Hello Tommy,
thank you for adding these trees. In the future, please note that natural=tree is only supposed to be used on individual nodes, not on areas or ways. I fixed this already by replacing a tree area by two nodes for the individual trees.

Thank you and happy mapping!

Hello,
thank you for adding all those trees.

Please note that natural=tree is only supposed to be used on single nodes, not on ways or areas. I fixed this by replacing your tree ways with individual nodes already.

Thank you and happy mapping!

Hallo,
ich wurse bei meiner ursprünglichen Änderung darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass die Bilder veraltet sind und jetzt sehr viel mehr Bäume hier stehen als die 6, die man aktuell sehen kann. Bin persönlich nicht vor Ort und muss deshalb auf die Einschätzung vertrauen, dass Wald es schon am besten trifft.

Okay, 500 Bäume sind deutlich mehr als die 6 vorher, da stimme ich zu.
Ich habe jetzt die (einzelnen) Bäume gelöscht, die Fläche wieder zu Wald geändert und die "alte" Geometrie hergestellt, indem ich in JOSM den von dir geänderten Stand als zweite Ebene darübergelegt und "abgepaust" habe.

Hallo Hollul,
Danke für den Hinweis, der Übergang zwischen Wiese mit Bäumen drauf und Wald ist ja relativ fließend, aber ich ändere gerne wieder die Fläche zurück. Das gesamte Changeset würde ich nicht rückgängig machen, weil hier viele Probleme mit Relationen waren (type=multipolygon auf einem polygon das keine Relation war, außerdem single member relations), die ich auch behoben habe.

Viele Grüße und ebenfalls Grüße aus Berlin!

Hello,
please make sure you don't connect the roads to the roof. Buildings and roads should not share common nodes among each other. I fixed this in changeset/182339978.

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello,
you selected that you wanted your edit to be reviewed. It looks good, one more thing to improve it could be making the angles exactly rectangular. You can do that by hitting the q key when having the shape selected in the editor.

Thanks and happy mapping!

Nevermind, I realized this is a split up changeset because of the 10000 edits limit

Hello,
it seems like you tried to add buildings but only added the building corners? You need to connect the corners with ways and add building=* tags.

Hello hozpak,
unfortunately, I had to revert your changes once again. Please take my advice from my recent changeset comment seriously. A good editor like iD is easy to use and helps you find errors before you upload. There is also a great community forum, a subreddit and a lively discord server where people will happily answer any questions you might have.
Please do not add address data to roads. Roads don't have addresses.
It would also help if you wrote better changeset comments so people could understand what you're trying to do and give you advice. You can read osm.wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications for more info on that.

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello hozpak and welcome to openstreetmap,
Unfortunately, I had to revert your edits. I think you tried to add a business, but instead, you edited the street. You added tags like opening hours, email addresses, phone numbers and takeout, which are usual tags for a restaurant, but not for a street. Please refer to the wiki (or feel free to reach out to me) if you are unsure what tags to use. Please also note that certain tags only have specific kinds of values, for example you can't just write the whole address into the name tag and you can't paste geo coordinates into the wikipedia tag.
If you are interested in making edits in the future, I highly recommend using an editor that has built in quality checks. The ID editor (the one in your browser if you click edit in the top left of the openstreetmap website) is especially beginner friendly. For example, it uses presets for common features like restaurants and auto suggests what information to fill in.

Thank you and happy mapping!
Jonas

Thank you! I think relation/20014828 is still existing?

Hello,
you created two multipolygon relations (20014828 in an other changeset and then 20032060 in this one) that have some issues: They don't contain any features. Relations are meant as a collection of other features and a multipolygon relation needs at least one member that has the role "outer". Arguably, it also needs at least one other member since single member relations are mostly useless. The other problems with these relations is that the wikipedia and wikidata tags have values that don't make sense.

I don't know enough about these protected nature areas to fix this myself, so it would be great if you could do that.

Thanks and happy mapping!
Jonas

Hello,
I stumbled across the named junctions and was wondering what they were. Is it some official kind of naming system? Are the "names" of the junctions signed? Often when names are numbers, the ref=* tag is more appropriate. Thanks!

Hello,
thank you for adding all those parking spaces! For future edits, please note that access=yes is the right tag to use for public places, "public" is not an established value for the access tag. I already fixed it in your edits here.

Thank you and happy mapping!

Hello,
I see that you also added an other siren in the river right next to his one. It was directly in the water so I removed it from the river, but is it actually there or is this a mistake? node/13708368084
Thank you and happy mapping!

Hello,
it seems like there is a problemm with your editor. For example, in Kenwick park, you added a paraking spot, a picknick place, a tourist sign, a viewpoint and more in just one single location. Please note that the correct tag for a public place is access=yes and not access=public, but that feels like a minor issue when compared to the rest of the problems with this recent edit.

Hello,
Thank you for adding all those details!
Please note that the correct tagging for a public feature is access=yes, not access=public. Don't worry, I already fixed it here and in that other place yesterday, just keep that in mind for future edits please.
Thanks and happy mapping!

You're right, I really get into the habit of this. Personally, I don't think 1800 is that bad, but I never hit the number exactly when eyeballing the segments, so if I go like 30 over and it triggers the QA tool, that's annoying. I split up the segments in the forest patch I'm currently working on and try to target around 1500 nodes in the future.

Hello Mchimwa,
Thank you for adding all those details!
Please use fewer name=* tags, they are only for actual names. For example, a restaurant gets tagged amenity=restaurant, not name=restaurant. The name=* tag is supposed to hold the actual name of the restaurant. If you don't know the name, just don't add a name tag, that's fine. Same with house numbers: Please use addr:housenumber=4 instead of name=4.
For more information, see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions.

Thank you and happy mapping!