Paul Berry's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178145619 | Runcorn: Various associatedStreet relations updated. |
|
| 167323216 | Shop tag removed as advised. |
|
| 167323216 | As far as I can tell it's alternative medicine but I'm not sure exactly how to tag it. |
|
| 163923804 | As a further example, defibrillator boxes often have postcodes to describe their location and some have taken to expand to that to addr:* tags. As with similar objects, and to echo comments above, I think the consensus is if they're not places capable of receiving mail (tip: is it even a building?) then addr:* tags should not be used, but postal_code is acceptable for a common way to geolocate them. I will see if there's a thread in the talk-gb archives about this. I'm sure it's been raised before. |
|
| 172386123 | I see you've mapped the bridge signs. I've also added one in Godmanchester as node #13335666102. |
|
| 139525465 | Hi John, Did you manage to find where the defib box went? Sometimes they move them a short distance to a more convenient place... Regards,
|
|
| 172386123 | Apologies, I missed this. Will attend to it later today. |
|
| 174184356 | No footway/road as suggested by the fixme. |
|
| 157596290 | Good spot. I've also changed Upper Saint Martin's Lane and Saint Martin's Court accordingly. |
|
| 169131584 | Hi Dan, I tagged this as metal, when I jogged through it back in July, because there isn't a tag for "metal substrate with some kind of non-slip dressing applied to it." There are countless footbridges and steps like this so perhaps we should seek guidance as to how to tag, or even propose a new value. If it's literally the *surface* as seen that needs the tag then asphalt is probably the closest match. Regards,
|
|
| 140284015 | Hi Colin, Not sure if you'd noticed that relation #11011269 (Llangwm) was summarily deleted on the 5th version, and if that was correct. Regards,
|
|
| 151645474 | Just because the website isn't reachable doesn't mean the whole object should be deleted. Even if this means the business has stopped trading, the address tags still remain. |
|
| 171871847 | No problem at all. |
|
| 153581430 | Hi, The service road through the main retail park, and parallel with Bourges Boulevard, is indeed Maskew Avenue. I'm assuming the newer side road is actually now Bourges View, which is as you've mapped it. Regards,
|
|
| 167209430 | Changeset comment was meant to say Ashtree Gardens. |
|
| 165091458 | Thanks for picking this up. I've now fixed this on changeset #166645811. |
|
| 165710082 | Salters Way house numbering. |
|
| 158678132 | Hi, Please note we're not allowed to use what3words data in OpenStreetMap, even if they're posted on a sign, so I have removed them. Please read if you would like to know why: osm.wiki/What3words Thanks for your understanding. Regards,
|
|
| 155458502 | Hi, Please note we're not allowed to use what3words data in OpenStreetMap so I have removed them. Please read if you would like to know why: osm.wiki/What3words Thanks for your understanding. Regards,
|
|
| 163263295 | Hi Philip, Just to let you know that UPRN 2007010321 referred to a community centre that was demolished over a decade ago. (It seems UPRNs don't get updated very often!) I have therefore deleted the building, despite your having touched it only a week ago. Details of the demolition: https://planningexplorer.barnsley.gov.uk/Home/ApplicationDetails?planningApplicationNumber=2013%2F1180 Regards,
|