For the n-th time: Please don't draw every random desire line. You don't a routing software to walk anywhere you like or take shortcuts.

1. What I said is `=use_sidepath` means legally must walk on sidewalks, and walking on roadways is banned. It doesn't mean "recommend not doing that".
2. What does this mean? They should act according to lack of `=sidewalk` , or presence of `sidewalk=left` vs `sidewalk:left=separate` as with the entire world.

Did you look around? node/1000961987

There's not ever any `=peak` here. Don't automatically use `=peak` for anything named Hill. It may be a part only.

This is a jurisdiction legal default that shouldn't be added. HK doesn't prohibit walking on roadway either.

Please read the tags and comments

1. Those signs in practice don't mean `=no` , but no walking on the roadway only. They are still used when there's sidewalks.
2. `=use_sidepath` means mandatory, not what one recommends. Only `sidewalk=left` / `sidewalk:left=separate` is needed.

1. 15m only means can't cross. May not mean can't walk on roadway.
2. `foot=` in the `junction=intersection` is enough

Correction:
1. `=use_sidepath` is not needed in the mid-block between intersections. It's technically not correct, as walking on roadway isn't totally prohibited for sidewalks to be mandatory.
2. `=no` should be used for side with footbridges and subways only. `=use_sidepath` is used for crosswalk, considering some applications or end users don't extract them.

Correction: `=use_sidepath` is not needed in the approach outside intersection.

`=use_sidepath` is not needed in the approach outside intersection. `=no` should be used for side with footbridges and subways only. `=use_sidepath` is used for crosswalk.

`=use_sidepath` is not needed in the approach outside intersection. `=no` should be used for side with footbridges and subways only. `=use_sidepath` is used for crosswalk, considering some applications or end users don't extract them.

```
A
|******|
|--L1--|
|******|
|--D1--|
|*******|
*******D
```

There's no rule that routing from `=tertiary` must be `=tertiary` at the same class. Taking shortcuts doesn't need to be encouraged. `=unclassified` would be enough.
```
A
| |
|--L1--|
| |
|--D1--|
| |
D
```
It doesn't mean L1 should be `=tertiary`
Andgain merely counting signalized intersection is insufficient.

This is wrong. It's not tendered yet.

Please don't directly delete, as it still represent a store space, and may contain addresses or other info. This makes tracking and updating them more difficult, adding next user's effort, and wasting previous user's work. Change it `was:amenity=` first.

1. It's not a single criteria viewed individually. This connecting different `=unclassified` together, and with `=secondary` at terminals.
2. HK has more elaborate road hierarchy, and closer to functional classification. Other countries have `highway=` based on administration and routes. Urban areas should be compared, not sparse suburbs.
3. I'm guessing eastbound right turn is not considered when classifying years ago, and that doesn't affect between Tai Ho Rd and Wai Tsuen Rd. Tai Ho Rd southbound only has Tsuen Wan Market St, and Sha Tsui Rd or southward better use Tai Chung Rd. I don't see how westbound has any significance?

Tunnel Area uses `motorroad=`

See previous. This is not `=motorway` as it can be accessed by non-Expressway roads.

Functionally it can be compared with Sai Lau Kok Rd. Only that it has low volume from low density, and no buses or malls. But there's nominally industries.