Hi and welcome to OSM! I haven't been down by the high school since the pavilion was built, but the name looks like it might be a description (osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions) rather than the signed name.

Also, it looks like it's just a roof rather than a pavilion by the OSM definition (OSM was started in Britain, so everything is technically supposed to be in British English). Just make sure to check the wiki when you start using a new tag.

Happy mapping!

Hi Troy, welcome to OSM.

You asked for review, so here are a few issues I noticed. First is that you applied the tag healthcare=birthing_centre to this shop. My first guess would've been shop=money_lender, but the website doesn't mention any payday-loan-type services so I don't think it matches. I've left it as simply shop=yes since I couldn't find any tags that felt right.

The next is that you didn't format the phone number correctly. We include the country code (+1 for US/Canada) in the phone number.

Lastly, you made a couple mistakes with the address. You included the housenumber in addr:street and you abbreviated Drive in the street name. We don't do abbreviations in OSM; it's easier to automatically shorten all these than to figure out what the full name is.

I went ahead and fixed these. Happy mapping!

Why'd you add a natural=strait on a small stream in the middle of Oklahoma?

That Marriott/Tribute Portfolio hotel may also need to be redone, probably name=[Property Name] and brand=Tribute Portfolio. The mapping community isn't particularly strong in the US, so things like that often aren't caught.

I brought it up to some other mappers, and they agreed it should just be Horseshoe Lake Charles as that's what it says on the sign (and also the official website and facebook page). The general consensus is to map the ground truth (osm.wiki/Ground_truth), so the signed name gets the primary name tag.

Okay I see. Well the default name tag is meant for the most common name people are likely to use for an object. The current tag is clearly not that; I don't even think it would be the official name because the latter half is just an advertising slogan for their rewards program.

Do you have any objection to reverting to the normal names for these locations?

I don't think "A Caesars Rewards Destination" should be a part of the name tag. Where did you get that from? You did the same for several other Caesars properties and I can't tell why. Is it because that's what they're listed as on Expedia?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185245098

For way/12599614, What do you mean by surface=-? Also from aerial imagery it looks more like a road with ditches on either side rather than a road embankment=yes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184894211

I went ahead and fixed it, but you should know that the opening_hours key has a specific syntax. You can check if you got it right at https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/

You seem to have copied the tags from a house in Georgia to an apartment complex in California.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181420302

You should split these kinds of changesets up in the future. It alerts users monitoring local changes across the wide area between the two, despite none of the changes being in our regions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181281499

Did you discuss this mass-import of ghostbike data ahead of time with anyone? Typical policy is to get community feedback and do it from a separate account. osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi I see you requested review on this. All the changes you made seem reasonable, but I would advise you split such geographically dispersed changesets up. In this case, you corrected roads in Texas, Oregon, and Georgia, which are all quite far apart. This makes them difficult to review and alerts people across the country.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180527998

You should keep edits local when reasonable. This changeset included edits in Dallas and Miami.

Additionally, if you disagree with building=warehouse being used for storage rentals, you might want to bring it up with the community since that's the current advice given on the wiki for shop=storage_rental.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180184343

Hi and welcome to OSM. Is this land used for grazing animals or growing hay? In that case the most appropriate tags would be landuse=meadow with meadow=pasture or meadow=agricultural. I couldn't tell what you use it for from imagery so I didn't specify which kind of meadow it is.

We use landuse=farmland to refer to areas used for growing crops in particular, which doesn't seem to be the case here from aerial imagery.

Hi after a recent discussion on wiki, we decided to change the camera:power=* tagging to the preexisting tagging electricity=*. See man_made=surveillance for the specifics.

Hi after a recent discussion on wiki, we decided to change the camera:power=* tagging to the preexisting tagging electricity=*. See man_made=surveillance for the specifics.

Hi, I see that you requested review on this changeset. The tags you applied look fine, and I see that you already removed the duplicates from the other house.

If you ever have any questions, feel free to reach out to me or at community.openstreetmap.org. Happy mapping and welcome to osm!

The way you typically address covered drive-throughs is to separate the highway, connect the portion covered to the outline of the building, and add the tag covered=yes. You added the tag layer=-1 to a couple examples here, which implies that the road would be going underground or something. See way/1377086886 for an example.

Happy mapping :)

I'll trust your local knowledge if you say so.

You should look up examples on how prevalent is used since you definitely misunderstood the dictionary definition you gave. One wouldn't describe the breadth of one's knowledge as prevalent; instead you'd use it to describe how common things or practices are, eg "Dr. Pepper is a prevalent drink in Texas."

Happy mapping! :)

I'm sorry, but your reply doesn't make sense. What do you mean "This is prevalent for the airfield in Texas"? What do you mean "There is quite a bit of areas"?

To clarify, my issue is that way/1472523569 doesn't line up with the most recent ESRI imagery from January 2025. It should connect at a right angle with the runway, unless the airfield has been resurfaced since then.