OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 160455485 | #TIP: OSM does not use descriptive names such as name=Woods" Is North Woods what the large area of woods are actually named? Can you review this edit.
|
|
| 160318802 | Since you didn't fix it, I have changed it to a service road that it appears to be. Let me know if you have any questions. |
|
| 160408106 | Please don't vandalize OSM. Your edit has been removed.
|
|
| 160407705 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 160419822 | The way added seems more like a highway=track. Unclassified basically is a rural residential street. Can you review this edit?
|
|
| 160413988 | You might want to use a more recent imagery like the Bing imagery. It's a high quality and years more recent than the esri clarity.
|
|
| 160379109 | $TIP: save and upload your edits before moving on to a more distant location.
|
|
| 160379109 | You added a couple of fords on the South Fork Fortune Creek but the stream was shown to go through a colvert. If the culvert is there, then the ford should be remove, else the culvert should be removed. Since you are familiar with this area, can you review your edit?
|
|
| 160325803 | Ideally this construction landuse should be changed to leisure=playgound instead of deleting the polygon area.
|
|
| 160318802 | classifying the canal road as a primary seems like a stretch. At best it is highway=service. The county doesn't even have it on it's basemaps. See https://matterhornwab.co.pierce.wa.us/publicgis/ Can you please correct?
|
|
| 159758796 | Looks like duplicate buildings from the small area I looked at. |
|
| 160266829 | #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbrevating.
|
|
| 160260675 | There are two existing roudabouts to the east and west of your addition. Is that what you are talking about?
|
|
| 160260675 | There are two existing roudabouts to the east and west of your addition. Is that what you are talking about?
|
|
| 160266779 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Please do not vandalize OSM by adding features that do not exist on the ground. I'm reverting this edit.
|
|
| 160192281 | removed beach tag |
|
| 73680625 | There is a business Alices's Floral Designs there which does seem to imply the building may have been named Alice. I'm going to ask a friend that frequents the area if he knows or can find out. |
|
| 160147961 | Did you not understand my changeset comment about not adding parcel polygons as houses? Let me know how I can help. |
|
| 160110951 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. These look more like parcels that houses and we don't add parcel areas in OSM because they are not verifiable by an onsite visit. When adding houses, the outline should follow the roof line. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 160110923 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|