Hi Dave, tahnk you for mentioning. I reversed the change. Don't know why it become private. I guess because there where too many window open. Permissive would probably be best choice, but for now i just reversed. Kind regards.

my pleasure, gr Joris

Hi rskedgell, thank you for the chat. I agree that i did not look that close but just changed to what at least is true. But it could be removed as well. Be mee guest :-) Kind regards,
Joris

There are no mistakes, only variations. kind regards, Joris

That's quick :-) gr. Joris

Hi 5121

Thank you for your time explaining! I think the legal access is not very relevant in this case. The map is used for real live usage and routing and if your horse needs to be dismantled 😊 seems to be a one time only access then.
I leave it up to you off course.

Kind regards and thank you for all your effort in our nice project

Joris

Hi, It's selfmade hobby software for mapmaking also indicating odd access rules which could potentially cause routing issues. Sometimes I repair some and test my software again or change my software to ignore the known situations. Kind regards Joris

Hi user_5121
A while ago you added this bridleway of which my algoritms stumble over the odd access tagging. Bicycle and horse = yes but also inaccesible. Maybe you could have a look and change the to yes/no/designated. Kind regards Joris

Hi Rico, i reversed the edit. The situation popupped in a scan as it matched some criteria. Thank you for mentioning. Kind regards, Joris

Hi Gileri, thank you for the feedback. the merge of two barriers was an accident i guess. I only had the intention to add access for barriers which reside on a cycle route and do not have the explicit access for bicycle set to yes. If there are two barriers, it should be reveresed. No idea what ambulances can dismount :-) Sounds nonsense to me. If you know the real situation, please change it. Kind regards Joris

Hallo Tonny, heb eea bijgewerkt, als er iets nog niet helemaal goed mocht zijn voel je vrij om het dan aan te passen. gr Joris

Hallo Tonny, bedankt voor de herinnering, die ben ik idd vergeten. Moest ineens weg en heb op opslaan gedrukt. Stroomrichting moest ook nog worden omgedraaid dacht ik en tunnels toegevoegd en zo. Ik zal er eens naar kijken. gr Joris

Hi Rom1, thx you for the feedback, I will revert them and respect the French community but it's a pity. According to the wiki it's both valid and used by mapmakers to decide at what zoomlevel large cities nicely appear. Retrieving the value from surrouding areas is much more difficult (if not impossible) by the more simpel map-renderers. Kind regards Joris

Hi Stereo, a couple of days ago you added oneway=yes to a small part of route de beaufort (id 363709735) connecting to route de Dillingen. Is this correct? Mapillary shows roadworks, but it seems unlikely this short piece has become oneway. Kind regards, Joris

Hallo Philippec, ik kan niet reconstrueren wat je precies bedoelt met de twee gebouwen die verkeerd zijn, maar pas ze gerust aan als je denkt dat et niet juist is. Groetjes Joris

Hi 5329

I ment private, prefill lookup was not fast enough. I fixed it.
Thanks for the tip,

Kind regards
Joris

Dankjewel voor het repareren
gr Joris

Sorry, ik bedoel Pieter :-)

Hallo Peter, op de beelden lijkt het dat er gewoon fietspad is aan beide zijden. Ik zal er morgen wel eens langsfietsen dan weet ik het zeker.
gr Joris

Dank, gr Joris