How is it misuse if it lists who's the operator?

Even if this company didn't exist here, the address tags are valid and should've been left intact.

How is deleting every other tag of this hotel relates to correcting "Misuse of description tag"?

Please provide this supporting evidence that it doesn't exist here.

How is deleting accurate payment tags fixes "Misuse of description tag for a business"? 🤨

Hello.
Could you please provide some supporting information regarding these church driveway names?
Are these officially named streets or names you came up with?

Also, please write proper changeset comments. That spam of letters doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.

In my opinion it should be ; so that it's consistent with lists of values in other tags.

Yes, you unglued parts of 801714827. But since you were already touching this polygon, it'd be nice to have it completely corrected. 👍😊

Hello.
Landuse areas should follow their actual perimeter. They should not extend and connect to the nearby street ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158563674

Hello.
Please split your edits based on their geographic locations. In this case there's no reason for edits from around Toms River be submitted with edits from around Hanover. They should be 2 separate edits.

It's not just about streets. It's about getting rid of ambiguity in names anywhere, especially here.. Does "St." means "Street" or "Saint"?...

Hello.
Please note that it's inappropriate to tag the whole building as a business when that business occupies only a part of this building. Such business must be tagged as a separate node.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158516664

Hello.
When dealing with feature names please don't abbreviate them. Instead of "St." it should be fully spelled out "Saint".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158513015

Hello.
Rather than outright deleting POI, it's much better to use lifecycle prefixes. Doing that not only preserves history of that OSM object, but also still allows that address to be searchable and routable..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158506200

It's not =disused:cannabis, it's disused:shop=
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158479696

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are these edits based on?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158444175

Hello.
Rather than using address ranges of "2-26", it's better to explicitly list them. In NYC there are neighborhoods where actual house numbers are formatted as "2-26".
Also I'm not sure that addr:interpolation= tag is valid on a building if it as a proper addr:housenumber tag too.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158397579

Hello.
Considering little island was built on top of pilings, it's technically above the river, which flows under it, I'm not sure cutting it out is the correct way to map this feature.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158310409

Hello.
You should not have renamed 5889475671. "Banana Republic Factory" is a different store from "Banana Republic".

Hello.
Please note that it is inappropriate to make "test" edits in OSM. This is a live map/database which is used by millions of people. Only real edits must be submitted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158264698