Hi,

Your monster forest (2387 members) disappeared from view. I see you closed the gap late last night which is good, the question though being: You've been working on this since 2015 at least. Why not split this relation in manageable and maintainable parcel? Just getting this to download and render and validate takes ages! I just tried is JOSM, 5 minutes and 63 members less near Terlago, the split somewhat down where not yet mapped cutlines are (function?) . Did not upload, just saved it as a local session, ready to go, if you're OK with that.

cheers

Actually I did not, so the history shows, but have removed the stray tags and moving on.

ciao

Good to see the tree actually did exist ;O)

See no need. If there's a key/tagging issue OSM Inspector or Osmose will sent me an alert. Not going to check on ground if a tree of genus X actually exists. But to make it simple, I you verified it ain't there, chop it down.

--//--

Actually I did not move anything, I just removed the illegal \ character.

Hi,

You ask me 2 years after the fact? I corrected a key tag typo in the level0 editor, one does not see any imagery

ciao

Hi crumou

Seen you do this couple of times: When 1 area like here a scrub zone, shares the outline of a larger area, it has to be mapped as outside without any inner/outer role to in this case the wood. In this case I've split the scrub and wood and made each a simple polygon. See changeset/134331066 for the change

If you need clarification, feel free to ask or revisit the multipolygon wiki which details what's outer and inner, special attention for multiple inside areas that form a single inner zone requiring a separate 'inner' outlines which enclose these.

ciao

Hi,

Yes, the issue was though that these POI were flagged as having to be standalone. Maybe map them with virtual paths to these indoor room walls.

PS, only came here to fix some way conflicts when JOSM editor flagged these. Why information windows have to be mapped separate but wall mounted defibrillator, atm are fine on building/room walls but as we call them 'sportello' somehow are not.

For your "Objets trouvés" there's a tag office=lost_property and amenity=lost_property_office. Both have a OSM wiki page. Maybe add these and remove the tourism tag will stop the alert.

ciao

3D Render with proper oultine relation per F4 Demo
https://demo.map.f4-group.com/#lat=40.7623413&lon=29.9090840&zoom=20&camera.phi=147.308&goto_f4map=goto_f4map

And we have a winner, no more rendering of wetland through rivers and canals, in this worked over zone.

Think we(me) got most all done on this segment, several confused and blank areas outside like something called Ilha de Matadouce just represented by a simple node.

Hi Vera_D

Moi encore. Whenever roads cross buildings, carefully assess what and why to include he question "Is this a tunnel=building_passage? Here the layer=1 tag on the punto pedaggio roof was missing so the layer=-1 (standard tag on roofs these days) putting the motorway link underground at -1 was incorrect. Duly corrected. changeset/134175277

ciao

Hi,

any plans to complete '#operationgreen ' as right now several wood/forest areas have disappeared from view.

Cheers.

PS The object needing correction is way/1156940726

Hi,

You tagged this as highway=track and the invalid hiughway=unclassified. Please choose which it is, track or unclassified and move that value to the highway= key, then delete hiughway.

cheers.

Hi,

Apart from Bing having an image offset problem, you broke Bus z121 route at this roundabout. Please be careful to check that all relations remain intact where cutting and moving roundabout parts around in particular.

Thanks

Hi,

Here's a present OSM Inspector areas view of the edits you did here around the river area. All the light/dark blue, orange, green is incorrectly oulined, same multipolygon relation passing a area line twice or has been assigned the wrong inner or outer role.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.31500&lat=48.59486&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.65&overlays=duplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I suggest you carefully reread the multipolygon wiki pages. If you need help or have questions on specific problem point let me know.

ciao

Hi,

Do you correct Bing for it's image offset?

It was aligned to ESRI which does not suffer this problem. Now it looks off by several meters.

lit tag added to cycleway section. Yield spot at start of street.

It is.

thanks for your quick response action.

buona mappatura.