hi horst, danke für deine Hilfe. Hast du eine Quelle für diesen Namen? Gibt es vor Ort eine Tafel? Ich konnte online so schnell keinen Hinweis finden. Und gibt es einen Grund, dass der dritte Teich nicht auch dazugehört? Vielen Dank für die Klärung. LG

This path is not abandoned, there is no sign prohibiting access and it is not even in the Kernzone. This area is part of the freely accessible Erlebniszone.

This way is not abandoned. All visible ways in the Sihltal nature reserve that are illegal to access are explicitly marked with no entry signs, this one is not.

NEVER!!!!! Never just delete highways! Most of these have already been marked as abandoned and no access. This is the maximum you should go! You are destroying a lot of work from other people and creating more unnecessary work to find your malicious changes. You never know how the situation on these ways is going to change again in the future.

changeset/162555642

NEVER!!!!! Never just delete highways! Most of these have already been marked as abandoned and no access. This is the maximum you should go! You are destroying a lot of work from other people and creating more unnecessary work to find your malicious changes. You never know how the situation on these ways is going to change again in the future.

changeset/162555642

NEVER!!!!! Never just delete highways! Most of these have already been marked as abandoned and no access. This is the maximum you should go! You are destroying a lot of work from other people and creating more unnecessary work to find your malicious changes. You never know how the situation on these ways is going to change again in the future.

changeset/162555642

NEVER!!!!! Never just delete highways! Most of these have already been marked as abandoned and no access. This is the maximum you should go! You are destroying a lot of work from other people and creating more unnecessary work to find your malicious changes. You never know how the situation on these ways is going to change again in the future.

changeset/162555631

NEVER!!!!! Never just delete highways! Most of these have already been marked as abandoned and no access. This is the maximum you should go! You are destroying a lot of work from other people and creating more unnecessary work to find your malicious changes. You never know how the situation on these ways is going to change again in the future.

changeset/162555631

NEVER!!!!! Never just delete highways! Most of these have already been marked as abandoned and no access. This is the maximum you should go! You are destroying a lot of work from other people and creating more unnecessary work to find your malicious changes. You never know how the situation on these ways is going to change again in the future.

changeset/162555631

Okay, I didn't expect that could even happen. This looks like an issue with Vespucci to me. It shouldn't be possible to merge two incompatible ways and usually that's the case. If they forgot some parts of the check, we should maybe do a bug report.

Yeah, gravel does actually fit all right? The ways, in particular what is called forest street in CH are all well suitable for bicycles and mostly fit in the description "small pieces of gravel". Fine gravel is "used to specify fine loose gravel ... unsuitable for road bicycles" as they would sink in. I only remember one path in CH that would really fit into this. I've been there too numerous times and I saw all pretty solid ways...

btw I think I haven't really changed compacted recently, I would only do that right there in the field but I see surfaces with a thin layer of loose gravel more frequently than completely solid compacted surfaces as shown in the tag examples, all rather close to asphalt.

Hi Lezurex, danke für das Korrigieren. Ich habe in iD keine Möglichkeit gefunden, in einer Relation ein Element auszutauschen oder irgendwo einzufügen. Ebenso wurde beim Hinzufügen eines Elements zu einer Relation nicht nach der Position gefragt. Ich bin daher von einer automatischen Ordnung ausgegangen wie bspw. bei den Tags. LG Makeena

about the warning: for some reason iD thinks that a disused platform has to be an area while an active platform is a line

Wieso willst du die Haltestellen in die beiden Richtungen unbedingt so unterschiedlich dargestellt haben?! In der Realität sehen sie alle ungefähr gleich aus. All die Relationen zu den vervollständigten Haltestellen hinzuzufügen war ein grosser Aufwand und du löschst das einfach kommentarlos?!

Note: the relations have only been edited to get access to the streets they were lying on in the iD editor, they have been reset after editing the streets

Sorry, still had the wrong source in the upload dialog. It's only on site view.

Schon wieder ein Changeset das viel grösser angezeigt wird als es ist...

Merkwürdig dass das Changeset so gross angezeigt wird. Ich habe eigentlich nur im und direkt um den Hönggerberger Wald Änderungen gemacht.

Ich war heute nochmals vor Ort und habe die Angabe verifiziert. An der Kreuzung, wo der von mir eingezeichnete Pfad aus dem Wald runter kommt, steht der folgende Wegweiser:
https://pasteboard.co/Hkv0Bq4g6oGI.jpg
Wenn du willst, kannst du das gerne melden, mir ist die Bürokratie dafür zu umständlich.

Meinst du den Strassennamen? Ich bin jetzt nicht ganz sicher, wie du ihn geändert hast. Ich mache solche Edits grundsätzlich direkt vor Ort anhand der Strassenschilder, somit sollten meine Änderungen korrekt sein. Anhand meiner Erinnerung bin ich mir ziemlich sicher, dass die Strasse unterhalb des Pumptracks Orelliweg heisst. Die neuste Version von Vespucci macht manchmal auch selbständig Edits, aber ich denke, ich habe zu dem Zeitpunkt noch eine frühere Version verwendet.

Und sorry für das grosse Changeset, ich hatte noch eine aufwändigere Bearbeitung in der gegenüberliegenden Ecke offen, die ich nicht unfertig und somit falsch hochladen wollte.