Please correct the tagging of the footway. The access=private is sufficient. Besides, this is in a gated milliitary area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179186709

I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish, the steps are already tagged as private so the tag foot=private makes no sense. Please remove.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179186743

Your edit looks good. I'll send you some info on OSM in a message.

I am currious why the tag man_made=pier was removed from the north east most dock? It looks like part of a pier.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179152350

I don't believe there is a feature; just select and drag the nodes to the right location. Nodes can be added, buy double clicking on the way then dragged to match the image. I agree that it requires more work, but it save the history of the object.

This doesn't look like a motorway since it doesn't have limited access. See highway=motorway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179148625

You tagged the way as a track, which implies used by 4WD vehicles. highway=path is what we typically call a trail. Just checking to make sure you got the right type of way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179110817

restored in changeset/179137247#

It looks like you acidentally dragged a node for overhead power lines. It has been fixed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179059953

Please leave a brief changeset comment, besides the hashag explaining what this edit does. for example Added building.

also, you can square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179045488

Mainly because I'm tired of SeO companies dumping trash in OSM that we have to fix. This one was close to just being deleted. Over the years, I've seen so many garbage SEO edits that I'm just tired of them.

Before continuing to add features from the cities open data could you please confirm that the data license is compatible to be imported into OSM? See osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_2:_License_approval

I haven't made many golf course edit, which is ironic since I live next to the 14th hole of a defunct course.
I did run a query which showed 24 edits likely involved. I can provide you a list if needed.

My suggestion is to quickly get your proposal document on the wiki, especially which tag you want to remove or change. Get that to the community and let's see what the consensus is. If there is major push back, then we may have to revert. I can help with that.

In OSM, unsanctioned trails are tagged as informal, informal=yes. Additionally, If the trails have posted signs such as no trespassing they can also be tagged as access=private. I'm going to revert this changeset since it does not comply with our wiki. See highway=path and access=*.

Basically if the path exists it can be added to OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179009659

From your changeset comment, I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is there anything I can do to help?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178958250

From your changeset comment, I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is there anything I can do to help?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178958250

#TIP: Descriptive name like name=Residence are not used. Tags can do the trick. I removed the name tag
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178950256

DWG here - can you show where on the wiki you documented this mass change?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178947319

For future imports, please follow the wiki guidelines at osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178229093

Instead of deleting then adding the buildings back, it is better to just update the existing outline. Doing so will keep the history intact.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177571644

Se pare că în această editare, precum și în altele, clădirile trebuie să fie pătrate. Pentru a pătra clădirea, selectați conturul, apoi tastați pur și simplu „q”. Încercați să potriviți linia acoperișului cu conturul clădirii.

in English:
It appears on this edit as well as other that buildings need to be squared. To square the building, select the outline then just type a "q". Try to match the roof line to the building outlines.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177580060