Shouldn't have wasted your time fixing this seo spam😉
If they want to add stuff to OSM, force them to do it right or we'll forever be fixing it for them.

After I go through a given route's stops, I just use https://relatify.monicz.dev to add them and ways into that route relation and the app takes care of putting everything in the correct order :)

According to the official MTA GTFS feed, BM5 line has only 2 routes 😏.
If you watched NYC's changeset feed, you've seen I've been spending a ton of time massaging bus lines into a proper shape... Adding and updating bus stops and routes with proper tags. So far I've been doing just Brooklyn since I'm most familiar with my boro. But I do know that Queens and the Bronx will require a lot of work to get them updated.
I've been using https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/US/NY/US-NY-MTA-Analysis.html and going one route at a time. (Overpass server errers haven't been helping either 😞)

So you claim you have a beauty shop in Salt Lake City and DJ in NYC? That sounds a bit questionable.
Do note that if you continue to add SEO spam to OSM you account will be flagged to Data Working Group, which can result in temporary or permanent ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180642725

So you claim you have a beauty shop in Salt Lake City and DJ in NYC? That sounds a bit questionable.
Do note that if you continue to add SEO spam to OSM you account will be flagged to Data Working Group, which can result in temporary or permanent ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180644678

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit?
If this relation is not up to the specs of PTv2, rather than downgrading its version, it's better to correct it to be up to the spec of the current version.

Having said that, I'm not sure if this relation is needed at all. BM5 line has only 2 routes, and they are already mapped in relation/20411634 and relation/20320063

Hello.
What is the source of this information?

I think it's been brought up before, but the "memorial" name doesn't seem the best choice when such features (and not always streets) are sometimes named after living people and sometimes not even people. Perhaps "dedication" name is a better word.

I'm not questioning your sources.
And I know that prefix tag is in some use, but I'm generally against about mapping features before they physically exist. My concern is that if the tags aren't updated later, we're left with inaccurate, stale data on the map. If the plan is to remember to update it once it's built, it's better to just hold off and map it accurately when it actually exists on the ground.

OSM is a map of the world NOW. Not how it was in the past or undetermined point in the future. We shouldn't be cluttering the map with things that don't exist, and might not ever exist. Once this signal is actually there then by all means map it. But while it's only proposed, and not even planned or approved, it shouldn't be on OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179921700

Thank you.☺️
Better late than never, but late is not that great😉

Hello.
Please note that every single tag that you added in this changeset is invalid.
This whole changeset will be reverted in full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173069999

Hello.
This feature is missing its primary tag.
When adding elements, please pay attention to add all the necessary tags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177119686

Hello.
What is that description tag?
As documented on description=*, this must MUST NOT be used for any kind of promotional or marketing messaging. It must be a neutral tone description of a feature.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177845957

Hello.
Please note, as documented on website=*, urls must include http:// or https://
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177848008

Hello.
Please note, as documented on website=*, urls must include http:// or https://
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177847430

Hello.
Is this actually real "Flock" brand camera or some other brand and you used flock as a generic meaning?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177824107

Hello.
Is this actually real "Flock" brand camera or some other brand and you used flock as a generic meaning?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177824002

if a business is one of many in a building, it’s best to keep its information on a separate node (the point) rather than the building itself. If the business occupies the entire building (like a standalone fast-food place), then it’s fine to move the tags directly to the building polygon without a separate node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177650490

This looks like a node from a massive data import. Probably a leftover from when smaller buildings used to be here. I think it's safe to delete it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177649373