OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
163503763

I'm guessing there is a roof over the gas pumps. It's best to tag the polygon as building=roof + level=1. Adding the level tag allows service road to go under the roof without causing a validation error.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503763

163503109

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503109

163502095

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502095

163502299

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502299

163502253

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502253

163502010

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It looks like you moved an address from the correct location. See https://gisweb.jeffcowa.us/LandRecords/ for address data. Can you fix this? Let me know if you need assistance.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502010

163501781

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501781

163501066

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501066

163497081

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163497081

163497013

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163497013

163496976

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163496976

163496953

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163496953

163466820

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good with the exception of descriptive names. We do not use descriptive names in OSM. Instead, find a tag that best describes the feature. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163466820

163422261

There is no road across 101. Reverting
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422261

163422488

Also a trunk. Reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422488

163422475

Same again. It's not even a divided highway. reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422475

163422444

This is also a trunk. Reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422444

163422417

The local community has agreed that this is a trunk. I'm going to revert.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422417

163378278

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion. Try not to connect the trail to the park landuse. If either change, it requires disconnecting nodes.

Also, Is this a trail or more like a gravel sidewalk? OSM, which started in England, uses British English terms. So a path lis like a trail and a footway is more like a sidewalk. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163378278

163229741

A couple of questions. You tagged a house on E. Mill Plain Blvd as a place of worship. It looks more like a plain house. Is it really a place of worship, or maybe the pastors house?

Also you tagged two house as tourism=apartment. I think a better way is to tag it as building=apartments. There building just for tourism so it you may be correct. We just don't see that many.

Can you review this edits? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163229741