LordGarySugar's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 181470702 | Do you have a source for Llandysul having a 'town charter'? I've never heard of this concept personally. If you're going around changing all these villages to towns, you should provide the source you've used to classify them all as such. |
|
| 180124455 | Ok, that makes sense, it just looked a bit strange. I would suggest tagging them disused:railway=monorail or abandoned:railway=monoral (depending on condition) seeing as they are no longer in service. |
|
| 172725193 | No problem, I was looking for examples of roof:shape=side_half-hipped and found you'd mapped a few. Urbaneye3D will be adding support for this roof type in the next version, but unfortunately F4map doesn't support it yet. (Same for side_hipped) |
|
| 172725193 | Hi, according to roof:direction=*?uselang=en-GB, you should use roof:direction=SE instead of roof:direction=south_east :) |
|
| 181534983 | New Galloway has a population of about 320. What makes it a town? |
|
| 181470702 | Hi, I see you've been changing lots of towns to villages and vice-versa, can I ask what the source for these designations are? Some of these settlements are very small with less than 1,500 population, far less than what would be expected from a town. |
|
| 181299225 | Hi, what does 'Tasa' mean? It's unlikely that there are scenic viewpoints all along this road. Maybe there is a better tag for what you're trying to add here? |
|
| 180847649 | Are you manually reviewing these edits? For example here you changed highway=serfice to highway=unclassified |
|
| 177349733 | I've deleted this as it's clearly fictional |
|
| 180673427 | Hi, thanks for adding this! If you switch to Esri imagery in the iD editor, you'll see that it's much newer, but lower resolution. I've added the roads and building shape I could make out from it. |
|
| 173303351 | Hi, the geoglyph sections were tagged with building:part as they are painted on the roof of the building and can be represented as part of the building. You can see how the building appears in 3D here: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-39.0588860&lon=174.0716730&zoom=21
|
|
| 180788297 | I've just seen in your other comment that you're mapping on mobile - it would be best to find a dedicated mobile editor such as Vespucci. iD is not designed for touchscreen use, so I don't know if it would be possible to follow the advice I've given above. |
|
| 180788297 | Hi, I saw your post on the forums and came to check out the missing buildings in Northampton. It's great to see you making a start on filling in the gaps, but there's a couple of things you need to do quality-wise.
|
|
| 179341208 | Здравствуйте, пожалуйста, не отображайте здания в виде треугольников. Геометрия должна соответствовать зданию, показанному на аэрофотоснимках. Hi, please do not map buildings as triangles. The geometry should match the building shown on aerial imagery. |
|
| 180483402 | Hey, this changeset converted lots of redundant multipolygons into simple ways, I didn't add anything new or change any tags in this changeset. It's a plugin being actively developed by watmildon, so it was a reference to the fact it's not quite perfect yet. One issue is that it doesn't always preserve the history, which is why lots of these ways are version 1. Any cleanup of the mapping here as you suggested is welcome, I didn't notice the riding arenas were tagged wrongly here. I have been meaning to do a review of the mapping here but haven't got round to it yet. Hope that's all ok, thanks! |
|
| 179264809 | It's not correct to add a place=locality node with name "Iranian attack site". Removed. |
|
| 180124455 | Are there really monoral railway tracks here? What did you intend to represent with them? |
|
| 179549516 | Why? Reverted. changeset/180610861 |
|
| 180279996 | Restored in changeset/180481933 |
|
| 180329131 | Hi, just a note to say we can't use Google Street View for mapping, or other copyrighted maps osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps |