OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177230821 | Why are you changing footways to paths. The wiki highway=path clearly shows what a path should look like. This is a footway, see highway=footway
|
|
| 177228299 | You were ahead of me. Thanks for updating the tag. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 177208329 | Check out landuse=brownfield or landuse=construction for a more appropriate tag
|
|
| 177206963 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Just a note that Google's license prohibits it use in OSM. Since you modified the rock from imagery, I'm assuming that you use the imagery to identify the road.
|
|
| 177142980 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 177113963 | No, what I'm saying is that SEO edits are notorious for bad quality. I do find it interesting that both businesses show up on a web search at that address. Both have pictures of what appear to be the same building. |
|
| 177123169 | I changed this to landuse=commercial since there is no wooded area. You could add the wooded area. I typically get a large area and tag it natural=wood so I can be areas that are logged and areas that are not designated for logging. Let me know if you need help.
|
|
| 177123060 | Again, we don't use descriptive names. You could add the name to the building where the business is located.
|
|
| 177122925 | Driveways should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. We also don't add descriptive names. Can you correct the tagging and remove the descriptive name?
|
|
| 177117694 | Other mappers may move the water so it matches the imagery better. You could add a note to the polygon with a link to the documentation that shows the correct area.
|
|
| 177118423 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 177113963 | This was likely done by an SEO who probably won't answer. Feel free to remove the node if you don't think it is correct.
|
|
| 177041472 | OSM road classification is based on the definition from England (where OSM got its start). The wiki has no requirement for width, it can even be just one lane. Even though the road is not maintained by the local government, it can still fit the definition of highway=residential. See highway=residential. Also the tag ownership=private can be added. |
|
| 177044694 | Thhe school's website shows the address as 2202 M Avenue. https://www.asd103.org/AMS. Yet you show it as 2200. Can you confirm the address is correct?
|
|
| 177044694 | Thhe school's website shows the address as 2202 M Avenue. https://www.asd103.org/AMS. Yet you show it as 2200. Can you confirm the address is correct?
|
|
| 177041472 | Why did you reclassify the roads as service? They can still be consider residential even if privately owned. Can you review this edit? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 176911162 | It appears you created two "Anacortes Community Forest Lands" Can you fix? Let me know if you need help. |
|
| 176878583 | If the church or business operates in the entire building, then just tag the building outline. No need for a separate node
|
|
| 176828545 | #TIP: It's helpful to leave a brief changeset comment describing what you edited. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more info.
|
|
| 176811133 | You changed some sidewalks to paths but I walk and drive by them all the time and they look and feel like sidewalks. Can you review this edit? Let me know if you need help.
|