There's no need to delete it since it's there. However, it shouldn't have a name which doesn't exist.

You might be misunderstanding that tag. It is intended to be used with building=construction, highway=construction, landuse=construction or railway=construction to give more specific information about that object.
Based on what I see it's not intended for POIs.

Since this is not its actual name and osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions this doesn't seem like a proper way to tag this feature. At most it could be considered "loc_name", but even then it's just a name that you came up with and not something referred as by others. And that's still a description of the feature and not as much of a name. But just became a feature doesn't have name doesn't mean it can't be mapped, so it's fine for it to be nameless.
You could also consider tagging it as "attraction=maze" + "maze=labyrinth", but these are not officially agreed tags.

I don't read German so I can't tell, but is that an accepted and documented tag or just some terminology they are playing around with?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122689589

Hello.
Is "Richmond County Country Club" actually the name of this pool or is this just where it is located and the pool itself doesn't have a name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122669981

Hello.
What is the source of those cad pdfs?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122652680

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change access tag from "customers" to "unknown"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122687836

There are a number of other prefixes that might be of use to you in the future edits osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

You could use opening_date= tag opening_date=*
But if you don't know the opening date, perhaps don't map it and instead leave OSM note in that location with relevant details.

Hello.
For node/9834318940 "amenity=restaurant" + "building=construction" combination doesn't make sense.
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637416

Hello.
Is "outdoor pattern" the official name of this feature or something you came up with?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637375

You can read more about this tag at disused=* 👍

Hello.
"amenity:disused=true" is not a correct way to tag closed businesses.
In the case of Fusco "amenity=resturant" should be changed to "disused:amenity=resturant".
In the case of Spa Here "shop=beauty" should be changed to "disused:shop=beauty".
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122635881

If you have time and know-how and what needs to be "fixed" is small enough, it's best to fix it yourself on the spot. Otherwise such fixme tag could be hanging there for years.🙂
Or obviously you are welcome to add the missing data at a later point when you have time.
StreetComplete is primarily for "data enrichment", ie adding missing tags to already mapped features...It's not really intended to be a fully-featured editor like Vespucci or iD on desktop.

But in this specific case in my opinion that ramp should be mapped separately and stairs' tag updated to be "separate". You can see somewhat similar situation in an example here ramp=*

Hello.
Why did you delete this tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122595642

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? Satellite imagery doesn't show there's any wheelchair ramps there. Is that not correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122595171

The other name perhaps could be added as alt_name tag or just outright a separate node?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122594167

I don't see any issues with this edit. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122559974

Hello.
Could you please write meaningful changeset comments to better understand what you are trying to do in your edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122531622

Hello.
Rather than outright deleting such a shape, you can use the value of nycdoitt:bin tag to search on https://jmapb.github.io/nycaabs/ to see if it's registered with any NYC building and from there get all the necessary info to properly map it. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122529805