Got it, thanks for fixing that.

Hi there! I noticed some of the service=driveway and service=parking_aisle tags modified in this changeset aren't aligned with the standard OSM Wiki definitions. Per community consensus, driveways generally serve individual properties, while parking aisles are usually the internal lanes within a larger lot. I've adjusted some of the ways in question to better fit the standard definitions.

changeset/186837803

Edit: the original comment should say "collector road" instead of "connector road".

Sorry, but that is not true. Please read osm.wiki/Highways#Carriageways

Can you please explain why you reverted my changeset? In my opinion, following the centerline does a much better job at displaying the "slaloming" nature of Cambridge Street created by the chicanes.

I have changed Summit Ave to be entirely highway=tertiary since it is more of a collector road than a local street.

Fisher Hill is not important enough for place=suburb. I have downgraded it to place=neighbourhood.

What is your source for this changeset? Please note that transliteration is generally discouraged in OSM, with the exception of languages that have multiple orthographies.

I have reverted this changeset. According to the Wiki, highway=pedestrian is meant for use on pedestrianized roads, which the reverted ways are not.

changeset/177869646

Edit: specifically removing ways from closed polygons can break relations.

This changeset has been reverted. Please do not remove ways from relations as this makes them unusable.

changeset/173547427

I think you are looking for 'service=driveway' and 'driveway=pipestem'. This is documented in the OSMWiki but does not have an iD preset.

I reverted this changeset because neither of these places fit the criteria for a 'place=village' as described in the Wiki. Is there a source or sources that you are using to reclassify settlements?

changeset/166718640

I reverted this changeset because neither of these places fit the criteria for a 'place=village' as described in the Wiki. Is there a source or sources that you are using to reclassify settlements?

changeset/166718640

I have reverted this changeset because none of these places fit the criteria for 'place=village'. Since these places are all located at major intersections within an urban area, 'place=square' is the correct tag.

changeset/166371651

This is the wrong changeset. Please disregard the above comment.

I have reverted this changeset because none of these places fit the criteria for 'place=village'. Since these places are all located at major intersections within an urban area, 'place=square' is the correct tag.

changeset/166366050

I have reverted this changeset because it is based on outdated imagery. This section of Washington Street has since been repaved and the crosswalk has been repainted further away from the road.

changeset/165819124

I have reverted this changeset in full as it removes the realignment of various roads and sidewalks

changeset/165205373

I agree that motor_vehicle=destination is a better tag here, however "Dangerous Passing" is definitely not a name. It is more a way for the town to discourage through traffic even though it is technically legal, because the alley does not have its own parcel. There are multiple other "Dangerous Passing" signs nearby, for example off of Tappan Street behind Star Market and between Beacon and Garrison. Also, the alley should connect to Corey Road since there is no obstruction on that side.