao

Hi,

You have to map the cycleway to the side of the road east or west side) NOT on top and make sure to connect at every side street it crosses.

ciao

Sorry, I don't think like that... everything in a park is part of the park including picnic areas, playgrounds, ponds etc regardless of how relations and roles are mapped. What you now have is just that the outlines of the artworks in the park can not be seen on the map, in fact I see only 1 art icon.

I seem to remember that OSM Inspector somewhere near flags a whole bunch of art pieces with incorrect roles but I did not bother with them so I guess these will show up again as with incorrect relations.

ciao

Hi,

Please note the warnings listed with this change set. I've corrected several not included but please check where ways are crossing buildings, buildings crossing buildings and crossing roads not connected and correct those issues.

happy mapping

OK, pochi aggiustamenti.

changeset/135463792

Si noti che Bing ha un offset sostanziale rispetto a ESRI come viene avvertito per tin l'editor JOSM. Ciò si traduce in un posizionamento incoerente degli edifici, in particolare quando diversi mappatori lavorano nello stesso con immagini diverse.

ciao

"risolto gran problema in piazza" causa ora grande problemi in piazza...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.26606&lat=42.43374&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Could it be trungbin2009 the node data was integrated into the area. I see lots off tags on there
relation/1903516/history