OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
145130590

The description tag should be used for neutral tone description of an object. description=*
I'm not sure if 1st-person account of what you were told by somebody else is a suitable form for that tag.๐Ÿ˜‰
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145130590

145130227

Hello.
I see you made this edit based purely on Bing imagery. Unfortunately, by now it's getting rather old and sometimes doesn't match what's on the ground. Please confirm with other, newer imagery, such as ESRI to make sure that you don't miss newly constructed crosswalks or other feature changes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145130227

145096881

Hello.
Do you have any supporting evidence of the paths you added? None of the available satellite imagery shows the existence of them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145096881

145020329

Sure, if you know that it should be sand, you can update it. ๐Ÿ‘From satellite it looked rocky.

145092497

I don't remember if I mentioned it to you already or not, but https://jmapb.github.io/nycaabs/ is great for looking up building metadata in NYC. You can search it by address, building BIN number, block/plot, or right-click on that small map on the right. This site was built by jmapb, another NYC mapper.

145092497

alright. I updated it. building outline is probably not too accurate. hopefully once satellite imagery gets updated it can be fixed up. ๐Ÿ‘

145092497

so that apartment building is not really part of the union theological seminary school? it's just on their property, but not part of the school?

145092497

am i correct to under that in the front there's some sort of church/religious building and behind it is an apartment building?

145018283

I'm trying to remember which validator complained about this๐Ÿค” That was the reason why I edited this and similar nearby features..
Maybe if not josm's then osmose or geofabrik's? I honestly don't remember.

145092497

Is the new building already complete or still under construction?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145092497

145090330

Why did you map all those features but then deleted them?๐Ÿซค
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145090330

145080715

Hello.
Please group your edits into smaller geographic regions, such as a neighborhood, or a city at most.
There's no reason for this changeset to include changes in US and Canada.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145080715

145080416

Hello.
Please group your edits into smaller geographic regions, such as a neighborhood, or a city at most.
There's no reason for this changeset to include changes in US, Canada and Brazil.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145080416

145077494

Hello.
Please note that in OSM all tags are always in lower case. Upper case tags are invalid and ignored by all software.

Based on the text of your Note= tag, it sounds like it's more appropriate for the description= tag instead.

Looking at all the available satellite imagery, I'm not seeing anything that looks like a slipway as documented at leisure=slipway
It sounds like it should be canoe=put_in
Also, slipway=canoe doesn't seem to be a tag used by anybody else.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145077494

145058015

Hello.
What are you trying to map here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145058015

145016364

You can use https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016364 to look at this changeset. It actually shows the difference between previous and current tags/geometries.

145020329

Should that be leisure=slipway or canoe=put_in ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145020329

145018283

Hello.
If I'm not mistaken JOSM validator complains about natural=coastline being fully enclosed by water...Or I don't remember the exact message, but it didn't like it...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145018283

145016670

Hello.
dark_store=* doesn't seem to be a standard OSM tag. Instead, I think what you are looking for is shop=outpost
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016670

145016364

Hello.
Instead of converting from amenity=bar into store=vacant, it's more correct to convert it into disused:amenity=bar.
And instead of shop=deli becomes store=vacant, it should be disused:shop=deli.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016364