OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 170997938 | Why did you change the footway around the park to a cycleway? There doesn't seem to be any signage or lane restrictions on the sidewalk. Shouldn't it just be a sidewalk where bikes are allowed?
|
|
| 170945285 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170945181 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170945137 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170907018 | There were a number of problematic issues with this edit, like connecting a driveway to a distant driveway that crossed houses. And the draging of 30th Ave NW as well as the disconnect part of a driveway. Please be more careful with future edits.
|
|
| 170808324 | Not sure if tagging of wooded areas has been discussed, but it would be good to bring it up on Slack. |
|
| 170808324 | I typically tag the wooded areas as natural=wood since forest implies that it is logged. And while most of it is, there may be sections that are not.
|
|
| 170861891 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. There were a number of issues with your edit. You dragged a crossing node on Brooklyn Ave, duplicated landuse areas, added a name to features that already have been named. This is an extremely dense neighborhood. I know, I used to live just a few blocks away. It takes patience to edit in a dense neiborhood. So good for you for trying, but please be very careful in the future. I'll send you more info on OSM in a messge.
|
|
| 170860613 | The school was already tagged, but your node was better placed so I merged the two.
|
|
| 170860440 | It looks like you added duplicate ways in two fo the building you modified. I removed the duplicate ways. Let me know if you have any questions.
|
|
| 170860145 | The original house looked better. I think the only problem is the imagery offset needed adjusting. You can do that in the editor by clicking on the background icon. Imagery offset is located towards the bottom of the list.
|
|
| 170860423 | The correct tag is building=*. I went ahead and added it back.
|
|
| 170861085 | Looking at the county reconds, my guess is these are just service roads. Can you review and remove the parking aisle tag as needed?
|
|
| 170861085 | This appears to be a housing developement so the road is either just a highway=service or highway=residential. A parking aisle is found in a parking lot next to car parking spaces.
|
|
| 170860694 | The buildings still need the building= tag. I went ahead and added them back.
|
|
| 170857913 | #TIP: If the features don't align with the imagery, just adjust the imagery offset using the Background settings icon on the right side of the editor. the offset adjustment is located towards the bottom of the list.
|
|
| 170819182 | I'm curious, why did you remove the wikidata and wikipedia tags?
|
|
| 170812134 | Food trucks should be tagged as street_vendor=yes. See street_vendor=yes for more details on how to tag. Can you review this edit?
|
|
| 170810096 | The landuse residential + residential=suburban would be better just as landuse=residential. A suburban is usually a much larger area.
|
|
| 170809846 | It would help adding the type of business is located inside of the building such as amenity=casino. Also, it Casino the actual name of the business? Seems rather generic.
|