OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
132678648

There's no need to have such a giant bbox to update just 5 things. Please split up your changeset into smaller geographical areas.

132656363

I'll repeat once again, location description does not belong in the POI name. We have branch= tag for that! This is the last time I'm fixing this. Next time you do it, I'll flag your account to DWG!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132656363

132623887

I see what you are referring to.👍
Perhaps it's better to retag these buildings using building:part= style as documented in building:part=* ?

132642705

Hello.
Please note that you made a mistake here. When dealing with buildings that are constructed as relations, all tags must be on relations themselves. Elements that define outer and inner parts of building should be tagless lines. You can read more about it here osm.wiki/Relation:building
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132642705

132631247

hello.
what do you mean by areas disappearing?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132631247

132623887

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are those missing building parts? They do not appear on the satellite imagery..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132623887

132615238

Why would you edit your own entry to point to NOT WORKING website address?!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132615238

132614547

I can't tell in this specific case if it is needed or not, but in general building relations are not wrong.. they are used with osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132614547

132555791

Hello.
Please note that these features are already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132555791

132542422

Sorry, this is the correct link way/597061696

132542422

Avoid this by making sure that you submit your changes grouped in small geographic areas, such as neighborhoods, cities, counties or states at most.

You fix this by changing a street that you turned into a powerline, back into street way/597061696/history

132553272

Hello.
When mapping sidewalks, please pay attention that they do not cross buildings since that's not accurate to what's on the ground.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132553272

132552758

Hello.
Please note that these features are already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132552758

132551418

Hello.
If you are going to map sidewalks, please draw them to the full length of the block. Do not stop in the middle of the block since that's not accurate to what's on the ground.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132551418

132548909

Hello.
Please note that this feature is already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132548909

132546580

Hello.
Please note that this feature is already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132546580

132545695

Hello.
Please note that this feature is already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132545695

132545649

Hello.
Please note that this feature is already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132545649

132545600

Hello.
Please note that this feature is already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132545600

132545549

Hello.
Please note that this feature is already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132545549