This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't vandalize OSM
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162190750

FYI - an unclassified road is basically just a rural residential road. We do this because OSM was started in England so we use their road classification system. I mention this because you changed an unclassified road to residential.

I notice you removed a footway near West Railroad Avenue. Is there a reason you removed it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162185970

The path was tagged as access=private. Because of that I reverted your edit but did add a tag ownership=private. If you disagree, please explain why. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139990

One website shows the site as active. See https://www.airnav.com/airport/WA75. Not sure how accurate the site is.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162138990

Thanks for fixing the house numbers. Please note that there is already a park. The address node is for the park. I'd suggest adding it back to the park boundary. Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162074654

I fixed the relationship and also removed the name from the guest house. We don't add names unless it is signed. Feel free to add it back if there is a sign.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162062476

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162014931

nickvet419 please read the comments in the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 for a better understanding of how the community views this matter.

Can you add the names back that you believe are transliterations unless you know they are wrong. Also, official_name:en should not be there since we have the tag official_name. Which by the way, has not been made yet.

Why did you remove some of the names in other languages? Have you read the discussion on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/9 - Mostly about the Gulf of Mexico, but Denali is also included.
After reading the community forum, please explain why this edit shouldn't be reverted?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162068466

Can you fix this one as well. Add a parking lot and remove the parking_aisle you added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161949195

I'd suggest creating an parking area polygon and tag it as you did the parking aisle. The parking aisle you added should be removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161948419

Instead of tagging the service streets with the park and ride name, add a polygon area for the parking lot and name it Wheaton Way Park & Ride with park_ride=yes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161914984

A couple of questions. Is the place under construction?

Is the parking in building? If so create a node at the entrance to the parking and tag it as amenity=parking_entrance + parking=underground. The service road should end there.

The residential road you added should really be highway=service with no name.

Can you review your edit and correct it as needed. Let me know if you need help. I'll send more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161914643

The community has not agreed upon rename the gulf. See the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/178 and join in to the discussion.

This edit will be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161992832

They appear to be correctly map as driveways along with access=private which is kind of redundant. I'm going to revert this changeset. Please note that verifiable features can be added to OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161881145

I received the same information from another user. When I saw the name it jumped out at me as a prank and I wanted it removed if it was. I guess not. :-)

I have reverted this changeset. The name has not been agreed upon by the community. I suggest you read https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/87.

I can't find that peak on USGS maps. Can you point me to the source

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

We do not use descriptive names, such as Ayatma Rope swing unless there is an actual sign with that name. Can you review this node? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161837721