MaliMrav's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 160367054 | Mislim da si promašio namenu "name" taga: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Dakle ako se radi o nekom posebnom šalteru koji treba označiti na mapi, onda ga treba nazvati odgovarajućim imenom (tipa "Šalter za zakazivanje termina"). Da li je zakazivanje "protivzakonito", "dvostruko" ili "van sistema eUprave", to ne treba da bude navedeno u "name" tagu, a iskreno mislim ni u jednom drugom tagu. Eventualno neka korisna informacija ("Zakazivanje u 19:00 za naredni dan") bi teorijski mogla da stoji u "description" tagu. Ovako kako si uneo deluje da si ljut na MUP i da želiš da ih ocrniš preko OSM-a. |
|
| 160367054 | (Ponavljam svoju molbu koju sam prethodno poslao u privatnoj poruci) Razumem frustraciju i mene su iznervirali mnogo puta, ali protest vandalizovanjem OpenStreetMap-a je “lajanje na pogrešno drvo”. Nanosiš štetu ugledu OSM-a, nasiš štetu svom ličnom ugledu kao mapera, a ponajmanje štete nanosiš onome koji te je iznervirao. Molim te da revertuješ svoje promene. |
|
| 160274377 | Mislim da dosta ljudi gleda kako je nešto već mapirano pa onda radi slično. Čini mi se da je to daleko popularniji pristup nego studiozno čitanje detalja na wiki-ju. Na taj način, ako na mapi ima grešaka, onda se te greške multipliciraju, jer ako ljudi vide da na nekoliko mesta piše "Pekara X" onda misle da tako treba, pa i oni počnu da pišu "Pekara Y". Wiki je jasan po ovom pitanju: "The names should be restricted to the name of the item in question only and should not include additional information not contained in the official name such as categories, types, descriptions, addresses, refs, or notes." Koliko treba lokalne zajednice da odstupaju od globalnih pravila OSM-a? Ja bih rekao da mogu, ali samo ako za to postoji zaista dobar razlog. Pokrenuću temu na forumu. I mene zanima da li ima nekih razloga za pisanje kategorija / tipova, ili je to rađeno po inerciji i da vidimo šta da radimo dalje. |
|
| 160179060 | You were already warned not to put names on junctions, and yet you continue to do so [2]. I will revert your changeset. [1] changeset/160102086
|
|
| 160102086 | Hi, where did you get the junction names from? Are those official names? Zdravo, šta je izvor podataka za imena raskrsnica koje si uneo? Da li su to zvanična imena? |
|
| 159496637 | Please add meaningfull comments to your changesets (osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments). |
|
| 159104395 | Please remove parking places next to Lidl, becase they have a sloppy geometry, and do more harm then good to the map. |
|
| 159098902 | Please add meaningfull comments to your changesets (osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments). |
|
| 159098902 |
"Cemetery" is for sure not a local name for:
Please fix this. |
|
| 159084297 | Please add meaningfull comments to your changesets (osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments). |
|
| 159080620 | Please add meaningfull comments to your changesets (osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments). |
|
| 158925689 | Hi upc92, this changeset looks problematic to me. It seems that you partially added footpaths around 100 graves on Novo Bežanijsko Groblje (cemetary), with very bad geometry. I don't see much value in adding footpaths between every single grave, it will just make the map look convoluted. And only on one small segment of graveyard? There are 10s of thousends of graves on that cemetary, do you have any plans for the others? Please join Serbian OSM community Telegram channel or forum to discuss this issue. |
|
| 158807267 | Hi, just wanted to check, why did you changed house number from "31a" to "31a;31A"? |
|
| 157505446 | There were some prior discussion at the linked post, and on OSM Serbia Telegram group. However, I agree, official announcement was 3 days ago, so I will postpone my automated edits as requested. Thanks for a heads-up. |