For the record, OSM allows multiple accounts as long as this freedom is not used for the purpose of abuse. See https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/23027/multiple-accounts-allowed

I have called this out only because the account was created before an agreement was reached regarding the vandalism, and so there was abuse potential.

If you'd like to create an account and start with a clean slate moving forward, it's entirely your right.

Thank you very much. If there are already some bits visible on the ground, you can still mark them as points.

Is it possible that you've missed some streets or some segments?

You marked the southern side of רוטשילד as private.

But the Eastern side of the street is not marked private, see way/88825171 for examples.

Also, the other streets in the area such as Kaplan are not marked private.

It's just a bit weird that only one segment is private. I think you missed something but I could be wrong.

Hello! Welcome to OSM.

You marked רחוב רוטשילד as a private road. Is this road inaccessible to the public?

For the record, this user is a sock-puppet account of @Compositor

Relevant discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-inventing-false-names/128962

Thank you :)
Since the notes you added are also suitable for actual map users, I think they're a better fit for "description".

"note" is for other mappers.

"description" is for anyone.

Relevant discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-inventing-false-names/128962/36

כנראה שבקושי רואים את השאריות ולכן מוחקים את האתר. אתה יכול להוסיף תגית note שמסבירה לממפים אחרים מה לחפש ולמה זה קיים. זה יפחית את הסיכוי לאי הבנות. התגית מציגה הערה לממפים אבל לא למשתמשי קצה.

זה לא כל כך ברור מההסבר פה:

historic=archaeological_site

ללא קשר לדיון החם בפורום ולאמיתות המידע, אני תוהה אם אמורים בכלל למפות דברים קבורים לגמרי שמשתמשים רגילים לא רואים בכלל? (לא כל כך בקיא בתיוגים ארכיאולוגים)

שמח לבשר שעכשיו IHM גם מציג פסלים

נשמע שהראל מסכים שצריך להתחשב בפסלים ב-IHM, ניתן לעקוב אחרי הדיון בלינק למעלה

I opened an Issue for Israel Hiking Map:

https://github.com/IsraelHikingMap/VectorMap/issues/166

(1) it does seem pretty far in this case,

But generally, please be aware that aerial photos have a tendency to be misaligned by a few meters very often. So, you should move things only they're significantly off, or only if you verified by other means too, such as GPS.

You can open an issue here: https://github.com/IsraelHikingMap/VectorMap/issues

If you don't have a Github account, you can try contacting Zstadler or HarelM:

Zstadler: osm.org/messages/new/zstadler

HarelM: osm.org/messages/new/Harel%20M

(2) is called "tagging for a renderer" - it is bad practice. You shouldn't tag according to what looks good in some map. Please read here:
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Instead, you can contact the Israel Hiking Map people about presenting sculptures on their map. They're very responsive.

If the name you added is correct, why are you deleting it?

I think you should refrain from edits and cool down, then discuss it at ease with the community.

It's literally a click in my OSM editor. The source I am referring to is the name before you changed it.

Hello, the original name was "אולג שוורץ", you changed it to קפרידנא and the removed it completely. What is the motive here? Was the old name correct? Are both names incorrect?

אחרי בחינה נוספת, גם "צבי השדה" זה שם שאתם הוספתם במקור. האם זה שם מומצא שצריך למחוק?