OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
152312316

Hello.
Please do not create new tiger:* tags. Tiger tags are leftovers from road data import over a decade ago. They tags are not used for anything.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152312316

152283033

Hello.
Please note, as documented on phone=*#Usage, phone numbers should be separated either with - or space.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152283033

152060689

Alright, this changeset has been reverted.👍

152060689

Hello.
Your edit contains a number of significant problems and they must be corrected otherwise this edit will be fully reverted.
For no apparent reason you deleted a bunch of tags from a Starbucks in Chicago.
In almost every single entry you provided a malformed phone number. Phone numbers MUST always include a country dialing code (in US it's +1) and numbers must be separated only by - or space. They must not contain ( or ) symbols. It is documented in phone=*#Usage
When you add feature names they should be fully spelled out, not be abbreviated. "RCFL" must be expanded into its full meaning. If you want to add "RCFL" name you can also add short_name= tag, but name= tag must be corrected regardless. You can read more about this on osm.wiki/Abbreviations

In Texas you deleted building=yes tag for no apparent reason.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060689

152060403

Hello.
Please note that when you enter building height, if you don't specify the units, it's assumed to be meters. This building is 110 feet, not 110 meters. That's a huge difference. :)

Additionally, when entering street names, they should be fully spelled out. Don't abbreviate Avenue into "Ave".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060403

151684930

This just stinks of SEO keyword stuffing. 🫤I could that would go into the official_name= tag?
But that seems more like a slogan rather than a name.

152003498

And if you want to update brand-related tags, this would need to be updated https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=tourism&v=hotel&tt=waldorf#waldorfastoria-665f74

152003498

When you modified the name, iD suggested that it needs to be changed back, correct? That is happening because the name you wanted to add does not match what's in the wikidata database. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1123997

152012504

Hello.
When updating old business to a new one, it's much better to update the existing node/point to contain the current information, instead of deleting the old one and creating a new one.
Updating the existing node preserves history of that object, which might be useful to refer to in the future. But if you delete+create, that history gets deleted too.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152012504

152003498

The fields are locked because that feature has wikidata tag attached.
However you can make edits to other tags without deleting wikidata simply by scrolling down and editing them in the "Tags" section.

151684930

Hello.
"A Small Luxury Hotel" does not belong in a POI name tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151684930

152003498

Hello.
Why did you delete valid tags from this building?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152003498

151980423

SEO spam fully reverted. This info is already encoded in branch= tag.

changeset/152061403

151961929

For crosswalk mapping I recommend you try Rapid. It automatically synchronizes tags between ways and nodes. Makes consistent editing much faster.

151969075

Looking at the bing street imagery, i'm not sure this address exist at all. building just to the north is 49-12 and building to the south is 69-37 50 AVE
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969075

151961929

Hello.
You marked these crosswalks as "lines", but they are actually "zebra". crossing:markings=*#Values lists all the documented values and their examples.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151961929

151961300

Hello.
You created "Unmaintained Edge Trail" way. Is that an official name of this path or just a name you came up with?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151961300

151929607

Hello.
What is the source of these edits? The changes you are making do not match any of the available satellite imagery..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151929607

151911102

If it's under construction then it should be tagged as such.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151911102

151910823

If there's construction here, then shouldn't this be tagged as such?
Routers can't read fixme tags and they would send people here...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151910823