Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag intersections of a sidewalk on 151st Ave with parking lot driveways as marked crossings? Satellite imagery doesn't show any markings.

Also, how come you tagged intersection of 88th St and 151st Ave as uncontrolled when you can clearly see diagonal traffic light gantries extending into the middle of the intersection?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149535858

Hello.
Please note that refuge islands on crossings are best tagged as footway=traffic_island rather than =sidewalk.
You can read more about this tag at footway=traffic_island 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149524646

Hello.
Is it necessary to add lanes:hgv:backward=1 if we already have lanes:backward=1?

Also, this segment is tagged as oneway=yes, yet there's both lanes:backward and lanes:forward tags. Seems like a contradiction, don't you think?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149522202

Wow, NYMM(New York Medical Marketing), after all these years you still suck at OSM!
This spam will be fully reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149510486

Southampton Apartments building is already tagged
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149505371

I fixed it up by properly splitting crosswalks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149502960

I'm not sure if this whole thing should be tagged as a crossing island since you can cross it in only 3 places...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149502814

Hello.
Please remember to connect intersecting crosswalks, otherwise that creates incomplete navigation routing map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149497861

Hello.
"Staten Island" part of the name should be encoded as branch= tag value.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149490229

This edit, just like all your previous ones, needs fixing of the phone number and name tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149456811

Hello.
Why did you delete highway=primary tag from Montgomery Road?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149455537

Hello.
At intersections, if you are mapping curbs, please don't connect 2 sidewalks to the same curb, the way you did at curbs 11402316008, 11402316011, 11402316012 and others. Doing that affects pedestrian/wheelchair navigation routing since it crosses through such a curb. Some routers might complain that it crosses a curb and show a warning, when in reality you can easily get between these 2 sidewalks w/o that curb.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149456193

Perhaps Eltingville Blvd should get parking tags too? Or at least parking:right=separate osm.wiki/Street_parking#Separately_mapped_parking_areas_and_spaces
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149455834

Additionally, "Chicago West", "Chicago North", "Atlanta", etc must not be in the name tag but rather in the branch= tag, specifically intended for this kind of information.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149454248

Hello.
As documented in phone=*#Usage phone numbers must contain country dialing code(in US it's +1) and they must be separated either by space or dash "-".

Furthermore, street names must be fully spelled out, not abbreviated. Not "E Roosevelt Road" but "Roosevelt Road" or "East Roosevelt Road", whichever is appropriate.
Both of these problems must be corrected.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149454248

I understand the intention of not allowing bikes or pedestrians, but =customers is rather confusing... customers of what?🤔

Hello.
What do you mean here by motor_vehicle=customers?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149440730

I found my workflow that works for me and I'll continue to review at the rate that I find suitable to me.
There are no other volunteers reviewing things. I see shit that doesn't get fixed for days, weeks, months and even years.

Not having made a single change in the last 2 months, what brings you to this changeset? 🤨

On daily basis I review 100-300 changesets. It's unrealistic to expect to send a private message in addition to a changeset comment on every changeset that needs fixing or clarification. Changeset comments were created with the specific purpose of public communication about that change. Sending private messages defeats that purpose.
Furthermore, I personally use Gmail and have no problems with receiving and seeing any changeset messages I get. None of them ever go to spam or otherwise get filtered. 🤷

This is an incorrect approach. You are essentially mangling the data to suit one specific application's idiosyncrasies. This is considered osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and shouldn't be done. The application itself needs to be fixed to address this deficiency rather than the underlying data.