Hello,
you selected that you wanted your edit to be reviewed. It looks good, one more thing to improve it could be making the angles exactly rectangular. You can do that by hitting the q key when having the shape selected in the editor.

Thanks and happy mapping!

Nevermind, I realized this is a split up changeset because of the 10000 edits limit

Hello,
it seems like you tried to add buildings but only added the building corners? You need to connect the corners with ways and add building=* tags.

Hello hozpak,
unfortunately, I had to revert your changes once again. Please take my advice from my recent changeset comment seriously. A good editor like iD is easy to use and helps you find errors before you upload. There is also a great community forum, a subreddit and a lively discord server where people will happily answer any questions you might have.
Please do not add address data to roads. Roads don't have addresses.
It would also help if you wrote better changeset comments so people could understand what you're trying to do and give you advice. You can read osm.wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications for more info on that.

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello hozpak and welcome to openstreetmap,
Unfortunately, I had to revert your edits. I think you tried to add a business, but instead, you edited the street. You added tags like opening hours, email addresses, phone numbers and takeout, which are usual tags for a restaurant, but not for a street. Please refer to the wiki (or feel free to reach out to me) if you are unsure what tags to use. Please also note that certain tags only have specific kinds of values, for example you can't just write the whole address into the name tag and you can't paste geo coordinates into the wikipedia tag.
If you are interested in making edits in the future, I highly recommend using an editor that has built in quality checks. The ID editor (the one in your browser if you click edit in the top left of the openstreetmap website) is especially beginner friendly. For example, it uses presets for common features like restaurants and auto suggests what information to fill in.

Thank you and happy mapping!
Jonas

Thank you! I think relation/20014828 is still existing?

Hello,
you created two multipolygon relations (20014828 in an other changeset and then 20032060 in this one) that have some issues: They don't contain any features. Relations are meant as a collection of other features and a multipolygon relation needs at least one member that has the role "outer". Arguably, it also needs at least one other member since single member relations are mostly useless. The other problems with these relations is that the wikipedia and wikidata tags have values that don't make sense.

I don't know enough about these protected nature areas to fix this myself, so it would be great if you could do that.

Thanks and happy mapping!
Jonas

Hello,
I stumbled across the named junctions and was wondering what they were. Is it some official kind of naming system? Are the "names" of the junctions signed? Often when names are numbers, the ref=* tag is more appropriate. Thanks!

Hello,
thank you for adding all those parking spaces! For future edits, please note that access=yes is the right tag to use for public places, "public" is not an established value for the access tag. I already fixed it in your edits here.

Thank you and happy mapping!

Hello,
I see that you also added an other siren in the river right next to his one. It was directly in the water so I removed it from the river, but is it actually there or is this a mistake? node/13708368084
Thank you and happy mapping!

Hello,
it seems like there is a problemm with your editor. For example, in Kenwick park, you added a paraking spot, a picknick place, a tourist sign, a viewpoint and more in just one single location. Please note that the correct tag for a public place is access=yes and not access=public, but that feels like a minor issue when compared to the rest of the problems with this recent edit.

Hello,
Thank you for adding all those details!
Please note that the correct tagging for a public feature is access=yes, not access=public. Don't worry, I already fixed it here and in that other place yesterday, just keep that in mind for future edits please.
Thanks and happy mapping!

You're right, I really get into the habit of this. Personally, I don't think 1800 is that bad, but I never hit the number exactly when eyeballing the segments, so if I go like 30 over and it triggers the QA tool, that's annoying. I split up the segments in the forest patch I'm currently working on and try to target around 1500 nodes in the future.

Hello Mchimwa,
Thank you for adding all those details!
Please use fewer name=* tags, they are only for actual names. For example, a restaurant gets tagged amenity=restaurant, not name=restaurant. The name=* tag is supposed to hold the actual name of the restaurant. If you don't know the name, just don't add a name tag, that's fine. Same with house numbers: Please use addr:housenumber=4 instead of name=4.
For more information, see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions.

Thank you and happy mapping!

Hello,
Thank you for adding all those detials! Please note that natural=tree can only be used on the trees themselves, not on the area that the tree is standing on. I have fixed this already, so don't worry.
Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello Wasila,
as you continue to add all those Zoom Room locations, please take some time to read through this feedback:

- Please do NOT use any building=* tags when the place is inside a building that is already mapped, like a mall. building=commercial does not mean that the place is inside a commercial building, but that it's the building itself, in which case two overlapping buildings exist. building=* tags on a dog training facility only makes sense if the whole building is the dog training building, which in most instances is not the case, as they are often in malls or other bigger buildings.
- If you don't know the exact shape of the dog training place inside the building, just add it as a node instead of a polygon shape. As you can tell, most places inside malls are mapped that way. It is okay to also map dog training places as shapes, but if you do, please make them actually the shape of the business.
- Please use dog=designated on the places you map. dog=yes means that dogs are allowed there, dog=designated means that it's a place made for dogs, which is obviously true in the places you map. It is never correct to use dogs.
- Add amenity=animal_training and animal_training=dog to your places. Adding them consistently makes it easy to, for example, find all the dog training facilities in a certain city, which is the whole point of making this map.

Over the last 24h, I had to make countless edits to clear up your mistakes. Missing animal_training=dog tags are not a huge deal, that's more about data quality, but especially the badly drawn building outlines that overlap with actual buildings (point 1) and to a lesser degree, the usage of dogs instead of dog, cause a lot of work for me.

Best
Jonas

Dear Wasila,
thank you for adding all those dog training facilities!
I have a few suggestions on how to map them more accurately:
If you add amenity=animal_training, they appear on the map as animal training centers.
Furthermore, you can use dog=designated (instead of dog=yes) to show that dogs are not only allowed, but it is a facility especially made for dogs. Please also note that the correct tag is dog, not dogs. Using the singular form is a bit un-intuitive, but that's how it got established on OSM and that's what people and services who seach for dog friendly places expect.
Last but not least, please don't add business inside buildings like malls as thier own buildings. The building=yes tag is not required, a better way to show a dog training place inside a mall is by just adding the info to a single node. That's how all the stores, restaurants and other places inside the mall appear as points on the map.
Feel free to reach out if you have any further questions!

Thanks and happy mapping!
Jonas

Hello,
Thank you for adding all the walking routes!
Please note that the correct tag to use is dog, not dogs. See dog=*.
I fixed them already, so don't worry, but please keep this in mind for future additions.

Thank you and happy mapping!

Hallo,
was genau ist bei relation/13774317/history/1 mit men=explaining gemeint? Ist das ein Schreibfehler oder haben tatsächlich Männer irgendwas erklärt?

Vielen Dank!

Hallo,
diese Änderung hat einige Telefonnummern von phone=+49... zu male=+49... geändert. Teilweise wurden bestehende male tags dadurch überschrieben. Ich räume das gerade manuell auf, es sind ja zum Glück nur eine Hand voll Objekte, aber bitte für zukünftige Änderungen beachten.

Danke und frohes Mappen!